CVE-2026-54469: Dell Unisphere PowerMax Arbitrary Command Execution (CVSS 8.8)
Dell Unisphere for PowerMax versions 10.3.0.5 and earlier contain a flaw that allows a low-privileged attacker with remote access to execute arbitrary commands as root. The vulnerability stems from unsafe handling of serialized data, meaning an attacker can craft malicious input that, when deserialized by the application, triggers code execution at the highest privilege level. This is a critical escalation path: an attacker who gains even basic user access can weaponize this flaw to take complete control of the storage management infrastructure.
Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain
- CVSS
- 3.1 · 8.8 HIGH · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
- Weaknesses (CWE)
- CWE-502
- Affected products
- 1 configuration(s)
- Published / Modified
- 2026-07-10 / 2026-07-16
NVD description (verbatim)
Dell Unisphere for PowerMax, version(s) 10.3.0.5 and prior, contain(s) a Deserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to arbitrary command execution with root privileges.
1 reference(s) · View on NVD →
SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source
Technical summary
The vulnerability is a deserialization flaw (CWE-502) in Unisphere for PowerMax. Unsafe deserialization occurs when untrusted data is reconstructed into object instances without proper validation. An authenticated remote attacker can supply specially crafted serialized payloads that instantiate malicious objects during deserialization, leading to arbitrary code execution. The low complexity vector and minimal attack prerequisites make this exploitable in practical scenarios. The flaw affects confidentiality, integrity, and availability—all critical security properties.
Business impact
Compromise of Unisphere for PowerMax translates to compromise of enterprise storage infrastructure. An attacker could modify storage configurations, steal sensitive data stored on managed arrays, disrupt operations, or deploy ransomware. Given that Unisphere is often central to multi-petabyte storage estates in large organizations, the business impact is severe: potential data loss, operational downtime, regulatory violations, and forensic complexity.
Affected systems
Dell Unisphere for PowerMax versions 10.3.0.5 and prior are vulnerable. Organizations should inventory their Unisphere deployments and identify instances running affected versions. Note that vulnerability exposure depends on network architecture—Unisphere instances exposed to untrusted networks carry greater risk than air-gapped or highly restricted deployments.
Exploitability
The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U) reflects that exploitation requires network access, valid user credentials, and no user interaction. The low attack complexity means no special conditions or techniques are needed beyond a properly crafted serialized payload. No public exploit code is known to be publicly available, but the straightforward nature of deserialization attacks means capable threat actors could develop exploits quickly. The barrier to exploitation is moderate but not high.
Remediation
Dell has released patched versions addressing this vulnerability. Organizations must apply updates to Unisphere for PowerMax as soon as feasible. Interim mitigations include restricting network access to Unisphere management interfaces, enforcing strong authentication, and implementing network segmentation to limit exposure. However, these controls are detective and preventive only—a patch is the definitive remediation.
Patch guidance
Upgrade Dell Unisphere for PowerMax to a version newer than 10.3.0.5. Consult Dell's security advisories and release notes to identify the specific patched version applicable to your environment. Test patches in a non-production environment first to ensure compatibility with your storage array configuration and dependent management tools. Dell typically publishes cumulative updates; verify your current version and apply the recommended update path.
Detection guidance
Monitor Unisphere for PowerMax for unusual deserialization activity, such as unexpected object instantiation or class loading from untrusted sources. Review authentication logs for suspicious login attempts or privilege escalation events originating from low-privileged accounts. Network-level detection should focus on traffic to Unisphere ports from unexpected sources. Endpoint detection and response (EDR) tools can help identify anomalous process execution with root-level privileges spawned by Unisphere services. Given the root-level execution, post-exploitation forensics may be challenging; focus on preventive and detective controls.
Why prioritize this
This vulnerability merits immediate attention due to the combination of high CVSS severity (8.8), low attack complexity, and the critical role of storage management infrastructure. An attacker can move from basic user access to full infrastructure control in a single exploitation step. Organizations managing large storage estates should prioritize this above lower-severity issues. The lack of known public exploits does not diminish urgency—capable adversaries will develop exploits, and storage infrastructure is a prime target for ransomware and data theft campaigns.
Risk score, explained
The CVSS 3.1 score of 8.8 (HIGH) reflects the severity of arbitrary command execution at root privilege following authentication. The network attack vector and low complexity amplify risk. While authentication is required (PR:L), many organizations maintain numerous Unisphere user accounts for operational and vendor personnel, increasing the likelihood that an attacker could obtain valid credentials or that an insider threat could exploit the flaw. The impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability is maximal, justifying the high score.
Frequently asked questions
Do we need to patch immediately if Unisphere is air-gapped?
Air-gapping reduces immediate risk significantly but does not eliminate it. Insider threats, supply chain compromises, or maintenance access by vendors could still introduce exploitation paths. Patching remains essential, though the timeline can be coordinated with change management windows. Do not assume air-gapping is permanent or foolproof.
Can network segmentation alone mitigate this vulnerability?
Network segmentation can reduce exposure by limiting who can reach Unisphere, but it is not a substitute for patching. An attacker who gains access to the segmented network—through credential theft, lateral movement, or VPN compromise—can still exploit the flaw. Treat segmentation as a preventive layer while prioritizing the patch.
What should we do if we cannot patch immediately?
Implement strict access controls on Unisphere: disable unnecessary accounts, enforce multi-factor authentication, restrict administrative access to named users, and monitor all authentication events. Reduce the attack surface by disabling unused services. Deploy network monitoring to detect exploitation attempts. Create an incident response plan. However, these measures buy time only; plan for patching within days, not weeks.
Is there a workaround that eliminates the vulnerability?
No known workaround eliminates unsafe deserialization without a patch. The flaw is intrinsic to how Unisphere processes serialized data. Workarounds and mitigations reduce risk but do not remove it. Patching is the only definitive remediation.
This analysis is provided for informational purposes to assist security leaders in vulnerability assessment and prioritization. It does not constitute professional security advice or replace consultation with vendor advisories, your internal security team, or external incident response experts. Patch versions, affected configurations, and remediation timelines must be verified against official Dell security bulletins and advisories. Testing in non-production environments is essential before deploying patches. Organizations should conduct their own risk assessments based on their specific infrastructure, threat landscape, and business criticality. SEC.co makes no warranty regarding the completeness or accuracy of this analysis and shall not be liable for decisions made in reliance upon it. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-08-17. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).
Related vulnerabilities
- CVE-2025-11993HIGHWooCommerce Infinite Scroll Plugin PHP Object Injection – HIGH Severity
- CVE-2025-27511HIGHGeoServer DB2 JNDI Injection Remote Code Execution
- CVE-2025-69130HIGHPHP Object Injection in Entrepreneur WordPress Booking Theme ≤3.1.3
- CVE-2025-71339HIGHPicklescan Gadget Bypass Allows Arbitrary Code Execution
- CVE-2025-71340HIGHPicklescan Evasion via idlelib.pyshell.ModifiedInterpreter
- CVE-2025-71341HIGHPicklescan Bypass Enables Remote Code Execution via profile.Profile.runctx
- CVE-2025-71342HIGHPicklescan Evasion Enables Remote Code Execution in PyTorch Models
- CVE-2025-71343HIGHpicklescan Detection Bypass Allows Remote Code Execution