CVE-2026-55153: mchange-commons-java JNDI ObjectFactory Deserialization & SSRF Vulnerability
mchange-commons-java, a widely-used Java utility library, contains a critical flaw in how it handles JNDI object construction. Before version 0.6.0, the library's ObjectFactory can be tricked into creating and configuring arbitrary Java objects. An attacker who can control serialized data reaching your application can exploit this to trigger unsafe initialization sequences—for instance, making a Swing component fetch content from a malicious URL. This is particularly dangerous because the attack often occurs within the trusted security context of your application.
Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain
- CVSS
- 3.1 · 7.1 HIGH · CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
- Weaknesses (CWE)
- CWE-470, CWE-502
- Affected products
- 0 configuration(s)
- Published / Modified
- 2026-07-01 / 2026-07-06
NVD description (verbatim)
mchange-commons-java is a Java library of shared utility classes used by mchange projects like the c3p0 connection pool. Prior to version 0.6.0, its JNDI ObjectFactory implementation (com.mchange.v2.naming.JavaBeanObjectFactory) will construct objects of arbitrary classes and initialize "JavaBean"-style properties, which for certain classes enables JNDI injection and "deserialization gadgets." Such initialization is unsafe for some classes: for example, setting the contentType property of a Swing JEditorPane to text/html and its text property to HTML containing a stylesheet <link> will provoke an HTTP GET on an arbitrary URL, potentially from within a trusted security domain. The problem is aggravated by the library's ReferenceIndirector, through which malicious JNDI Reference objects can be smuggled in for dereferencing wherever an application reads a Java-serialized object. This has been resolved in version 0.6.0.
1 reference(s) · View on NVD →
SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source
Technical summary
CVE-2026-55153 exploits unsafe JavaBean property initialization in mchange-commons-java's com.mchange.v2.naming.JavaBeanObjectFactory class. The vulnerability stems from two mechanisms: (1) arbitrary class instantiation combined with reflective property-setting, and (2) the ReferenceIndirector facility that allows malicious JNDI Reference objects to be embedded in serialized data and dereferenced during deserialization. Certain Swing components (e.g., JEditorPane) become gadgets when their properties are set—configuring contentType to 'text/html' and text to HTML with stylesheet links causes HTTP requests to attacker-controlled URLs. The attack vector requires local network access and authenticated context (CVSS vector AV:A, PR:L), but initialization happens without explicit user interaction (UI:N).
Business impact
Organizations using mchange-commons-java (or dependent projects like c3p0 connection pools) face data exfiltration and server-side request forgery (SSRF) risks. An authenticated attacker on the network can craft malicious serialized objects to trigger HTTP requests from your application server—potentially accessing internal services, stealing credentials, or probing infrastructure. The impact is elevated for microservices architectures and cloud deployments where applications process untrusted serialized data from message queues, caches, or inter-service calls.
Affected systems
Any Java application directly using mchange-commons-java versions prior to 0.6.0 is at risk. Indirect exposure occurs in projects that depend on c3p0 (a popular JDBC connection pool) or other mchange utilities. Check your dependency trees and Maven Central records for mchange-commons-java artifacts. The vulnerability requires both a local network vantage point and authenticated session context, narrowing the attack surface somewhat, but doesn't eliminate risk in internal networks or compromised-credential scenarios.
Exploitability
Exploitation requires (1) ability to reach the target application over a local network (AV:A), (2) an authenticated user context (PR:L), and (3) the ability to inject malicious serialized Java objects into the application's processing pipeline—through databases, message brokers, cache stores, or JNDI lookups. While not trivially exploitable from the internet, the bar is low for insider threats or attackers with lateral movement in a corporate network. Public exploit code has not been designated as officially available (KEV status: false), but the attack is straightforward once serialized gadgets are constructed.
Remediation
Upgrade mchange-commons-java to version 0.6.0 or later immediately. This version hardens the ObjectFactory to prevent unsafe property initialization. Simultaneously, audit your application's serialization boundaries: identify where untrusted serialized objects enter (message queues, RPC, cache, JNDI), apply input validation, and consider disabling Java deserialization where feasible. In defense-in-depth, restrict outbound HTTP access from application servers to known-good destinations and monitor for unexpected requests to internal services.
Patch guidance
Apply the upgrade to mchange-commons-java 0.6.0 as a priority patch. If your application uses c3p0, verify that your c3p0 version depends on (or is compatible with) the patched mchange-commons-java release; consult c3p0 release notes to confirm. Rebuild and test your application thoroughly in a staging environment before production deployment, as utility library updates can sometimes introduce subtle behavioral changes. Pin the dependency version explicitly in your build configuration to prevent accidental downgrades.
Detection guidance
Monitor for suspicious serialized object deserialization attempts: check application logs and Java security manager traces for ObjectFactory instantiation of unexpected classes, particularly Swing components. Network-level detection should flag unexpected HTTP requests originating from application servers, especially to internal IPs or non-whitelisted domains. If you use a WAF or IDS, tune rules to catch serialized Java gadget patterns in traffic destined for your app. Heap dumps and JVM profiling can reveal instantiation of unusual classes during normal operation, serving as a baseline for detecting malicious activity.
Why prioritize this
This vulnerability merits immediate attention despite a CVSS score of 7.1 and limited initial-access complexity. The combination of deserialization gadgets, network-adjacent attack vector, and SSRF/data exfiltration impact creates a realistic threat in multi-tenant and internal-network environments. The lack of KEV designation does not imply low risk—it reflects absence of widespread in-the-wild exploitation at publication, not absence of weaponization capability. Organizations should prioritize this at the same level as known-exploited deserialization flaws.
Risk score, explained
CVSS 7.1 (HIGH) reflects: (1) High confidentiality and integrity impact (HTTP requests to arbitrary URLs, potential credential/data theft), (2) local network access requirement (reducing random-internet attack surface), and (3) authenticated context requirement (lowering probability for unauthenticated adversaries). The vector AV:A/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N indicates a non-trivial but feasible attack requiring local presence, authentication, and likely some reconnaissance or application-specific knowledge. The score does not diminish the risk in insider-threat or lateral-movement scenarios common in enterprise security assessments.
Frequently asked questions
Does this affect my Java application if it doesn't directly use mchange-commons-java?
Possibly. Check your dependency tree (e.g., mvn dependency:tree) for transitive dependencies. If your application uses c3p0, HikariCP, or other connection pools, or any mchange-authored utility, you may inherit the vulnerable library. Maven Central and your build tool can reveal indirect imports. If unsure, contact the library vendor or perform a classpath scan.
What is the ReferenceIndirector and why is it mentioned in the vulnerability description?
The ReferenceIndirector is a mchange-commons mechanism that allows Java JNDI Reference objects to be embedded and dereferenced within serialized data. It acts as a vector for smuggling malicious JNDI references into your application's deserialization pipeline. Even if your code doesn't directly construct JNDI objects, the ReferenceIndirector can transparently trigger their creation during object deserialization, bypassing some intuitive security assumptions.
Is there a workaround if I cannot immediately upgrade?
Full workaround is limited, but mitigation includes: (1) disable Java deserialization where possible, (2) use a serialization filter (JEP 290) to block mchange and Swing gadget classes, (3) restrict network access from your application servers to trusted internal hosts only, and (4) disable JNDI or restrict JNDI factory classes. These are stopgaps; upgrading is the proper fix. Consult your vendor and CISA for serialization-hardening guidance.
How does this differ from other Java deserialization vulnerabilities like log4j or commons-beanutils?
Like those, it exploits Java's serialization model and gadget chains, but it is specific to mchange-commons-java's ObjectFactory logic. It does not require external command execution (commons-beanutils) or logging infrastructure (log4j), making it a narrower but still serious attack surface. The SSRF via Swing component initialization is the distinguishing gadget; other vulnerabilities often focus on remote code execution.
This analysis is provided for informational purposes to support vulnerability management and incident response decisions. It does not constitute legal advice or a guarantee of security. Organizations must conduct their own risk assessments and testing before deploying patches. Verify all patch versions, CVE details, and vendor guidance directly from official sources. SEC.co makes no warranty regarding the completeness or accuracy of vendor product lists or the absence of affected systems in any particular environment. Always test patches in staging before production deployment. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-08-10. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).
Related vulnerabilities
- CVE-2026-48502HIGHMessagePack for C# Stack Overflow in Timestamp Parsing
- CVE-2026-48517HIGHMessagePack-CSharp Type-Filtering Bypass in Typeless Deserialization
- CVE-2025-11993HIGHWooCommerce Infinite Scroll Plugin PHP Object Injection – HIGH Severity
- CVE-2025-27511HIGHGeoServer DB2 JNDI Injection Remote Code Execution
- CVE-2025-69130HIGHPHP Object Injection in Entrepreneur WordPress Booking Theme ≤3.1.3
- CVE-2025-71339HIGHPicklescan Gadget Bypass Allows Arbitrary Code Execution
- CVE-2025-71340HIGHPicklescan Evasion via idlelib.pyshell.ModifiedInterpreter
- CVE-2025-71341HIGHPicklescan Bypass Enables Remote Code Execution via profile.Profile.runctx