CVE-2026-56669: Elysia Form Data Processing DoS Vulnerability
Elysia, a TypeScript framework for building and validating web services, contains a performance flaw in how it processes file upload forms. When handling multipart/form-data requests (the standard for file uploads), the framework uses an inefficient algorithm that causes CPU usage to spike dramatically as more form fields are submitted. An attacker can exploit this by sending a request with many form fields, forcing the server to consume excessive CPU resources and become unresponsive. This is a denial-of-service vulnerability that requires no authentication and can be triggered remotely.
Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain
- CVSS
- 3.1 · 7.5 HIGH · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
- Weaknesses (CWE)
- CWE-407, CWE-436
- Affected products
- 0 configuration(s)
- Published / Modified
- 2026-07-08 / 2026-07-10
NVD description (verbatim)
Elysia is a Typescript framework for request validation, type inference, OpenAPI documentation, and client-server communication. Prior to 1.4.29, Elysia uses getAll in form data normalization for multipart/form-data endpoints, causing the amount of work to grow quadratically with the number of unique key-value pairs and allowing CPU exhaustion. This issue is fixed in version 1.4.29.
4 reference(s) · View on NVD →
SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source
Technical summary
The vulnerability stems from Elysia's use of the getAll method during form data normalization for multipart/form-data endpoints. The getAll operation exhibits quadratic time complexity relative to the number of unique key-value pairs in the request. This algorithmic inefficiency means that processing time grows dramatically (not linearly) with each additional form field, enabling attackers to trigger CPU exhaustion with a relatively modest number of form fields. The flaw affects all versions of Elysia prior to 1.4.29. The issue is categorized under CWE-407 (inefficient algorithmic complexity) and CWE-436 (interpretation conflict), both common precursors to resource exhaustion attacks.
Business impact
Elysia-based services are vulnerable to remotely triggered availability attacks. An attacker sending a single malicious request with dozens or hundreds of form fields can cause significant CPU spikes, degrading or completely disabling the service. For organizations running Elysia in production—particularly SaaS platforms, APIs handling file uploads, or backend services with high availability requirements—this vulnerability poses a direct threat to service uptime and customer experience. The attack requires no credentials, no complex exploit infrastructure, and no user interaction, making it a straightforward denial-of-service vector that could be weaponized broadly once disclosed.
Affected systems
Elysia framework versions prior to 1.4.29 are affected. Organizations using Elysia for any multipart/form-data handling (file uploads, complex form submissions, etc.) should be considered at risk. This includes custom applications, microservices, and any TypeScript/Bun-based backends leveraging Elysia for request validation and routing. The vulnerability is network-accessible and does not require the attacker to be authenticated or have local access.
Exploitability
This vulnerability is highly exploitable. The attack is trivial to execute—an attacker need only craft an HTTP POST request with multipart/form-data encoding and include a large number of form fields (or deeply nested structures) to trigger quadratic algorithmic behavior. No special tooling, credentials, or user interaction is required. The attack surface is wide: any publicly exposed endpoint accepting multipart/form-data is a potential target. The low CVSS attack complexity (AC:L) and lack of privilege requirements (PR:N) reflect this ease of exploitation. However, the attack is limited to denial-of-service; it does not leak data or allow code execution.
Remediation
Upgrade Elysia to version 1.4.29 or later. This version replaces the inefficient getAll normalization with a more efficient algorithm, eliminating the quadratic complexity. Organizations should prioritize this upgrade for any production Elysia deployments, particularly those handling untrusted input or exposed to the internet. Testing after upgrade is recommended to ensure no breaking changes to existing form data handling logic.
Patch guidance
Apply Elysia 1.4.29 or later as soon as possible. Verify the version in your package.json or package-lock.json, and update using your package manager (npm, yarn, pnpm, etc.). If you are running Elysia as a dependency of another framework or library, check with the upstream maintainer for an updated release incorporating the patched Elysia version. No interim workarounds or configuration changes mitigate this flaw; patching is the only reliable fix. After patching, restart your application to ensure the new version is active.
Detection guidance
Monitor for incoming HTTP requests with multipart/form-data encoding that contain an unusually high number of form fields (e.g., >50–100 fields, depending on your baseline). Track CPU usage on Elysia application processes; sustained spikes correlated with form data requests may indicate exploitation attempts. Application Performance Monitoring (APM) tools can flag requests that take disproportionately long to process. Log unusual form submission patterns and consider rate-limiting or request size caps as temporary protective measures. Note that legitimate bulk form submissions may also trigger these signatures, so contextualize alerts accordingly. Post-patch, such monitoring can serve as forensic evidence of exploitation attempts before the upgrade was deployed.
Why prioritize this
This vulnerability warrants urgent patching despite its availability-only impact (no confidentiality or integrity risk). The combination of trivial exploitability, lack of authentication barriers, and direct threat to service availability makes it a prime candidate for rapid attack. Organizations with public-facing Elysia services or those processing untrusted file uploads should treat this as a critical operational risk. The fix is straightforward (a version bump), and there are no known significant breaking changes in the patch, reducing deployment friction.
Risk score, explained
The CVSS 3.1 score of 7.5 (HIGH) reflects a network-accessible, low-complexity attack requiring no privileges or user interaction that results in a complete availability impact. The attack vector is network-based (AV:N), attack complexity is low (AC:L), no privileges are needed (PR:N), and no user interaction is required (UI:N). The scope is unchanged (S:U), meaning the attack affects only the vulnerable application itself and not other systems. Confidentiality and integrity are not impacted (C:N/I:N), but availability is fully compromised (A:H). This score appropriately prioritizes the ease and breadth of exploitation against the limited scope of impact (denial-of-service only).
Frequently asked questions
Does this vulnerability leak sensitive data or allow code execution?
No. This is strictly a denial-of-service vulnerability. It exhausts CPU resources, making the service unavailable, but does not result in unauthorized data access, information disclosure, or remote code execution. An attacker cannot read application data, modify requests, or gain shell access via this flaw.
Do I need to apply this patch if my Elysia application does not accept file uploads?
If your application does not handle multipart/form-data requests (e.g., you only accept JSON payloads), the vulnerable code path is not triggered and you face lower immediate risk. However, we still recommend upgrading to 1.4.29 to prevent future risk if your application's functionality evolves or if multipart handling is added in a minor update.
What is the difference between versions prior to 1.4.29 and later versions?
Versions prior to 1.4.29 use the getAll method for form data normalization, which has quadratic time complexity. Version 1.4.29 and later replace this with a more efficient algorithm that avoids this algorithmic bottleneck. The functional behavior of form data handling should remain identical; the change is internal performance optimization.
Can rate-limiting or request size caps protect me until I upgrade?
Partially. Rate-limiting can reduce the frequency of attacks, and strict request size caps (e.g., limiting multipart payloads to a reasonable limit) can reduce the effectiveness of any single attack. However, these are workarounds, not fixes. An attacker can still trigger significant CPU exhaustion with a smaller number of fields, especially if your service has high concurrency. Patching to 1.4.29 is the definitive mitigation.
This analysis is provided for informational purposes to help security teams understand and prioritize vulnerability remediation. The information is based on publicly available data and vendor advisories as of the publication date. Actual impact and exploitability may vary depending on configuration, network exposure, and the specific application context. Organizations should conduct their own risk assessment and testing before deploying patches. This page does not constitute professional security advice; consult with your security team or a professional advisor for guidance specific to your environment. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-08-17. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).
Related vulnerabilities
- CVE-2026-13311HIGHshell-quote Algorithmic Denial of Service Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-13676HIGHfast-uri IDN Canonicalization Bypass – Host Policy Enforcement Risk
- CVE-2026-41850HIGHSpring Framework SpEL Denial of Service Vulnerability (CVSS 7.5)
- CVE-2026-42462HIGHFedify JSON-LD Signature Bypass Vulnerability – Patch Now
- CVE-2026-42504HIGHMIME Header CPU Exhaustion Denial of Service – Patch Guidance
- CVE-2026-48502HIGHMessagePack for C# Stack Overflow in Timestamp Parsing
- CVE-2026-48511HIGHMessagePack for C# ExpandoObject Denial of Service
- CVE-2026-48516HIGHMessagePack for C# Hash Collision DoS Vulnerability