CVE-2026-54672: electron-updater AppImage Library Path Hijacking (CVSS 7.8)
electron-updater, a component used to deploy automatic updates in Electron-based applications, contains a privilege escalation vulnerability affecting versions before 26.15.0. When AppImage packages are built using app-builder-lib, the dynamic library loader path (LD_LIBRARY_PATH) is set with an empty component that causes the current working directory to be searched for shared libraries. An attacker with local access can exploit this by placing a malicious library in the directory where an AppImage is executed, leading to arbitrary code execution with the privileges of the user running the application.
Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain
- CVSS
- 3.1 · 7.8 HIGH · CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
- Weaknesses (CWE)
- CWE-427
- Affected products
- 0 configuration(s)
- Published / Modified
- 2026-06-30 / 2026-07-02
NVD description (verbatim)
electron-updater allows for automatic updates for Electron apps. Prior to 26.15.0, AppImage targets built by app-builder-lib could use an empty path component when setting the LD_LIBRARY_PATH environment variable at runtime. This causes the current working directory to be added to the dynamic linker search path, which may allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code by placing a malicious shared library in the directory from which the AppImage is launched. This issue has been fixed in version 26.15.0.
2 reference(s) · View on NVD →
SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source
Technical summary
The vulnerability stems from improper environment variable configuration in electron-updater and app-builder-lib when constructing AppImage targets. Specifically, LD_LIBRARY_PATH is set with an empty path element, which the Linux dynamic linker interprets as the current working directory (.). This allows an attacker to perform DLL hijacking by crafting a malicious shared library (.so file) with a name matching one that the AppImage will load at startup. When the AppImage executes, the linker searches the current directory first, loads the attacker's library, and executes arbitrary code in the application's security context. The issue is rooted in CWE-427 (Uncontrolled Search Path Element), a known weak link in library resolution chains. The fix in version 26.15.0 removes the empty path component from LD_LIBRARY_PATH configuration.
Business impact
Organizations distributing Electron-based applications via AppImage packages built with affected versions face significant risk. Any user who downloads and runs the AppImage from a directory the attacker controls—such as a shared folder, Downloads directory seeded with malicious files, or even a temporary extraction location—could have their system compromised. This is particularly dangerous for productivity applications, development tools, and enterprise software where the application runs with the user's full privileges. The impact extends beyond individual users; if AppImages are distributed through corporate deployment channels or public repositories without proper signature verification, the attack surface widens considerably. Reputational damage and potential supply-chain liability are additional concerns.
Affected systems
Any Electron application built using electron-updater versions prior to 26.15.0 with AppImage targets generated by app-builder-lib is vulnerable. This includes applications distributed as AppImage packages (the .AppImage file format). No specific vendor or product list is available in the advisory, but the vulnerability affects the build infrastructure and update mechanism, not a single application—all Electron apps using this update chain are at risk. Desktop Linux environments are the primary target; the attack requires local file system access.
Exploitability
Exploitation requires an attacker to place a malicious shared library in the working directory from which the AppImage is launched. This is a local attack with low complexity—the attacker needs only write access to a directory where the user will run the AppImage and knowledge of a library name the application will attempt to load. No user interaction beyond normal app execution is required, and no privilege escalation is needed to place the malicious file in a shared or user-writable directory. The CVSS 3.1 score of 7.8 (HIGH) reflects this: local access, low attack complexity, low privileges, and high impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. However, the attack does require the attacker to predict or observe which libraries the application loads—not a trivial task without reverse engineering or debugging the AppImage.
Remediation
Update electron-updater to version 26.15.0 or later, and rebuild all AppImage targets using an updated version of app-builder-lib that does not introduce empty path components into LD_LIBRARY_PATH. Organizations should also audit their current AppImage distributions to identify which were built with vulnerable versions. For applications already distributed, consider issuing a new release with the patched update mechanism to ensure users receive the fix automatically. As an interim measure, educate users not to extract or run AppImage files from untrusted directories or directories containing files from unknown sources.
Patch guidance
Apply electron-updater version 26.15.0 or later in your Electron application's build configuration. Rebuild your AppImage packages to incorporate the patched library. Test the rebuilt AppImage thoroughly in your deployment environment to confirm the update mechanism functions correctly and that no legitimate library search paths are broken. If you use app-builder-lib separately, ensure it is also updated. Verify the fix by inspecting the LD_LIBRARY_PATH configuration in the generated AppImage—it should not contain empty path elements. Coordinate with your application's release schedule to deliver the patched version to all users via auto-update or direct release channels.
Detection guidance
Monitor for suspicious .so files placed in common application launch directories (Downloads, Desktop, /tmp, shared network folders) that match library names known to be loaded by Electron applications. Review LD_LIBRARY_PATH settings in AppImage environment initialization scripts to identify empty path components. For endpoints running affected Electron applications, enable detailed process execution logging and library loading audits. Check for unexpected library loads from the current working directory or the user's home directory tree. If you maintain a software repository or distribution platform, scan AppImage metadata and scripts for LD_LIBRARY_PATH configurations and flag those built with electron-updater versions prior to 26.15.0.
Why prioritize this
This vulnerability merits immediate attention because it affects the foundational update mechanism of Electron applications, threatening entire product lines. The local-access requirement and need for the attacker to place a file in a specific directory lower the severity compared to network-exploitable flaws, but the high exploitability in shared computing environments (development machines, CI/CD runners, shared workstations) and the difficulty of detection make it a solid priority. Applications that auto-update should be prioritized to ensure all users receive the fix quickly; those with manual update cycles need accelerated release planning.
Risk score, explained
The CVSS 3.1 score of 7.8 (HIGH) reflects the following: Attack Vector is Local (the attacker must have filesystem access), Attack Complexity is Low (no special conditions are needed beyond file placement), Privileges Required are Low (any local user or account that can write to the working directory), User Interaction is None (the vulnerability triggers on normal app launch), and impact is High across Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability (arbitrary code execution equals complete system compromise from the app's perspective). The score appropriately captures a serious but not critical vulnerability—it requires local access, which constrains the attack surface compared to remote exploits, but the ease of exploitation and severity of impact justify the HIGH classification.
Frequently asked questions
Does this affect Electron applications on Windows or macOS?
No. The vulnerability is specific to AppImage, a Linux application distribution format. The LD_LIBRARY_PATH environment variable and the attack method apply only to Linux systems. Windows and macOS Electron applications use different update and library-loading mechanisms and are not affected.
How can I tell if an Electron application I use is vulnerable?
Check if the application is distributed as a .AppImage file. If it is, and you downloaded it before the application vendor patched and rereleased it, assume it may be vulnerable. Look for security advisories from the vendor mentioning electron-updater updates. As a user, avoid extracting or running AppImage files from directories that contain untrusted files or that you share with other users on the same system.
What if our organization has already deployed vulnerable Electron applications internally?
Inventory all internal Electron applications, identify which use AppImage distribution, and determine which were built before the fix date (26.15.0 released around June 2026). Prioritize patched releases to affected endpoints. For applications that auto-update, the patch will roll out automatically if the new version is distributed. For manually updated applications, push an urgent release cycle. Educate users not to run AppImage files from shared or public directories.
Is there a way to safely run a vulnerable AppImage?
Run it from a directory that is not shared with other users and that you control entirely—such as a user-owned home directory subdirectory. Avoid running AppImage files from /tmp, shared network folders, or directories where untrusted users or processes can write files. However, this is a workaround, not a fix; patching is the correct remediation.
This analysis is based on the published CVE record and vendor advisory as of the modification date. No exploit code or weaponized proof-of-concept is provided. Organizations should verify all patch version numbers and applicability against their specific product versions and deployment environments. This page does not constitute legal or compliance advice. Consult your security team and vendor advisories for definitive remediation guidance tailored to your infrastructure. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-08-09. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).
Weaknesses (CWE)
Related vulnerabilities
- CVE-2026-10847HIGHCheck Point Identity Agent Privilege Escalation Vulnerability (7.8 CVSS)
- CVE-2026-36574HIGHCactusViewer DLL Hijacking Vulnerability (CVSS 7.8 HIGH)
- CVE-2026-38972HIGHNotepad3 DLL Search-Order Hijacking Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-41567HIGHMoby Container Privilege Escalation via Malicious Archive Decompression
- CVE-2026-44358HIGHEspressif DangerJS Action Code Execution in Pull Request Workflows
- CVE-2026-44609HIGHAcronis DeviceLock DLP Local Privilege Escalation via EXE Hijacking
- CVE-2026-44682HIGHAcronis DeviceLock DLP Local Privilege Escalation via DLL Hijacking
- CVE-2026-47937HIGHAdobe Acrobat Reader Uncontrolled Search Path Code Execution