CVE-2026-53822: OpenClaw Command Injection via Argument Manipulation
OpenClaw versions before 2026.5.18 contain a critical flaw that allows authenticated users to inject arbitrary shell commands by exploiting a timing gap between security approval and execution. An attacker with login credentials can craft malicious arguments that pass an initial security check, then modify them before the command runs—bypassing the allowlist protections meant to prevent unauthorized operations.
Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain
- CVSS
- 3.1 · 8.8 HIGH · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
- Weaknesses (CWE)
- CWE-367, CWE-77
- Affected products
- 1 configuration(s)
- Published / Modified
- 2026-06-12 / 2026-06-17
NVD description (verbatim)
OpenClaw before 2026.5.18 contains a command injection vulnerability where shell wrapper argv could change between approval and execution. Attackers can rebuild command arguments after allowlist approval to execute unapproved command shapes, potentially bypassing security controls.
2 reference(s) · View on NVD →
SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source
Technical summary
CVE-2026-53822 is a command injection vulnerability rooted in a Time-of-Check-Time-of-Use (TOCTOU) race condition in OpenClaw's shell wrapper argument handling. The vulnerability exists because the application validates command arguments against a security allowlist but does not maintain argument integrity between approval and execution. An authenticated attacker can reconstruct argv after the allowlist check passes, allowing execution of command shapes that would otherwise be blocked. The vulnerability is tracked under CWE-367 (Improper Restriction of Rendered UI Layers) and CWE-77 (Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command), reflecting both the timing and injection aspects of the flaw.
Business impact
This vulnerability poses significant risk to organizations relying on OpenClaw for privileged command execution control. The ability to bypass allowlist security controls enables attackers with valid credentials to execute unauthorized system commands with the privileges of the OpenClaw process. In environments where OpenClaw manages infrastructure automation, deployment pipelines, or system administration tasks, this could lead to unauthorized data access, system compromise, lateral movement, or service disruption. The requirement for prior authentication raises the bar slightly but does not eliminate risk, as insider threats, credential compromise, or lateral movement from other breached systems remain viable attack paths.
Affected systems
All versions of OpenClaw prior to 2026.5.18 are affected. Organizations should verify their OpenClaw deployment version immediately. The vendor is openclaw.
Exploitability
This vulnerability requires the attacker to possess valid credentials (CWE-367 reflects the authenticated requirement), but once authenticated, exploitation is straightforward: no special network conditions or user interaction are needed. The attack surface spans any network-accessible OpenClaw deployment, making it accessible to remote authenticated users. The TOCTOU nature of the flaw means the exploitation window may be narrow but deterministic, making it reliably exploitable in practice. The vulnerability is not listed in the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog as of the publication date, but the ease of exploitation and high impact suggest prompt patching is warranted.
Remediation
Upgrade OpenClaw to version 2026.5.18 or later immediately. This patch resolves the argument integrity issue by ensuring command arguments cannot be modified between allowlist approval and execution. Organizations unable to patch immediately should restrict network access to OpenClaw interfaces, limit authentication scope (e.g., use service accounts with minimal required privileges), and monitor command execution logs for anomalous argument patterns.
Patch guidance
Install OpenClaw version 2026.5.18 or any subsequent release. Verify compatibility with your current deployment configuration before applying patches in production. Test patched versions in a non-production environment first to ensure no regression in legitimate command workflows. Coordinate patching across all OpenClaw instances in your environment to eliminate attack surface uniformly.
Detection guidance
Monitor OpenClaw execution logs for command arguments that differ between approval events and execution events. Look for patterns where the same command identifier is approved with safe arguments but executed with potentially malicious ones. Network-level detection is difficult due to the nature of the flaw, but endpoint telemetry capturing process execution can reveal suspicious command-line arguments passed to OpenClaw-spawned child processes. Audit authentication logs for accounts accessing OpenClaw interfaces, especially any unusual or historical accounts, to identify potential compromise.
Why prioritize this
This vulnerability merits urgent patching due to its CVSS 3.1 score of 8.8 (HIGH severity), the requirement for only user-level privileges rather than administrative access, and the direct impact on security controls designed to prevent command injection attacks. The TOCTOU nature makes it reliably exploitable without exotic conditions. Although KEV inclusion is not yet confirmed, the combination of high impact (confidentiality, integrity, availability all affected), low complexity, and network accessibility justifies treating this as a critical security control bypass.
Risk score, explained
The CVSS 3.1 score of 8.8 reflects: Network accessibility (AV:N), Low Attack Complexity (AC:L), Low Privileges Required (PR:L), No User Interaction (UI:N), and impact across all three security properties—Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability. The score appropriately captures the severity of a command injection that bypasses security controls, though the authenticated requirement prevents a perfect 10. In practical terms, any compromise of user credentials or lateral movement into an authenticated session creates immediate risk of full system compromise via this flaw.
Frequently asked questions
Do we need active credentials to exploit this vulnerability?
Yes. The vulnerability requires valid OpenClaw authentication to trigger the argument reconstruction attack. This does not eliminate risk—compromised user accounts, insider threats, or lateral movement from other breached systems can provide the necessary credentials. Service-to-service authentication tokens are equally dangerous if accessible.
Can we detect if someone has exploited this against us?
Partial detection is possible through careful log analysis. Compare allowlist approval logs against actual command execution logs; mismatches in arguments for the same command identifier are suspicious. However, sophisticated attackers may cover logs, so this should be one layer of a comprehensive response plan, not the only detection mechanism.
Does the allowlist still protect us if we have not patched yet?
The allowlist provides partial protection against casual misuse but fails against this specific vulnerability. It does prevent the most obvious injections, but the TOCTOU flaw allows a determined attacker to bypass it entirely. Treat unpatchable systems as high-risk and isolate them from sensitive operations if possible.
What if we use OpenClaw only internally without network exposure?
Network accessibility reduces risk but does not eliminate it. Internal attackers, compromised internal systems, and supply chain compromises all pose realistic threats. Patch as soon as possible; isolation is a temporary mitigation only while you plan the upgrade.
This analysis is provided for informational purposes to help security teams understand and respond to CVE-2026-53822. It does not constitute a complete security audit or risk assessment for your specific environment. Organizations should verify all technical details, patch availability, and compatibility in their own testing environments before deploying patches to production. No exploit code is provided or intended. Always reference the official vendor advisory for the authoritative guidance on this vulnerability. SEC.co makes no warranty regarding the completeness, accuracy, or applicability of this analysis to your specific systems. Consult with your vendor, security team, and compliance advisors to determine the appropriate remediation timeline and prioritization for your environment. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-07-20. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).
Related vulnerabilities
- CVE-2026-53806HIGHOpenClaw Shell Option Parsing Bypass (CVSS 8.8)
- CVE-2026-53831HIGHOpenClaw Safe-Bin Allowlist Bypass Vulnerability (CVSS 8.3)
- CVE-2024-24909HIGHDell OpenManage Integration Remote Code Execution Vulnerability (CVSS 8.8)
- CVE-2024-52011HIGHCommand Injection in launch-editor via Malicious Filenames on Windows
- CVE-2025-56814HIGHOpenCPN Local Code Injection Vulnerability Analysis
- CVE-2025-64390HIGHPlayStation 4 BD-J Sandbox Escape Privilege Escalation (Firmware 13.00-13.02)
- CVE-2026-10214HIGHCommand Injection in chatgpt-on-wechat Bash Tool
- CVE-2026-10219HIGHGoClaw Command Injection Vulnerability