CVE-2026-57289: Jenkins Bitbucket Plugin Bearer Token Exposure via SSL/TLS Validation Bypass
Jenkins Bitbucket Push and Pull Request Plugin version 3.3.8 and earlier contains a security flaw that disables SSL/TLS certificate validation when sending authentication tokens to Bitbucket Server. This means an attacker positioned to intercept network traffic—such as on a shared network or compromised router—could potentially capture the authentication token in transit, even though the connection appears secure. The vulnerability requires specific network conditions to exploit but represents a meaningful risk to Jenkins installations that rely on this plugin for Bitbucket integration.
Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain
- CVSS
- 3.1 · 4.8 MEDIUM · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
- Weaknesses (CWE)
- CWE-295
- Affected products
- 1 configuration(s)
- Published / Modified
- 2026-06-24 / 2026-06-26
NVD description (verbatim)
Jenkins Bitbucket Push and Pull Request Plugin 3.3.8 and earlier unconditionally disables SSL/TLS certificate and hostname validation for connections sending Bearer token authenticated requests to the configured Bitbucket Server endpoint, allowing attackers able to intercept network traffic to capture the token.
1 reference(s) · View on NVD →
SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source
Technical summary
CVE-2026-57289 stems from improper certificate and hostname validation in the Jenkins Bitbucket Push and Pull Request Plugin. When the plugin establishes connections to a configured Bitbucket Server endpoint using Bearer token authentication, it unconditionally disables SSL/TLS validation mechanisms. This creates a man-in-the-middle (MITM) vulnerability where an attacker capable of network interception can capture plaintext authentication tokens. The vulnerability is classified under CWE-295 (Improper Certificate Validation), a well-known class of authentication bypass issues. The CVSS 3.1 score of 4.8 (MEDIUM severity) reflects the requirement for network-level access and the specific conditions needed to exploit the flaw, though the impact—token disclosure—remains significant.
Business impact
Compromise of Bitbucket authentication tokens exposed via this vulnerability could allow attackers to impersonate Jenkins in API interactions with Bitbucket Server, potentially enabling unauthorized code repository access, build pipeline tampering, or exfiltration of repository data. For organizations using this plugin in shared hosting, development lab networks, or environments with elevated network-level threat actors, the risk extends to the integrity of CI/CD workflows. Affected organizations should treat token exposure as equivalent to a credential breach and implement immediate rotation and monitoring protocols.
Affected systems
Jenkins Bitbucket Push and Pull Request Plugin versions 3.3.8 and earlier are affected. Organizations running these versions—particularly those on outdated or extended release cycles—are in scope. The vulnerability does not affect later plugin versions, making patching straightforward for most deployments. Self-hosted Jenkins instances and Jenkins controllers directly integrated with Bitbucket Server are the primary targets.
Exploitability
Exploitation requires network-level access to intercept traffic between the Jenkins instance and Bitbucket Server endpoint. This is not an unauthenticated remote code execution vulnerability; rather, it is a credential theft vulnerability with a relatively high bar for exploitation. Attackers must position themselves on the network path—feasible in shared data center environments, compromised routers, or through ARP spoofing—to capture the token. The CVSS vector (AV:N/AC:H) correctly reflects these constraints: network-accessible but with high complexity. Exploitation is not known to be actively leveraged in the wild, and no public proof-of-concept details have been disclosed.
Remediation
Update Jenkins Bitbucket Push and Pull Request Plugin to a version later than 3.3.8. Consult your Jenkins plugin update mechanism and the official Jenkins security advisory for the patched version number and deployment instructions. Additionally, organizations should rotate any Bitbucket Server authentication tokens that may have been exposed during the vulnerable window, implement network segmentation to limit MITM attack surface, and consider enforcing certificate pinning or additional proxy-level SSL/TLS inspection if feasible.
Patch guidance
Patch availability is the primary remediation path. Use Jenkins' built-in plugin manager to upgrade the Bitbucket Push and Pull Request Plugin from version 3.3.8 to the corrected release (verify the exact version against the vendor advisory). For air-gapped environments, download the patched plugin from the official Jenkins update center and deploy manually. Plan the upgrade during a maintenance window to avoid build interruption, though the plugin typically loads without Jenkins controller restart. Test the patched version in a staging Jenkins instance first to confirm Bitbucket connectivity and authentication remain functional.
Detection guidance
Monitor Jenkins plugin versions and maintain an inventory of Bitbucket Push and Pull Request Plugin deployments to identify running versions ≤3.3.8. Review Jenkins logs for Bearer token authentication failures or connection warnings to the Bitbucket Server endpoint, which may indicate environment differences after patching. If token exposure is suspected, audit Bitbucket Server authentication logs for unauthorized API calls using the affected Jenkins service account. Network-level detection is possible via SSL/TLS inspection tools that would flag missing certificate validation; organizations with proxy-based inspection can flag connections from Jenkins to Bitbucket lacking proper certificate chain validation.
Why prioritize this
While rated MEDIUM severity, this vulnerability merits prompt remediation because it directly enables credential theft—a high-impact outcome—and affects a commonly integrated plugin in CI/CD environments. The requirement for network-level access does not diminish urgency for organizations on shared or untrusted networks. The lack of KEV status indicates no known active exploitation, providing a window for orderly patching before threats emerge. Prioritize environments where Bitbucket Server credentials grant broad repository or build access.
Risk score, explained
The CVSS 3.1 score of 4.8 reflects a vulnerability with limited attack surface (AC:H, requiring network positioning) but meaningful confidentiality and integrity impact (C:L, I:L) if exploited. The absence of availability impact (A:N) and the lack of privilege escalation requirements prevent a higher score. In context, the score appropriately captures the credential-theft nature of the issue: more serious than a minor information leak, but less critical than remote code execution or unauthenticated access. Risk perception should be adjusted upward for organizations already operating in threat environments where network interception is plausible.
Frequently asked questions
Do we need to patch immediately, or can this wait until the next maintenance window?
Patching should occur within your next planned maintenance window, ideally within 30 days. Since active exploitation is not yet reported, you have reasonable flexibility. However, prioritize this over non-critical updates. If you operate in a shared network environment or suspect potential traffic interception, accelerate the timeline.
What exactly is a Bearer token, and why does capturing it matter?
A Bearer token is a cryptographic credential that proves identity to APIs without a username and password. In this context, it authenticates Jenkins to Bitbucket Server. If captured, an attacker can impersonate Jenkins and perform any action the token permits—from reading code to triggering builds. Treat token capture as equivalent to a credential compromise and rotate affected tokens immediately after patching.
We're behind a corporate proxy with SSL inspection. Are we still vulnerable?
Corporate proxies with SSL/TLS inspection add a layer of protection by validating certificates at the proxy boundary. However, if the proxy is transparent or improperly configured, the underlying vulnerability in the plugin still exists. Proper certificate validation should occur at both the proxy and application level. Verify your proxy configuration, but do not rely on it as a substitute for patching the plugin.
Can we disable Bearer token authentication in the plugin instead of patching?
Consult the plugin documentation to determine if alternative authentication methods (e.g., API tokens without Bearer scheme) are available. If available and operationally compatible, this could serve as a short-term mitigation. However, patching is the correct long-term solution and may not impose additional operational overhead.
This analysis is based on available vulnerability data as of the publication date. Vendor advisories, patch releases, and exploitation status may change; organizations should consult the official Jenkins security advisory and Bitbucket Server vendor guidance for the most current information, including exact patched version numbers and compatibility notes. This analysis does not constitute legal, security, or compliance advice. Organizations should conduct their own risk assessment based on their specific environment and threat model. SEC.co makes no warranty regarding patch effectiveness or operational compatibility in any particular deployment. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-07-30. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).
Related vulnerabilities
- CVE-2024-47477MEDIUMDell PowerFlex Manager Certificate Validation Flaw (CVSS 6.5)
- CVE-2025-2669MEDIUMIBM Db2 Token Validation Flaw Enables Privilege Escalation
- CVE-2026-40992MEDIUMSpring Boot Mail Auto-Configuration Missing Hostname Verification
- CVE-2026-41714MEDIUMSpring AMQP TLS Certificate Validation Bypass Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-42769MEDIUMOpenSSL CMP Root CA Certificate Validation Bypass
- CVE-2026-49267MEDIUMApache Airflow EmailOperator STARTTLS Certificate Verification Bypass
- CVE-2026-54323MEDIUMDaytona TLS Certificate Bypass in Git Clone Operations
- CVE-2026-9258MEDIUMCanon EOS Network Setting Tool SSH Key Validation Flaw