CVE-2026-54280: AIOHTTP Resource Leak on Client Disconnect (3.14.1+)
AIOHTTP versions before 3.14.1 fail to properly release file handles and other system resources when a client disconnects during an active write operation. An attacker can exploit this by repeatedly initiating and aborting connections, causing the server to leak file descriptors and other limited resources. Over time, this degrades server performance and availability until the garbage collector intervenes or the process is restarted. The flaw is particularly dangerous in production environments handling high connection volumes.
Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain
- CVSS
- 3.1 · 7.5 HIGH · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
- Weaknesses (CWE)
- CWE-404
- Affected products
- 1 configuration(s)
- Published / Modified
- 2026-06-22 / 2026-06-26
NVD description (verbatim)
AIOHTTP is an asynchronous HTTP client/server framework for asyncio and Python. Prior to 3.14.1, payload resources are not closed correctly when a client disconnects in the middle of a write. If a payload is using an open file or similar limited resource, then an attacker may be able to cause resource starvation temporarily until garbage collection or similar closes the file. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.14.1.
2 reference(s) · View on NVD →
SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source
Technical summary
The vulnerability stems from improper resource cleanup in AIOHTTP's payload handling during aborted client connections. When a client disconnects mid-write, the framework does not invoke the necessary cleanup handlers for payload objects backed by file-like resources. This results in file descriptors remaining open in the process's file descriptor table. The issue is categorized as CWE-404 (Improper Resource Shutdown or Release), reflecting the core defect: resources are allocated but not returned to the operating system under abnormal connection termination paths. The fix in 3.14.1 ensures payload cleanup occurs regardless of connection state.
Business impact
Resource exhaustion vulnerabilities in application servers create operational risk without requiring authentication or special privileges. An attacker can trigger availability degradation by opening many connections and disconnecting during write phases, consuming file descriptors until the application cannot open new files, accept new connections, or log events. This is particularly damaging for internet-facing AIOHTTP deployments serving high request volumes. Depending on workload concurrency and system limits, an attacker may achieve effective denial of service with relatively modest effort.
Affected systems
AIOHTTP is a Python HTTP framework widely used in async web services, microservices, and API servers. The vulnerability affects all versions prior to 3.14.1. Organizations running production AIOHTTP applications should audit their current version and prioritize upgrades to 3.14.1 or later. This includes any custom Python web service, API gateway, or proxy built on AIOHTTP.
Exploitability
Exploitation requires only network access and the ability to initiate HTTP connections to an AIOHTTP service. No authentication, special headers, or payload content is needed—the attacker simply connects and abruptly terminates during the server's write phase. CVSS reflects this low complexity (AC:L) and lack of privileges (PR:N). The attack can be automated and scaled horizontally. However, the impact is availability-focused rather than confidentiality or integrity compromise, limiting the severity classification.
Remediation
Upgrade AIOHTTP to version 3.14.1 or later as soon as feasible. This is a straightforward dependency update for Python environments using pip or equivalent package managers. Organizations unable to upgrade immediately should implement connection rate limiting and monitor file descriptor usage (via lsof, ss, or /proc/self/fd on Linux) to detect resource leakage patterns. Consider deploying AIOHTTP behind a reverse proxy with connection timeout policies to reduce attacker-controlled connection duration.
Patch guidance
Verify your AIOHTTP installation with `pip show aiohttp` and confirm the version is 3.14.1 or later. Update using `pip install --upgrade aiohttp==3.14.1` or the latest stable release. If your project uses a requirements.txt or pyproject.toml, update the version constraint and reinstall dependencies. Test the upgrade in a non-production environment first to verify compatibility with your custom application code, particularly any custom event handlers or middleware. After patching, restart all running instances of the application.
Detection guidance
Monitor file descriptor counts on production servers: a rising fd_count for AIOHTTP processes without corresponding connection closures suggests resource leakage. Use `lsof -p <pid>` to enumerate open file descriptors and identify accumulating resources. Enable AIOHTTP debug logging to observe connection lifecycle events. Set up alerts for sustained increases in (CLOSE_WAIT or FIN_WAIT) socket states. Network-side detection is difficult since the attack uses standard HTTP; focus on operational metrics (fd count, memory, connection pool size) rather than traffic signatures.
Why prioritize this
Although the CVSS score is 7.5 (HIGH), practical impact depends on deployment context. Internet-facing AIOHTTP servers handling significant connection volume face elevated risk and should patch immediately. Internal or lightly-trafficked services have lower urgency but should still be prioritized within a standard patch cycle. The vulnerability is not yet in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, suggesting active exploitation is not widespread, but this should not delay patching.
Risk score, explained
The CVSS:3.1 score of 7.5 reflects an availability-only impact (A:H) with no confidentiality or integrity damage (C:N/I:N). Attack complexity is low (AC:L) and requires neither authentication (PR:N) nor user interaction (UI:N), making it straightforward to exploit at network scope (AV:N/S:U). The HIGH severity is justified by the ease of exploitation and potential service disruption, though not as critical as data breach scenarios.
Frequently asked questions
Do I need to update immediately, or can I defer this patch?
Patch within your standard security update cycle—ideally within 2–4 weeks—if your AIOHTTP service is internet-facing or handles untrusted traffic. Internal services can be deprioritized slightly, but resource exhaustion issues tend to worsen over time, so deferral beyond a month is not recommended. Validate the update in staging before production rollout.
Is there an immediate workaround if I cannot upgrade right now?
No complete workaround exists, but you can mitigate risk by enforcing strict connection timeouts (e.g., 10–30 seconds), implementing per-IP connection limits, and monitoring file descriptor usage. These reduce attacker effectiveness but do not eliminate the vulnerability. Upgrade as soon as operationally feasible.
Will upgrading AIOHTTP break my existing code?
Version 3.14.1 is a patch release and should be backward compatible. However, always test in a staging environment first, especially if you have custom request handlers or middleware. Review the changelog for any behavioral changes and validate that your integration tests pass before deploying to production.
How can I tell if my server has already been affected by this vulnerability?
Look for signs of resource leakage in production logs: rising memory usage, increasing file descriptor counts (check `lsof -p <pid>` or `/proc/<pid>/fd`), or application restarts due to resource limits. Correlate these with unexpected connection churn. If you see rapid disconnections without corresponding cleanup, the vulnerability is likely active.
This analysis is current as of the published CVE date and reflects information available from vendor advisories and public sources. Exploit status and active threat landscape may evolve; check CISA KEV and vendor security updates regularly. Organizations should validate patch compatibility in their specific environment before production deployment. This content is for informational purposes; consult your security team and vendor documentation for definitive guidance on your infrastructure. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-07-28. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).
Related vulnerabilities
- CVE-2026-10069HIGHShibby Tomato miniupnpd Resource Exhaustion Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-45174HIGHIdira Endpoint Privilege Manager Linux Agent Local Privilege Escalation
- CVE-2026-10113MEDIUMOpen5GS NF-Profile Parser Denial of Service Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-10115MEDIUMOpen5GS NF Profile Parser DoS Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-10116MEDIUMOpen5GS UE Authentication Denial-of-Service Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-10117MEDIUMOpen5GS nghttp2-server Denial of Service Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-10156MEDIUMOpen5GS Resource Exhaustion Vulnerability in nf-instances Endpoint
- CVE-2026-10190MEDIUMTenda W12 Web Interface Denial-of-Service Vulnerability