CVE-2026-58026: MediaWiki Sensitive Information Disclosure in Parser (CVSS 5.7)
A vulnerability in MediaWiki allows authenticated users to view sensitive information they shouldn't have access to through a flaw in the parser component. An attacker needs a valid login and user interaction to exploit this, limiting the attack surface but still representing a meaningful information disclosure risk in environments where many users have accounts.
Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain
- CVSS
- 3.1 · 5.7 MEDIUM · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
- Weaknesses (CWE)
- CWE-200
- Affected products
- 2 configuration(s)
- Published / Modified
- 2026-07-01 / 2026-07-09
NVD description (verbatim)
Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor vulnerability in Wikimedia Foundation MediaWiki. This vulnerability is associated with program files includes/Parser/Parser.Php. This issue affects MediaWiki: from * before 1.46.0, 1.45.4, 1.44.6, 1.43.9.
1 reference(s) · View on NVD →
SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source
Technical summary
CVE-2026-58026 is an information disclosure vulnerability (CWE-200) in MediaWiki's Parser.php file that permits authenticated users to access confidential data beyond their authorization scope. The vulnerability requires both valid credentials and user interaction to trigger, as indicated by the CVSS vector components (PR:L for low privilege requirement, UI:R for user interaction required). The confidentiality impact is rated high (C:H), while integrity and availability remain unaffected (I:N, A:N). The attack vector is network-based with low complexity, suggesting straightforward exploitation once an attacker gains initial access.
Business impact
The exposure of sensitive information through this parser vulnerability creates compliance and competitive risk for organizations running MediaWiki. Depending on the content stored—documentation, proprietary workflows, or internal communications—unauthorized disclosure could violate data protection regulations, damage competitive advantage, or erode stakeholder trust. The requirement for authenticated access somewhat limits the threat scope to insider threats and compromised accounts, but organizations with permissive user provisioning or shared accounts face elevated exposure. Reputational damage from information leakage during a security incident can be substantial, particularly for knowledge-based or collaborative platforms.
Affected systems
MediaWiki versions before 1.46.0, 1.45.4, 1.44.6, and 1.43.9 are vulnerable. This affects organizations running any unsupported or unpatched version across these release branches. Both standalone MediaWiki deployments and those integrated into larger wikis or documentation systems are in scope. The vulnerability's age and breadth of affected versions means many legacy or long-term supported installations remain at risk if update schedules have been deferred.
Exploitability
Exploitation requires a valid MediaWiki user account and active user interaction to trigger the parser flaw. This is a meaningful operational barrier that prevents opportunistic attacks from fully unauthenticated threat actors. However, the attack complexity is low once authentication is obtained, meaning any user with legitimate access can reliably exploit the vulnerability with minimal technical skill. Organizations with single sign-on, shared accounts, or a large internal user base face higher practical risk than those with strict access controls and identity governance.
Remediation
Apply security patches to bring MediaWiki to a patched version: 1.46.0 or later, 1.45.4 or later, 1.44.6 or later, or 1.43.9 or later, depending on your deployment's supported branch. Verify patch availability in the Wikimedia Foundation security advisory for your specific version track. Administrators should prioritize instances containing highly sensitive documentation or internal communications. Test patches in a staging environment before production rollout to ensure compatibility with extensions and custom configurations.
Patch guidance
Review your current MediaWiki version and identify which supported branch you follow (1.46, 1.45, 1.44, or 1.43). Obtain the corresponding patched release from the Wikimedia Foundation's official download or distribution channel. For extended support versions, ensure patches are available from your support vendor. Schedule patching during a maintenance window, coordinate with users if the wiki will be briefly offline, and validate that extensions and custom parser hooks remain functional post-patch. Organizations on very old versions not explicitly listed (e.g., 1.42 or earlier) should evaluate end-of-life status and plan migration accordingly.
Detection guidance
Monitor server logs and access patterns for authenticated users accessing parser functions or page previews that include sensitive content they should not view. Look for unusual access to pages containing private information, templates, or metadata by low-privilege accounts. Examine Parser.php error logs for exceptions or unusual parser state during the vulnerability window before patching. Implement audit logging on page access and modification if available. Note that detection is challenging post-exploitation; focus on identifying unauthorized access patterns during the incident response phase. Intrusion detection systems may have limited visibility since the attack is internal to the application logic.
Why prioritize this
This vulnerability merits prompt attention due to the combination of authenticated-only access (which narrows scope but doesn't eliminate risk in permissive environments) and high confidentiality impact. Organizations with sensitive internal documentation, proprietary knowledge bases, or regulatory data stored in MediaWiki should prioritize patching. The CVSS score of 5.7 (MEDIUM) reflects the authentication barrier, but the real-world severity depends heavily on deployment context. The absence of active exploitation in the wild (KEV not listed) provides a window for orderly patching without emergency pressure, but the broad range of affected versions means many installations are still vulnerable.
Risk score, explained
The CVSS 5.7 MEDIUM score balances a high confidentiality impact against the requirements for valid authentication and user interaction. The network attack vector and low attack complexity keep severity from being lower, but the privilege and interaction requirements prevent a HIGH rating. Organizations with large user populations, especially those not segregating information access by role, should mentally elevate this within their own prioritization framework. The absence from the CISA KEV catalog indicates no current active exploitation, reducing urgency relative to critical vulnerabilities, but does not diminish the underlying information disclosure risk.
Frequently asked questions
Can this vulnerability be exploited by unauthenticated attackers?
No. The vulnerability requires a valid MediaWiki user account and active user interaction to trigger. This meaningfully limits the attack surface to insiders, compromised accounts, or accounts obtained through separate credential theft. Organizations with very restricted user access face lower practical risk than those with broad or shared account provisioning.
What information can be disclosed?
The vulnerability in the parser component allows access to sensitive information through parser functionality. The specific content at risk depends on what is stored in the wiki—internal documentation, metadata, templates, or protected content. Conduct an audit of your wiki's content sensitivity to understand exposure scope post-disclosure.
Is there active exploitation of this vulnerability in the wild?
As of the published date, this vulnerability is not listed on the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog, indicating no widespread active exploitation has been publicly reported. However, this does not guarantee absence of targeted or private exploitation attempts.
Do we need to patch immediately if our wiki is internal-only?
Internal-only wikis still require patching, but patch timing can be scheduled within a standard maintenance window rather than as an emergency. However, assess whether your access controls genuinely limit the user base to trusted insiders. If the wiki is accessible to many employees or contractors without strong segregation of sensitive data by role, prioritize patching sooner.
This analysis is provided for informational purposes based on the published CVE record. SEC.co does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of vendor patch information; always verify patch availability and version numbers directly with the Wikimedia Foundation security advisory and your distribution channel. Exploit code, proof-of-concept steps, and weaponization guidance are not provided. Organizations should conduct their own risk assessment based on their specific MediaWiki deployment, user population, and data sensitivity. This document does not constitute legal or compliance advice; engage your legal and compliance teams for regulatory impact assessment. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-08-10. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).
Related vulnerabilities
- CVE-2026-58024MEDIUMMediaWiki User Rights API Information Disclosure Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-58027MEDIUMWikimedia AbuseFilter Information Disclosure Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-58033MEDIUMMediaWiki Information Disclosure Vulnerability – Patch Now
- CVE-2026-58036HIGHMediaWiki User Information Disclosure via Unauth API Access
- CVE-2026-10254MEDIUMUnauthenticated Information Disclosure in SourceCodester Pet Grooming Software
- CVE-2026-10854MEDIUMMISP Galaxy Visibility Control Bypass – Unauthorized Private Metadata Access
- CVE-2026-10864MEDIUMMISP Dashboard Widget Field Filtering Bypass (Medium)
- CVE-2026-11162MEDIUMChrome CSS Cross-Origin Data Leak Vulnerability