LOW 3.3

CVE-2026-56362: ImageMagick Heap Buffer Overflow in GetPixelIndex

ImageMagick versions before 7.1.2-15 contain a heap buffer overflow vulnerability that occurs when the image processing library reads from memory it hasn't properly allocated. The flaw stems from a sequence of operations where metadata is updated before the pixel cache memory is fully initialized, creating a window where out-of-bounds reads can occur. An attacker with administrative privileges can manipulate memory or disk allocation to trigger this condition, potentially exposing sensitive data from adjacent memory regions.

Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain

CVSS
3.1 · 3.3 LOW · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
Weaknesses (CWE)
CWE-125
Affected products
1 configuration(s)
Published / Modified
2026-07-08 / 2026-07-10

NVD description (verbatim)

ImageMagick before 7.1.2-15 contains a heap-buffer-overflow read vulnerability in GetPixelIndex caused by OpenPixelCache updating image channel metadata before pixel cache memory allocation. Attackers can trigger memory and disk allocation failures to cause a heap-buffer-overflow read affecting any writer calling GetPixelIndex.

2 reference(s) · View on NVD →

SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source

Technical summary

CVE-2026-56362 is a heap-buffer-overflow read vulnerability (CWE-125) in ImageMagick's GetPixelIndex function. The root cause lies in OpenPixelCache updating image channel metadata before allocating the underlying pixel cache memory. This sequence allows an attacker to induce memory or disk allocation failures that cause GetPixelIndex to read beyond allocated heap boundaries. The vulnerability affects any code path that calls GetPixelIndex after cache initialization, including image writers. The CVSS 3.1 score of 3.3 reflects the requirement for high privileges (PR:H) and difficult conditions to exploit (AC:H), though the impact includes both confidentiality loss and availability disruption.

Business impact

This vulnerability poses a limited but real risk in environments where ImageMagick processes untrusted image data under elevated privileges. The primary concern is information disclosure—sensitive data from adjacent heap memory could be leaked to an attacker who has administrative access or can influence system resource allocation. Organizations relying on ImageMagick for image conversion pipelines, especially in multi-tenant or cloud environments, should assess whether their deployment model allows an attacker to meet the high-privilege requirement. Availability impact is secondary but could affect service continuity if heap corruption leads to process crashes.

Affected systems

ImageMagick versions prior to 7.1.2-15 are vulnerable. All deployments—whether as a standalone tool, embedded library, or container service—that use affected versions are in scope. The vulnerability is triggered through normal image processing operations, so any system accepting image input and calling GetPixelIndex is potentially affected. No specific image format or codec dependency has been disclosed; the flaw is in the memory management layer itself.

Exploitability

Exploitation requires both high-privilege access (administrative rights) and the ability to trigger memory or disk allocation failures, making real-world exploitation difficult in well-configured environments. The attack is not remotely triggerable without pre-existing elevated access. However, in containerized or multi-tenant setups where resource controls are loose, or in scenarios where an insider can influence system resource availability, the barrier to exploitation is lower. No public exploit code or automated weaponization has been identified in the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog.

Remediation

Upgrade ImageMagick to version 7.1.2-15 or later. This patch version corrects the initialization sequence to allocate pixel cache memory before updating channel metadata. Organizations unable to upgrade immediately should restrict ImageMagick's execution context by enforcing least-privilege principles, limiting file system and memory resource availability, and isolating image processing workloads from high-value assets.

Patch guidance

Update ImageMagick installations to 7.1.2-15 or any later release. Verify the patched version is deployed across all systems running ImageMagick, including any embedded instances in containerized applications or cloud services. Test image processing workflows after patching to confirm functionality is preserved. Organizations using ImageMagick through package managers (apt, yum, brew) should prioritize updates once the patched version is available in their distribution channels.

Detection guidance

Monitor system logs for memory allocation failures coinciding with ImageMagick process execution, particularly involving heap allocation or cache initialization errors. Inspect running processes for ImageMagick versions using 'convert -version' or equivalent commands to identify unpatched instances. Consider application performance monitoring to detect unusual memory access patterns or segmentation faults during image processing. YARA rules targeting vulnerable ImageMagick binaries can aid in asset discovery.

Why prioritize this

Despite the low CVSS score, patch this vulnerability in any environment where ImageMagick handles images and administrative users or system processes interact with the same hardware or container. Prioritization should reflect your organization's privilege model: non-privileged, sandboxed deployments can defer updates, while installations with mixed privilege levels should treat this as moderate priority. The June 2026 publication date and lack of KEV status indicate this is not yet leveraged in active campaigns, providing a window for orderly patching.

Risk score, explained

The CVSS 3.1 score of 3.3 (LOW) reflects the combination of network-accessible attack vector (AV:N, though exploitation typically requires prior access), high attack complexity (AC:H due to the need to engineer allocation failures), requirement for high privileges (PR:H), and limited impact scope (confidentiality and availability, but not integrity). In isolated, privilege-separated environments, the practical risk is lower; in flat-permission architectures, risk is higher than the base score suggests.

Frequently asked questions

Can this vulnerability be exploited remotely without prior access?

Not practically. The attack requires high privileges and the ability to manipulate memory or disk allocation behavior, which presupposes either administrative access or a companion vulnerability. Network-based exploitation without pre-existing elevated access has not been demonstrated.

Does upgrading to 7.1.2-15 completely eliminate the risk?

Yes, assuming the upgrade is completed correctly and no downgrade occurs. The patch addresses the root cause by reordering initialization to ensure pixel cache memory is allocated before metadata is modified. Verify the installed version with 'convert -version' after patching.

Which ImageMagick features are most likely to trigger this flaw?

Any code path that processes images and calls GetPixelIndex during pixel cache operations is potentially vulnerable. Image writers and filters that iterate over pixel data are common triggers, but the exact code path depends on the image operation being performed.

Should we isolate ImageMagick from untrusted input until we can patch?

Yes, implementing additional controls is prudent. Run ImageMagick in a sandbox, container, or chroot with restricted resource limits. Ensure the process runs with the lowest required privilege level. Process untrusted images in isolated environments separate from sensitive data.

This analysis is provided for informational purposes and reflects the vulnerability details as published. CVSS scores, affected versions, and patch information are accurate as of the date of this analysis. Organizations should verify patch availability and compatibility with their specific ImageMagick deployments before applying updates. No exploit code or detailed attack steps are provided. Security decisions should incorporate your organization's specific risk tolerance, privilege model, and operational environment. Consult vendor advisories and test patches in non-production environments before broad deployment. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-08-17. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).