HIGH 7.5

CVE-2026-58465: Eclipse Wakaama CoAP Block1 Memory Exhaustion Denial of Service

Eclipse Wakaama, a lightweight IoT device management framework, has a memory exhaustion vulnerability in how it processes CoAP (Constrained Application Protocol) block transfers. An unauthenticated attacker can send a series of fragmented upload requests to a Wakaama server over the network, causing the server to accumulate data in memory without any safeguard. Eventually, the server runs out of memory and stops responding—a denial-of-service attack that requires no credentials or special access.

Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain

CVSS
3.1 · 7.5 HIGH · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Weaknesses (CWE)
CWE-770
Affected products
0 configuration(s)
Published / Modified
2026-07-02 / 2026-07-14

NVD description (verbatim)

Eclipse Wakaama before snapshot/2026-05-26 contains an unbounded memory allocation vulnerability in the CoAP Block1 handler within coap/block.c that allows unauthenticated remote attackers to exhaust server memory by sending a sequence of Block1 PUT requests with incrementing block numbers. Attackers can target the registration endpoint over UDP without authentication, causing the server to repeatedly reallocate a growing accumulation buffer by appending each block payload without enforcing any maximum total size limit, resulting in denial of service through memory exhaustion.

4 reference(s) · View on NVD →

SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source

Technical summary

The vulnerability exists in coap/block.c, specifically in the Block1 handler that manages incoming CoAP PUT requests fragmented into blocks. When processing a sequence of Block1 PUT requests targeting the registration endpoint, the implementation appends each block's payload to a reassembly buffer without enforcing a maximum cumulative size. An attacker can send blocks with incrementing block numbers over UDP, causing the buffer to grow without bound until server memory is exhausted. The flaw is reachable without authentication and does not require user interaction.

Business impact

A successful attack renders a Wakaama-based IoT management server unavailable, disrupting device provisioning, firmware updates, and remote management operations. In industrial IoT, smart city, or healthcare deployments where Wakaama manages large device fleets, this can cascade into operational downtime. Recovery requires manual service restart. The attack is trivial to execute—a single attacker with network access can degrade or eliminate service availability for legitimate device management tasks.

Affected systems

Eclipse Wakaama snapshots released before 2026-05-26 are vulnerable. Wakaama is used in embedded systems, IoT gateways, and device management platforms. Any deployment exposing a Wakaama server to untrusted networks—including internet-facing management endpoints—is at risk. The vulnerability is in a core protocol handler, so all Wakaama installations using CoAP Block1 transfers are potentially affected unless patched.

Exploitability

Exploitability is high. The attack requires only network access (no authentication, no credentials, no user interaction) and can be launched with standard CoAP tooling or a simple script. The attacker needs to know or guess the server's CoAP endpoint address and port. No special timing, race conditions, or system-specific tuning is required. A proof-of-concept is straightforward: rapidly send Block1 PUT requests with monotonically increasing block numbers until the server becomes unresponsive.

Remediation

Upgrade to Eclipse Wakaama snapshot/2026-05-26 or later. The fix enforces a maximum cumulative size limit on Block1 reassembly buffers, rejecting oversized transfers before memory exhaustion occurs. Verify the patch version against the official Eclipse Wakaama release notes and security advisories. Organizations unable to patch immediately should implement network-level controls: restrict CoAP access to trusted management networks, use firewalls to limit ingress on CoAP ports (typically UDP 5683), and monitor for unusual patterns of Block1 requests.

Patch guidance

Apply the update from Eclipse Wakaama snapshot/2026-05-26 or a later stable release. Test patched builds in a non-production environment to ensure compatibility with your device fleet and management workflows. Pay particular attention to any custom CoAP handlers or block-processing extensions you may have added; verify they work correctly with the updated core. Review release notes for any configuration changes related to block transfer limits. After patching, restart all affected Wakaama services and confirm normal device management operations resume.

Detection guidance

Monitor CoAP traffic for anomalous Block1 PUT sequences: repeated requests with incrementing block numbers from a single source, especially to the registration endpoint, may indicate an attack attempt. Track server memory and CPU usage during CoAP operations; a sustained spike without corresponding legitimate activity is suspicious. Implement CoAP-aware logging in your management stack to record block transfers; correlate high-volume or oversized block sequences with service degradation. Consider deploying CoAP firewalls or proxies that rate-limit or validate block sizes before they reach the server. For detection systems lacking CoAP inspection, watch for UDP traffic surges on port 5683 from external sources.

Why prioritize this

This is a HIGH-severity vulnerability affecting core IoT infrastructure. The combination of unauthenticated network access, no user interaction required, and direct impact on service availability (denial of service) makes it an urgent remediation target. IoT deployments often operate 24/7 and manage critical systems; downtime compounds over time and may trigger SLA violations or cascading failures. The ease of exploitation and low attacker skill barrier mean active exploitation is probable in internet-facing deployments. Prioritize patching for any externally accessible or DMZ-deployed Wakaama instances.

Risk score, explained

CVSS 3.1 score of 7.5 (HIGH) reflects: Attack Vector Network (remote exploitation possible), Attack Complexity Low (no special conditions), Privileges Required None (unauthenticated), User Interaction None (direct server impact), and Availability Impact High (denial of service). Confidentiality and Integrity are unaffected (the attack only exhausts memory, not exposing or corrupting data). The score accurately reflects the practical threat: a trivial-to-execute network denial-of-service attack on a widely-deployed IoT framework.

Frequently asked questions

Does the attacker need to be authenticated or have credentials?

No. The vulnerability is in the unauthenticated CoAP registration endpoint, so any network-connected attacker can launch the attack without any credentials, API keys, or prior access.

What versions of Eclipse Wakaama are vulnerable?

All snapshots before 2026-05-26 are affected. Check your deployment snapshot version against the official Eclipse Wakaama release history and apply the patch from 2026-05-26 or any later stable release.

Can this vulnerability lead to data theft or corruption?

No. The attack exhausts server memory to cause denial of service. It does not enable unauthorized access to device data, credentials, or firmware. The impact is availability only—the server becomes unresponsive.

What network access is required to exploit this vulnerability?

Only UDP network connectivity to the Wakaama server's CoAP port (default UDP 5683). If the CoAP endpoint is exposed to the internet or an untrusted network, the vulnerability is remotely exploitable without any additional preconditions.

This analysis is provided for informational purposes and based on the vulnerability description as of 2026-07-14. No exploit code is provided. Organizations should verify patch availability and compatibility with their specific Wakaama deployment version against official Eclipse Wakaama security advisories and release notes before applying updates. Testing in a non-production environment is recommended. SEC.co does not warrant the completeness or accuracy of third-party vulnerability data and recommends consulting vendor security bulletins for definitive remediation guidance. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-08-11. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).