HIGH 7.5

CVE-2026-55677: Echo Web Framework Path Traversal in Static File Handler

Echo, a popular Go web framework, has a critical path-handling flaw where its URL router and static file handler interpret encoded paths differently. An attacker can craft URLs with encoded forward slashes (%2F) to bypass access controls and read files that should be protected. The mismatch means the router approves the request, but the file handler decodes the path and serves content it shouldn't. This affects versions before 4.15.3 and 5.2.0.

Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain

CVSS
3.1 · 7.5 HIGH · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Weaknesses (CWE)
CWE-22
Affected products
0 configuration(s)
Published / Modified
2026-06-26 / 2026-06-26

NVD description (verbatim)

Echo is a Go web framework. Prior to 4.15.3 and 5.2.0, Echo's router and static file handler disagree on URL path decoding. The router matches routes using the raw encoded path (preserving %2F as-is), while StaticDirectoryHandler unescapes %2F to / before resolving filesystem paths. This allows an attacker to bypass route-level access controls and read static files without authorization. This vulnerability is fixed in 4.15.3 and 5.2.0.

2 reference(s) · View on NVD →

SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source

Technical summary

Echo's router evaluates routes against the raw, URL-encoded path (treating %2F as a literal sequence), while StaticDirectoryHandler unescapes percent-encoded characters before filesystem resolution. This inconsistency in path normalization allows an attacker to craft requests like /protected%2F..%2F../sensitive.txt that pass router validation but resolve to unauthorized files after decoding. The vulnerability is rooted in CWE-22 (Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory) and affects Echo versions prior to 4.15.3 (v4 branch) and 5.2.0 (v5 branch).

Business impact

Any application using Echo's StaticDirectoryHandler to serve restricted static assets is vulnerable to unauthorized file disclosure. An attacker can read configuration files, source code, private keys, or other sensitive data without authentication. This is particularly dangerous for single-page applications or microservices that rely on Echo's static file serving for non-public content or that have conditional access logic in the router.

Affected systems

Echo web framework versions 4.x prior to 4.15.3 and 5.x prior to 5.2.0. Applications using StaticDirectoryHandler for path-based access control are at highest risk. Those relying exclusively on external reverse proxies or middleware-layer auth may have reduced exposure, depending on configuration.

Exploitability

Exploitation requires no authentication, no special privileges, and no user interaction. An attacker simply crafts HTTP requests with percent-encoded path traversal sequences. The attack surface is the static file serving endpoint itself. No CVSS score downgrades apply; this is a straightforward remote bypass with a CVSS 3.1 score of 7.5 (HIGH).

Remediation

Upgrade Echo to version 4.15.3 or later (v4 users) or 5.2.0 or later (v5 users). Both versions implement consistent path normalization between the router and static file handler. No workarounds are practical without code modification; patching is the only reliable fix.

Patch guidance

For Go projects using Echo as a dependency: update go.mod to reference echo v4.15.3+ or echo v5.2.0+, then run 'go get -u' and 'go mod tidy'. Rebuild and redeploy applications. Verify the upgrade in your build and staging environments before production rollout. Check your go.sum file to confirm the new version is locked.

Detection guidance

Monitor HTTP request logs for patterns like %2F in static file paths, especially combined with ../ or path traversal-like sequences. Analyze access logs for requests to StaticDirectoryHandler endpoints that contain percent-encoded characters. Implement filesystem-level auditing on static file directories to detect unexpected file reads. Source code scanning can identify Echo usage and version pinning to flag vulnerable deployments.

Why prioritize this

HIGH priority. The vulnerability is unauthenticated, requires no user interaction, and directly enables unauthorized file access. While not in the CISA KEV catalog, it poses immediate risk to confidentiality. Any organization serving sensitive static content via Echo should patch urgently.

Risk score, explained

CVSS 3.1 score of 7.5 reflects high attack complexity (network-only, no auth required), high impact on confidentiality (full file disclosure), and no integrity or availability impact. The vector AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N captures the unauthenticated remote nature and file read capability without system compromise.

Frequently asked questions

Does this affect applications that only serve public static content?

No, if your static files are intended to be publicly readable, the vulnerability has no practical impact. Risk is highest when static directories contain sensitive data or when access is meant to be conditional (e.g., authenticated users only).

Can middleware-based authentication prevent exploitation?

Middleware that runs before route matching is not bypassed by this flaw. However, if you rely on route-level @guard or role-based handlers that check the raw path, an attacker can still bypass them by exploiting the path normalization mismatch in StaticDirectoryHandler itself.

What if we use a reverse proxy (nginx, Envoy) in front of Echo?

Reverse proxies add a layer of defense by normalizing paths before forwarding, but do not eliminate the vulnerability in Echo itself. Best practice is to patch Echo and rely on defense-in-depth.

Is there a way to detect if my Echo instance is vulnerable without upgrading?

Check your go.mod or go.sum for Echo version. Vulnerable if you have v4.x < 4.15.3 or v5.x < 5.2.0. You can also review your router and static handler configuration; if you serve static files with Echo's built-in handler, assume you are vulnerable until patched.

This analysis is based on the vulnerability description and CVSS vector provided. Vendor-specific product names and patch availability have not been included per available data. Organizations should verify patch applicability against the official Echo GitHub repository and their specific version pins before deployment. No exploit code or proof-of-concept is provided. This information is for defensive security purposes only. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-08-05. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).