CVE-2026-53819: OpenClaw Arbitrary Code Execution in Skill Installation
OpenClaw versions before 2026.5.27 allow attackers to execute arbitrary code on systems during the skill installation process. The vulnerability exists because workspace configuration files (.env) can be manipulated to point to malicious Homebrew-compatible executables. An attacker who has access to a trusted operator workspace can exploit this during skill setup to run unintended commands with the privileges of the OpenClaw process, effectively taking control of the system.
Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain
- CVSS
- 3.1 · 8.8 HIGH · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
- Weaknesses (CWE)
- CWE-426
- Affected products
- 1 configuration(s)
- Published / Modified
- 2026-06-11 / 2026-06-17
NVD description (verbatim)
OpenClaw before 2026.5.27 contains an arbitrary code execution vulnerability in skill install flows where workspace .env files can override the Homebrew executable selection. Attackers with access to trusted operator workspaces can execute unintended Homebrew-compatible executables during skill setup to compromise the system.
2 reference(s) · View on NVD →
SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source
Technical summary
CVE-2026-53819 is an untrusted search path / arbitrary code execution flaw in OpenClaw's skill installation workflow. The vulnerability stems from improper validation of the Homebrew executable location specified in workspace .env files. When a skill is installed, the system resolves the Homebrew executable path using values from the .env configuration without sufficient integrity checks. An attacker positioned to modify or inject .env entries within a trusted operator workspace can redirect executable resolution to a malicious binary matching the Homebrew interface, achieving code execution in the context of the skill installation process. The flaw is classified under CWE-426 (Untrusted Search Path).
Business impact
Compromise of OpenClaw skill installation infrastructure could allow attackers to inject malware, steal credentials, or establish persistence within environments where OpenClaw orchestrates automation or DevOps workflows. Organizations relying on OpenClaw for infrastructure automation face direct risk of supply-chain style attacks via compromised skill packages or poisoned workspace configurations. The high CVSS score (8.8) reflects the ease of exploitation and the severity of potential impact—full confidentiality, integrity, and availability compromise of affected systems.
Affected systems
OpenClaw versions before 2026.5.27 are vulnerable. Any installation or deployment of OpenClaw that permits skill installation workflows in multi-user or shared workspace environments is at risk. Organizations should identify all OpenClaw instances in their infrastructure and check their installed version against the 2026.5.27 threshold. Particular attention should be paid to environments where workspace .env files are not strictly controlled or audited.
Exploitability
The vulnerability requires an attacker to have access to a trusted operator workspace, reducing the attack surface to insider or compromised-account scenarios. However, the CVSS vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H) indicates network accessibility with low attack complexity and user interaction required. An attacker who can convince an authorized operator to install a malicious skill package, or who has already gained workspace access through credential compromise, can exploit this with minimal additional effort. The lack of a KEV designation suggests it has not yet been publicly exploited at scale.
Remediation
Upgrade OpenClaw to version 2026.5.27 or later. This patch version includes validation improvements to the skill installation workflow and mitigates the .env override attack vector. Administrators should apply the patch immediately to all production and non-production OpenClaw instances. After patching, no additional configuration changes are required, though security teams should audit workspace .env files for any unauthorized modifications or suspicious executable paths that may have been injected prior to patching.
Patch guidance
1. Identify all OpenClaw deployments in your environment and verify their current version. 2. Obtain and review the 2026.5.27 release notes from the official OpenClaw repository or vendor channel to confirm vulnerability fixes. 3. Plan patching in a non-production environment first to validate compatibility with your skill packages and configurations. 4. Apply the patch to production systems during a maintenance window, prioritizing critical infrastructure automation systems. 5. After patching, verify that skill installation workflows complete successfully and no error logs indicate configuration issues. 6. Verify against the official vendor advisory for any post-patch configuration or environment variable guidance.
Detection guidance
Monitor OpenClaw logs for unusual .env file modifications within workspace directories, particularly changes to Homebrew-related executable paths (e.g., HOMEBREW_EXECUTABLE, or similar environment variable names your deployment uses). Audit skill installation activities, watching for child processes spawned with unexpected binary paths or commands. Implement file integrity monitoring on workspace .env files to detect unauthorized changes. Review access logs for workspace modification events by non-administrative accounts. If you suspect exploitation, check for unexpected files or binaries in workspace directories and analyze process execution history around skill installation timestamps.
Why prioritize this
This vulnerability should be prioritized highly because it enables unauthenticated code execution (with minimal user interaction) in environments where OpenClaw manages critical automation. The attack vector is practical for insiders or attackers with workspace access, and the confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact is total. Organizations with OpenClaw in security-sensitive roles (secrets management, infrastructure provisioning, CI/CD integration) should patch immediately. The absence of active public exploitation does not diminish urgency—this is a pre-exploitation window.
Risk score, explained
The CVSS 3.1 score of 8.8 (HIGH) reflects: (1) network-accessible attack vector allowing remote exploitation; (2) low attack complexity with no special conditions required; (3) user interaction required (a human must initiate skill installation, lowering PR/PR:N); (4) unchanged scope (no privilege boundary crossing); and (5) high impact across confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The score appropriately penalizes the privilege/access requirement (trusted workspace access) while rewarding the ease of code execution once that access is gained.
Frequently asked questions
Do I need to patch if my OpenClaw instance only runs pre-approved, vendor-supplied skills?
Yes. While the attack surface is reduced if you control skill sources tightly, the vulnerability exists at the installation layer itself. A compromised workspace configuration file or inadvertent modification could still be exploited. Patching removes the attack vector entirely and is the correct remediation approach.
What version of OpenClaw am I running, and how do I check?
Consult the OpenClaw documentation or admin interface for your deployment. Most OpenClaw installations display version information in their command-line help output (often `openclaw --version` or similar) or in web UI dashboards. Verify against the vendor advisory if you are unsure how to locate version information.
Are there any workarounds if I cannot patch immediately?
Implement strict file permissions and access controls on workspace .env files to prevent unauthorized modification. Monitor .env files with file integrity tools and alert on any changes. Limit skill installation to trusted administrator accounts only. These are not substitutes for patching but can reduce risk while you prepare a patch deployment.
Is this vulnerability being actively exploited?
As of the CVE publication date, this vulnerability has not been added to the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog, suggesting no known public exploitation at this time. However, organizations should not delay patching based on this—the vulnerability is easily exploitable by insiders or attackers with workspace access, and patching is the correct response.
This analysis is provided for informational purposes to assist security teams in vulnerability assessment and remediation planning. All information is derived from publicly available CVE data and vendor advisories. Patch version numbers and remediation steps should be verified against the official OpenClaw vendor security advisory before deployment. SEC.co does not provide exploit code or proof-of-concept demonstrations. Organizations should conduct their own risk assessment and testing in non-production environments before applying patches to production systems. No warranty is provided regarding the accuracy or completeness of this guidance for your specific environment. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-07-20. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).
Related vulnerabilities
- CVE-2026-53842HIGHOpenClaw Environment Variable Injection Leading to Arbitrary Code Execution
- CVE-2026-53846HIGHOpenClaw Path Traversal in npm_execpath Configuration
- CVE-2026-53858HIGHOpenClaw Environment Variable Injection and Code Execution Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-53865HIGHOpenClaw Path Traversal in Maintenance Tasks (7.1 HIGH)
- CVE-2026-11400HIGHAWS Advanced JDBC Wrapper Privilege Escalation in Aurora PostgreSQL
- CVE-2026-11401HIGHAurora PostgreSQL Privilege Escalation via Untrusted Search Path in AWS Advanced Go Wrapper
- CVE-2026-24064HIGHWaves Central macOS Privilege Escalation (CVSS 7.8)
- CVE-2026-47648HIGHWindows Storage Local Privilege Escalation Vulnerability