CVE-2026-53863: OpenClaw Input Validation Bypass Allows Unauthorized Tool Access
OpenClaw versions before 2026.4.25 have a flaw in how they validate group identifiers when making access control decisions for tool invocations. An attacker with basic authentication credentials can supply a crafted group ID that the system fails to properly validate, leading to incorrect policy enforcement. This could allow the attacker to invoke tools or perform actions they should not have permission to access, effectively bypassing the intended security controls that restrict who can use what tools.
Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain
- CVSS
- 3.1 · 7.1 HIGH · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
- Weaknesses (CWE)
- CWE-639
- Affected products
- 12 configuration(s)
- Published / Modified
- 2026-06-16 / 2026-06-17
NVD description (verbatim)
OpenClaw before 2026.4.25 contains an input validation vulnerability in tool group policy callers that accept unvalidated group IDs. Attackers who can supply a group ID to the policy resolver could trigger incorrect group-policy decisions for tool invocations, potentially bypassing intended access controls.
2 reference(s) · View on NVD →
SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source
Technical summary
CVE-2026-53863 is an input validation vulnerability affecting OpenClaw's tool group policy resolution mechanism. The vulnerability stems from insufficient validation of group ID parameters passed to policy callers. Attackers who can authenticate to the system (PR:L per CVSS vector) can supply malicious or unexpected group IDs that bypass the policy resolver's access control logic, resulting in privilege escalation or tool invocation outside intended authorization boundaries. The vulnerability is classified under CWE-639 (Authorization Through User-Controlled Key), indicating a design flaw where user-supplied data directly influences access decisions without proper verification.
Business impact
This vulnerability poses a significant risk to organizations relying on OpenClaw for tool access governance and authorization. An authenticated user could escalate their privileges by manipulating group identifiers, gaining unauthorized access to restricted tools or capabilities. The impact extends beyond individual user actions—compromised access controls could affect audit trails, compliance posture, and tool execution logs. Organizations using OpenClaw in security-sensitive workflows (deployment orchestration, system administration, or infrastructure automation) face elevated risk of unauthorized actions that may go undetected if group policy enforcement is a key security layer.
Affected systems
OpenClaw before version 2026.4.25 is affected. The vulnerability impacts all deployments of vulnerable OpenClaw versions where tool group policies are enforced through group ID resolution. Any system accepting tool invocation requests from authenticated users is potentially exploitable if those users can influence or inject group ID parameters into policy decisions.
Exploitability
The attack requires valid authentication credentials (PR:L), placing it within reach of insiders or users with compromised accounts. No user interaction is required (UI:N), and the vulnerability is easily reachable over the network (AV:N) with low attack complexity (AC:L), making it straightforward to exploit once an attacker is authenticated. The lack of complexity suggests the vulnerability does not require sophisticated exploitation techniques or race conditions. The CVSS score of 7.1 (HIGH) reflects the moderate barrier to entry (authentication required) combined with high integrity impact through unauthorized tool invocations.
Remediation
Upgrade OpenClaw to version 2026.4.25 or later, which contains fixes for group ID validation in the policy resolver. Organizations unable to upgrade immediately should review and strengthen authentication controls to limit who can access OpenClaw, and implement network segmentation to restrict access to the application. Consider enabling additional audit logging to detect suspicious group ID manipulations or unexpected tool invocations.
Patch guidance
Apply the update to OpenClaw 2026.4.25 or newer as soon as feasible. Verify the update is applied by checking the application version in your OpenClaw deployment. Test the patched version in a non-production environment first to ensure compatibility with your existing tool policies and configurations. After deployment, re-validate that tool group policies are enforced correctly and that users can only invoke tools matching their assigned groups.
Detection guidance
Monitor OpenClaw logs for policy resolution errors, particularly failed access attempts where the group ID does not match the authenticated user's assigned groups. Look for repeated attempts to invoke tools with mismatched or unexpected group identifiers. Network intrusion detection systems should flag requests with malformed or suspicious group ID parameters sent to the policy resolver endpoint. Compare user tool invocation logs against their assigned group memberships to identify unauthorized access patterns. If available, enable detailed policy decision logging to capture the group IDs being evaluated.
Why prioritize this
This vulnerability merits prompt attention because it directly undermines access control enforcement—a foundational security control. The combination of network accessibility, low attack complexity, and the ability to bypass authorization decisions with authenticated access makes it a practical risk. While the attack requires valid credentials, insider threats and credential compromise are common threats. Organizations should prioritize patching based on the sensitivity of tools protected by OpenClaw and the risk profile of their user base.
Risk score, explained
The CVSS 3.1 score of 7.1 (HIGH) reflects: network reachability (AV:N) and low attack complexity (AC:L) lower the barrier to exploitation; authentication requirement (PR:L) prevents unauthenticated attacks but is not an insurmountable barrier; no user interaction required (UI:N) means attacks can be automated; unchanged scope (S:U) indicates the vulnerability does not cross trust boundaries; low confidentiality impact (C:L) reflects potential information disclosure through unauthorized tool access; high integrity impact (I:H) is the primary concern, as tool invocation outside authorized groups can alter system state or behavior. The score appropriately prioritizes integrity over confidentiality, reflecting the nature of tool misuse as a primary threat.
Frequently asked questions
Does this vulnerability allow unauthenticated access?
No. The vulnerability requires valid authentication credentials to OpenClaw. However, once authenticated, an attacker can manipulate group IDs to access tools beyond their assigned permissions. This makes insider threats and compromised accounts significant attack vectors.
What is the difference between this vulnerability and a simple privilege escalation?
While the end result may appear similar, this is specifically an authorization bypass through input validation failure. The attacker's privilege level does not change, but their ability to invoke unauthorized tool groups does—the policy decision mechanism itself is bypassed rather than overridden through elevated credentials.
Do we need to reconfigure tool group policies after patching?
After upgrading to 2026.4.25, existing group policies should remain intact and function correctly. However, we recommend reviewing your group assignments and testing tool invocation access to ensure policies are enforced as intended post-update.
How can we detect if someone has exploited this vulnerability in our environment?
Review OpenClaw tool invocation logs for cases where a user successfully invoked a tool outside their assigned group, or where policy exceptions were granted. Compare the group ID in policy decisions against the user's actual group memberships. Correlate authentication timestamps with unexpected tool usage patterns.
This analysis is based on the published CVE description and CVSS vector provided. Organizations should verify patch availability and compatibility with their specific OpenClaw deployment before applying updates. Security decisions should incorporate your organization's risk tolerance, tool sensitivity, and user threat profile. For the most current patch status and detailed remediation steps, consult the official OpenClaw security advisories and vendor documentation. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-07-24. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).
Related vulnerabilities
- CVE-2025-14772HIGHABB T-MAC Plus Authorization Bypass (CVSS 8.8)
- CVE-2025-59133HIGHProjectopia Custom Role IDOR Vulnerability (7.5 CVSS)
- CVE-2026-12204HIGHShopXO Authorization Bypass in Order & Payment Processing
- CVE-2026-41084HIGHApache Airflow Task Instances API Authorization Bypass
- CVE-2026-42863HIGHFlowiseAI Mass Assignment Vulnerability in Chatflow Update Endpoint
- CVE-2026-42947HIGHNaxclow Device Takeover Vulnerability – Silent Unauthorized Reassignment
- CVE-2026-44692HIGHSharp Laravel Package Authenticated Path Traversal and Unauthorized File Disclosure
- CVE-2026-45281HIGHNextcloud Calendar Authorization Bypass – Patched in 32.0.9 and 33.0.3