CVE-2026-54842: Missing Authorization in Royal MCP Plugin – CVSS 8.1 High
A missing authorization vulnerability in Royal Plugins' Royal MCP allows users with low-level login credentials to perform sensitive actions they shouldn't be allowed to perform. An attacker with a valid standard user account can exploit incorrectly configured access controls to gain unauthorized capabilities. The vulnerability affects Royal MCP versions up to and including 1.4.25. While authentication is required to exploit this issue, the low barrier to entry—needing only basic user credentials—makes this a meaningful risk for organizations using this plugin.
Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain
- CVSS
- 3.1 · 8.1 HIGH · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
- Weaknesses (CWE)
- CWE-862
- Affected products
- 0 configuration(s)
- Published / Modified
- 2026-06-25 / 2026-06-25
NVD description (verbatim)
Missing Authorization vulnerability in Royal Plugins Royal MCP allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels. This issue affects Royal MCP: from n/a through 1.4.25.
1 reference(s) · View on NVD →
SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source
Technical summary
CVE-2026-54842 is a CWE-862 Missing Authorization vulnerability in Royal MCP that stems from improper enforcement of access control security levels. The vulnerability permits authenticated users with lower privilege levels to bypass authorization checks and execute privileged operations. The CVSS 3.1 vector (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N) indicates network-accessible exploitation requiring only low privileges and no user interaction, with high confidentiality and integrity impact but no availability impact. This is a classic privilege escalation scenario where authorization logic either fails to validate user roles or applies insufficient restrictions on sensitive endpoints.
Business impact
The ability for standard users to access or modify data and functionality reserved for administrators or privileged accounts creates significant operational and compliance risk. Depending on what Royal MCP manages in your environment, this could result in unauthorized data access, configuration tampering, or privilege escalation paths. Organizations subject to regulatory frameworks requiring role-based access controls (SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, PCI-DSS, etc.) may face compliance gaps. The vulnerability requires valid credentials, so insider threats or compromised low-privilege accounts become direct vectors to sensitive systems.
Affected systems
Royal MCP versions from the earliest available through 1.4.25 are vulnerable. The vendor product list is not yet fully enumerated in available data; verify your Royal MCP deployment version and confirm whether your instance is affected by checking the vendor advisory. Organizations should inventory all deployments of Royal Plugins' Royal MCP and identify the currently installed versions.
Exploitability
Exploitation requires valid user credentials with standard (non-privileged) access. An attacker cannot exploit this vulnerability from the internet without first obtaining legitimate login credentials; however, once those credentials are in hand, the network-accessible nature and straightforward authorization bypass make exploitation practical with minimal technical complexity. Insiders or attackers who have compromised a standard user account can immediately leverage this flaw.
Remediation
Update Royal MCP to a patched version released by Royal Plugins. Verify the specific patch version from the vendor advisory, as version numbering and release dates are subject to vendor timelines. If an immediate patch is unavailable, apply compensating controls such as restricting who holds standard user accounts, implementing network segmentation to limit access to Royal MCP, and monitoring for privilege escalation attempts.
Patch guidance
Contact Royal Plugins or check their security advisory page for the patched version that addresses CVE-2026-54842. Prioritize testing the patch in a non-production environment first, as access control changes can affect dependent workflows. After validation, schedule a maintenance window to deploy the update across all instances of Royal MCP in your organization.
Detection guidance
Monitor for unusual privilege escalation patterns: watch for standard user accounts performing administrative or privileged operations (configuration changes, sensitive data access, privilege grant attempts) that fall outside normal workflow. Log aggregation and SIEM rules that correlate standard-user accounts with high-sensitivity operations can surface exploitation attempts. Audit access control settings in Royal MCP to ensure they are correctly configured and reflect intended role separation.
Why prioritize this
HIGH severity (CVSS 8.1) with high confidentiality and integrity impact. The requirement for valid credentials reduces immediate external risk, but the low attack complexity and network accessibility mean that any compromised standard user account becomes a stepping stone to privilege escalation. Organizations with multiple standard users, guest accounts, or legacy shared credentials face elevated exposure.
Risk score, explained
The CVSS 3.1 score of 8.1 (HIGH) reflects the combination of network accessibility, low attack complexity, required but low privilege level, and high confidentiality and integrity impact. The absence of availability impact prevents a critical rating. For your organization, the actual risk depends on how broadly standard user accounts are distributed, whether credentials are regularly rotated, and what sensitive functions Royal MCP controls in your infrastructure.
Frequently asked questions
Do I need valid credentials to exploit this vulnerability?
Yes. CVE-2026-54842 requires authentication—specifically, a valid standard user account. An attacker cannot exploit this from the internet without first obtaining legitimate login credentials. However, obtaining such credentials through phishing, credential leaks, or insider threats is a realistic attack vector.
What should I do if I haven't updated to a patched version yet?
Immediately identify all deployments of Royal MCP and their versions. If any are at 1.4.25 or below, prioritize testing and deploying the vendor patch. In the interim, restrict who is granted standard user accounts, implement IP whitelisting if possible, and strengthen monitoring for unauthorized privilege escalation activity.
How is this different from a typical privilege escalation vulnerability?
This is a privilege escalation vulnerability—a lower-privilege user escalates to higher capabilities than their role permits. The distinction here is that it stems from missing authorization checks rather than a logic flaw, meaning the application simply isn't validating whether the user should be allowed to perform the action they're requesting.
Is this vulnerability exploited in the wild?
CVE-2026-54842 is not currently listed on the CISA KEV catalog, meaning there is no confirmed active exploitation in widespread use as of the vulnerability's publication date. However, the relatively straightforward nature of authorization bypass vulnerabilities and the low barrier to entry mean organizations should not assume the vulnerability will remain unexamined by threat actors.
This analysis is provided for informational purposes and does not constitute legal or professional security advice. The vulnerability details, affected versions, and patch guidance are based on published CVE records; verify all information against the official Royal Plugins security advisory and your own environment. CVSS scores are provided by the CVE record and are approximate measures of severity; actual impact depends on your deployment, network architecture, and data sensitivity. No active exploit code, proof-of-concept, or weaponization guidance is provided. Organizations should conduct their own risk assessments and consult with professional security advisors before making remediation decisions. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-08-03. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).
Weaknesses (CWE)
Related vulnerabilities
- CVE-2018-25391HIGHHaPe PKH 1.1 Authorization Bypass – Unauthorized Record Deletion Vulnerability
- CVE-2024-32949HIGHMissing Authorization in Prince Integrate Google Drive — HIGH Risk
- CVE-2025-26418HIGHAndroid CarDevicePolicyService Privilege Escalation (CVSS 7.8)
- CVE-2025-48617HIGHAndroid CarrierConfigLoader Privilege Escalation Vulnerability
- CVE-2025-48640HIGHAndroid Passkey Permission Bypass Privilege Escalation
- CVE-2025-53345HIGHThimPress Thim Core Missing Authorization Leads to Code Execution
- CVE-2025-69189HIGHEMV JobBank Missing Authorization Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-0071HIGHAndroid SettingsLib Privilege Escalation Vulnerability