CVE-2026-56266: Crawl4AI Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via IPv6-Mapped IPv4 Bypass
Crawl4AI, a web scraping and content processing tool, contains a server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to make the server fetch arbitrary URLs. By crafting IPv6-mapped IPv4 addresses, attackers can bypass the application's blocklist protections and reach internal services or cloud metadata endpoints—such as AWS Instance Metadata Service—that should be inaccessible. This affects versions prior to 0.8.7.
Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain
- CVSS
- 3.1 · 8.6 HIGH · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
- Weaknesses (CWE)
- CWE-918
- Affected products
- 1 configuration(s)
- Published / Modified
- 2026-06-22 / 2026-06-30
NVD description (verbatim)
Crawl4AI before 0.8.7 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the /crawl, /crawl/stream, /md, and /llm endpoints that fetch arbitrary user-supplied URLs without validation. Unauthenticated attackers can bypass the internal-address blocklist using IPv6-mapped IPv4 addresses to reach internal services and cloud metadata endpoints.
3 reference(s) · View on NVD →
SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source
Technical summary
CVE-2026-56266 is a Server-Side Request Forgery (CWE-918) vulnerability in Crawl4AI's /crawl, /crawl/stream, /md, and /llm endpoints. The application fetches user-supplied URLs without proper validation or IP address filtering. Specifically, the internal-address blocklist can be circumvented using IPv6-mapped IPv4 address notation (::ffff:127.0.0.1 format) to reach localhost and private IP ranges. This allows unauthenticated network attackers to trigger requests to restricted internal hosts and cloud metadata services with a CVSS 3.1 score of 8.6 (High severity).
Business impact
An attacker exploiting this vulnerability could extract sensitive metadata from cloud environments (such as IAM credentials, instance details, and secrets), enumerate or interact with internal APIs and services, or pivot laterally within the network from the Crawl4AI host. Organizations using Crawl4AI as a public-facing service or in environments where the host has network access to sensitive internal resources face significant exposure. Data confidentiality is at high risk; integrity and availability are not directly impacted by this flaw.
Affected systems
Crawl4AI versions before 0.8.7 are vulnerable. Check your installed version immediately. Any deployment of Crawl4AI—whether as a library, containerized service, or API endpoint—that receives user-supplied URLs is at risk if it has not been patched. Organizations should inventory all instances, particularly those exposed to untrusted users or integrated with CI/CD pipelines or automation workflows.
Exploitability
Exploitation requires no authentication, no user interaction, and is trivial from a network perspective: an attacker sends a malicious HTTP request with an IPv6-mapped IPv4 address pointing to an internal target. The attack is reliable and can be automated. The primary barrier is network visibility—the attacker must know or guess valid internal IP addresses or cloud metadata service URLs. Public cloud environments and internal networks are obvious targets. Current exploit code is not widely documented, but the attack is straightforward enough that any competent security researcher can craft a working proof-of-concept.
Remediation
Upgrade Crawl4AI to version 0.8.7 or later. Verify the patch against the vendor advisory before deployment. Additionally, implement network segmentation to restrict egress from Crawl4AI hosts to only necessary external services; block or filter IPv6-mapped IPv4 addresses at the network or application level; disable or restrict access to cloud metadata endpoints (e.g., 169.254.169.254) from the host; and apply principle of least privilege to the service account running Crawl4AI.
Patch guidance
Update to Crawl4AI 0.8.7 or newer. Consult the vendor's release notes and advisory for specific patch details and any configuration changes required. Test the patched version in a staging environment to ensure compatibility with your existing integrations before production rollout. If upgrading is delayed, apply the compensating controls listed in the remediation summary.
Detection guidance
Monitor network traffic from Crawl4AI hosts for outbound requests to private IP ranges (10.0.0.0/8, 172.16.0.0/12, 192.168.0.0/16), localhost (127.0.0.1), or cloud metadata endpoints (169.254.169.254). Flag any requests containing IPv6-mapped IPv4 notation (::ffff:x.x.x.x). Review application logs for unusual URL patterns in /crawl, /crawl/stream, /md, and /llm endpoint requests. Set up alerting on DNS queries or connection attempts to internal hostnames or IP addresses originating from Crawl4AI processes.
Why prioritize this
This vulnerability merits immediate attention due to its high CVSS score (8.6), unauthenticated attack vector, and potential to expose sensitive cloud credentials and internal services. While not yet in the KEV catalog, the ease of exploitation and the sensitive nature of SSRF attacks in cloud environments make this a top priority for any organization running Crawl4AI.
Risk score, explained
The CVSS 3.1 score of 8.6 reflects a network-accessible vulnerability (AV:N) requiring no authentication (PR:N) or user interaction (UI:N), with low complexity (AC:L), that impacts confidentiality at the highest level (C:H) across scope boundaries (S:C). The lack of direct impact to integrity or availability prevents a critical rating, but the high confidentiality risk from metadata and credential exposure justifies the HIGH severity classification.
Frequently asked questions
What is an IPv6-mapped IPv4 address and why does it bypass the blocklist?
IPv6-mapped IPv4 addresses use the format ::ffff:x.x.x.x to represent IPv4 addresses within the IPv6 namespace. If Crawl4AI's blocklist only checks for dotted-decimal IPv4 notation (e.g., 127.0.0.1) or does not validate IPv6 address parsing, an attacker can provide the same address in IPv6 notation and bypass the filter. For example, ::ffff:127.0.0.1 reaches localhost but may not match a blocklist rule for 127.0.0.1.
Can this vulnerability be exploited from the internet if Crawl4AI is on an internal network?
Yes, if Crawl4AI is exposed to the internet (even in a 'private' deployment), an attacker can send requests to it and trick it into fetching internal URLs. The vulnerability lies in the server itself, not in network topology. However, the attacker must either know or guess the internal IP addresses or service hostnames they wish to target.
Does upgrading to 0.8.7 fully protect us, or should we also apply network controls?
Patching is the primary remediation, but defense in depth is essential. Even after upgrading, implement network segmentation, restrict egress to necessary external destinations, block metadata endpoint access, and monitor outbound traffic. This limits the blast radius if a new SSRF variant is discovered or if unpatched instances exist elsewhere in your environment.
What is the difference between this and a simple open proxy vulnerability?
Both involve the server fetching remote content, but this SSRF specifically allows bypass of intended internal-address protections via address format obfuscation. A simple open proxy might allow any outbound request; this vulnerability is insidious because it defeats a blocklist that was meant to prevent exactly this kind of internal access.
This analysis is based on publicly disclosed vulnerability data as of June 2026. It does not constitute legal, compliance, or actionable security advice for your specific environment. Verify all patch versions and guidance against the vendor's official advisory and your organization's policies. Test patches in non-production environments before deployment. This intelligence is provided for informational purposes; organizations must conduct their own risk assessments and remediation planning. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-07-28. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).
Related vulnerabilities
- CVE-2026-10068HIGHSSRF in Shibby Tomato 1.28 miniupnpd (Unmaintained)
- CVE-2026-10107HIGHMoviePilot v2 SSRF in Image Proxy Allows Internal Network Access
- CVE-2026-10280HIGHServer-Side Request Forgery in Horizon921 mcpilot 0.1.0
- CVE-2026-10287HIGHSSRF in SourceCodester SEO Meta Tag Extractor 1.0
- CVE-2026-10586HIGHGutenberg Essential Blocks SSRF Vulnerability – High Risk Server-Side Request Forgery
- CVE-2026-10771HIGHCRMEB Java SSRF Vulnerability in QR Code Endpoint
- CVE-2026-11395HIGHCF7 to Webhook Plugin SSRF Vulnerability (WordPress)
- CVE-2026-11437HIGHServer-Side Request Forgery in go-fastdfs-web 1.3.7 and Earlier