MEDIUM 5.5

CVE-2026-55628: ImageMagick Policy Bypass in -concatenate Operation

ImageMagick's `-concatenate` operation fails to enforce security policies that restrict file access, allowing users to read and write files outside approved paths. This vulnerability affects ImageMagick versions prior to 7.1.2-26 and requires user interaction to exploit—an attacker would need to trick someone into running a specially crafted ImageMagick command. The issue has been resolved in version 7.1.2-26 and later.

Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain

CVSS
3.1 · 5.5 MEDIUM · CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Weaknesses (CWE)
CWE-73, CWE-862
Affected products
0 configuration(s)
Published / Modified
2026-07-01 / 2026-07-29

NVD description (verbatim)

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. In versions prior to 7.1.2-26he, the `-concatenate` operation is missing policy checks, potentially resulting in both reading and writing to paths disallowed by the security policy. This issue has been fixed in version 7.1.2-26.

1 reference(s) · View on NVD →

SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source

Technical summary

CVE-2026-55628 is a policy enforcement bypass in ImageMagick's concatenate image operation. The `-concatenate` function does not properly validate file paths against the configured security policy before accessing the filesystem. This allows both read and write operations on files and directories that should be blocked by policy rules. The vulnerability affects versions prior to 7.1.2-26. The issue is classified as CWE-73 (External Control of File Name or Path) and CWE-862 (Missing Authorization), indicating inadequate access control mechanisms.

Business impact

Organizations using ImageMagick for automated image processing or as part of a service (such as image conversion APIs, document rendering systems, or content management platforms) face potential data exposure if an attacker submits a malicious image that causes the tool to read sensitive files. Additionally, policy-constrained ImageMagick deployments designed to sandbox image processing lose that protection, potentially allowing unauthorized file modification or deletion. The actual business risk depends heavily on whether ImageMagick runs with elevated privileges, how user-supplied content reaches it, and what files it has access to.

Affected systems

ImageMagick versions prior to 7.1.2-26 are affected. The vulnerability requires local code execution or user interaction with untrusted image files. Organizations should inventory ImageMagick deployments across development tools, server-side image processing pipelines, container images, and systems where it may be embedded as a dependency. Both direct command-line usage and library integration via bindings (Python, Ruby, PHP, etc.) are in scope.

Exploitability

Exploitability is moderate and requires user interaction. An attacker cannot remotely trigger this flaw by simply sending a network request; they must either convince a user to process a crafted image or submit a malicious image to a service that processes user uploads. The attack surface is local (requires filesystem access to paths that would normally be blocked). No known public exploit code or active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed at this time.

Remediation

Upgrade ImageMagick to version 7.1.2-26 or later. Prior to patching, restrict ImageMagick's filesystem permissions using operating system controls (file permissions, AppArmor, SELinux) and avoid processing untrusted image files in production environments. Validate and sanitize image file sources before processing.

Patch guidance

Upgrade to ImageMagick 7.1.2-26 or any release version after this patch. Verify the installed version using `identify -version` or your package manager. Most Linux distributions will publish updates through their security repositories. Verify against the official ImageMagick website (imagemagick.org) for the latest stable release and security advisories. Coordinate upgrades with testing to ensure compatibility with dependent applications and custom workflows.

Detection guidance

Monitor for ImageMagick process execution with unusual file paths or the `-concatenate` flag applied to untrusted image sources. Review container images and build artifacts for vulnerable ImageMagick versions. Audit system logs for unauthorized file access attempts from ImageMagick processes. In web services, log and alert on image upload attempts that contain suspicious path traversal patterns or unusual concatenation operations.

Why prioritize this

Although the CVSS score is moderate (5.5), prioritize this based on your organization's specific usage of ImageMagick. If it processes user-supplied images, runs as a service, or has access to sensitive data, this becomes high priority due to policy bypass implications. If ImageMagick is isolated to development tools on restricted systems, priority can be lower. The lack of KEV status and public exploitation suggests less immediate pressure than zero-day variants, but policy-bypass vulnerabilities warrant timely attention.

Risk score, explained

The CVSS 3.1 score of 5.5 (Medium) reflects a local attack vector (AV:L), low complexity (AC:L), no privilege requirement (PR:N), but requiring user interaction (UI:R). The severity is anchored by high availability impact (A:H)—the ability to delete or corrupt files—while integrity and confidentiality impacts are not directly scored. The moderate score does not capture the full policy-bypass nature; organizations relying on ImageMagick's policy mechanism for isolation should treat this as more severe in their context.

Frequently asked questions

Do I need to patch if ImageMagick is only used by trusted developers in a sandbox environment?

If only trusted users execute ImageMagick commands on images they control, the attack surface is minimal. However, if there is any risk of developers accidentally processing untrusted images or if the tool is shared across teams, patching is prudent to maintain defense-in-depth and avoid inadvertent policy bypasses.

Is there a workaround if I cannot patch immediately?

Yes. Disable the `-concatenate` operation if it is not required. Use filesystem permissions and OS-level sandboxing (containers, AppArmor, SELinux) to restrict ImageMagick's read and write access to only necessary directories. However, these are temporary measures; upgrade as soon as feasible.

Does this affect ImageMagick when used as a library in Python/PHP/Ruby?

Yes. Any binding or integration that exposes ImageMagick's `-concatenate` operation is affected. Review your application's image processing code and the ImageMagick version it links against. Update both the ImageMagick library and dependent language bindings to current versions.

What file types or operations should trigger concern?

Focus on untrusted image uploads or batch image processing workflows. Any scenario where user-controlled input (filenames, image data, command parameters) could influence ImageMagick operations warrants caution. The `-concatenate` flag is the specific vector, but best practice is to avoid passing user input directly to ImageMagick commands.

This analysis is based on publicly available information as of July 2026. Vulnerability details, patch availability, and threat status may change. Verify all patch versions and compatibility against official vendor advisories before deploying updates. This guidance does not constitute legal or compliance advice. Consult your security team and vendor documentation for environment-specific remediation decisions. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-08-10. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).