CVE-2026-53763: OP-TEE AES-GCM Integer Overflow – Authentication Tag Failure
OP-TEE, an open-source trusted execution environment for ARM processors, contains an integer overflow bug in its AES-GCM cryptographic implementation. When processing large amounts of encrypted data or authentication metadata—specifically over 512 megabytes—the flaw causes the authentication tag to be calculated incorrectly. This means encrypted messages could pass validation checks even if they were modified or corrupted in transit. The vulnerability affects all versions from 3.0.0 through 4.10.x; version 4.11.0 and later contain the fix.
Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain
- CVSS
- 3.0 · 3.8 LOW · CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
- Weaknesses (CWE)
- CWE-190
- Affected products
- 1 configuration(s)
- Published / Modified
- 2026-07-06 / 2026-07-07
NVD description (verbatim)
OP-TEE is a Trusted Execution Environment (TEE) designed as companion to a non-secure Linux kernel running on Arm; Cortex-A cores using the TrustZone technology. Starting in version 3.0.0 and prior to version 4.11.0, 32-bit integer overflows in OP-TEE core's AES-GCM implementation cause the authentication tag to be computed with incorrect bit-length values after processing more than 512 megabytes of payload or Additional Authenticated Data (AAD). Version 4.11.0 contains a patch. No known workarounds are available.
1 reference(s) · View on NVD →
SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source
Technical summary
The vulnerability arises from 32-bit integer overflows in OP-TEE core's AES-GCM authentication tag computation logic. AES-GCM (Galois/Counter Mode) is an authenticated encryption scheme that produces a cryptographic tag to verify both confidentiality and authenticity of data. The overflow occurs in bit-length calculations after processing cumulative payload or Additional Authenticated Data (AAD) exceeding 512 MB. Due to the integer overflow, the tag is computed against incorrect bit-length parameters, breaking the cryptographic guarantee that an unmodified ciphertext will always produce the same tag. This is a pure integrity failure; decryption of captured ciphertexts remains intractable without the key.
Business impact
The practical impact depends on deployment context. For systems using OP-TEE to protect sensitive operations (payment processing, DRM, biometric authentication), a weakened authentication tag could allow an attacker to craft forged encrypted messages that pass validation. This undermines the trust model of the TEE. However, impact is constrained: the attacker must have local access to interact with OP-TEE, and the overflow threshold of 512 MB is high for typical single-request payloads. Organizations relying on OP-TEE for cryptographic assurance should prioritize patching, but the risk is lower than for remote network-accessible TEE flaws.
Affected systems
OP-TEE versions 3.0.0 through 4.10.x are vulnerable. Version 4.11.0 and later are patched. The TEE runs on ARM Cortex-A processors with TrustZone support—common in mobile devices, IoT platforms, and enterprise ARM-based systems. Affected deployments include Android devices, automotive platforms, and edge computing appliances that bundle OP-TEE as their trusted execution layer. The source is Trusted Firmware (trustedfirmware op-tee).
Exploitability
Exploitability is limited by access and scale requirements. An attacker must have local access to the device and the ability to send crafted encrypted data to OP-TEE. They must also engineer a scenario where a single AES-GCM operation processes >512 MB of payload or AAD—a high bar for most real-world use cases. The CVSS score of 3.8 (LOW) reflects these constraints: Attack Vector is Local, and the integrity impact is isolated (only authentication fails, not confidentiality). No public exploits or KEV listing exist; this is not an actively exploited vulnerability.
Remediation
Upgrade OP-TEE to version 4.11.0 or later. Verify the upgrade path with your platform vendor (e.g., ARM, device manufacturer, or your secure boot integrator), as OP-TEE updates often require coordinated changes to bootloaders and kernel modules. No workarounds are available for earlier versions. If immediate patching is not possible, limit exposure by restricting which applications can invoke AES-GCM operations through OP-TEE's access control policies.
Patch guidance
Upgrade to OP-TEE version 4.11.0 or later. Obtain the patch from the Trusted Firmware project (trustedfirmware.org). Integration steps: (1) Download the patched source or binary for your ARM platform; (2) coordinate with your boot firmware and kernel maintainers to ensure compatibility; (3) rebuild secure boot images if required; (4) test cryptographic operations (especially those handling >100 MB payloads) before production deployment. Verify that your device's firmware release notes list this CVE fix.
Detection guidance
Detection is challenging because the flaw manifests as silent cryptographic failure rather than crashes or logs. Monitor for: (1) unexpected authentication tag mismatches in application logs; (2) unexplained validation errors in services using OP-TEE for AES-GCM; (3) version inventory of OP-TEE across your fleet—query secure firmware version APIs if available. Network-based detection is unlikely because communication with OP-TEE is local. Consider enabling debug logging in OP-TEE (if security policy permits) to track tag computation errors during testing.
Why prioritize this
Despite the LOW CVSS score, prioritize this patch in Q3 2026 if you operate devices running OP-TEE 3.0–4.10 in roles handling encrypted data. The flaw is in core crypto, and even though it requires local access and high-volume payloads, it directly compromises authentication integrity—a foundational TEE guarantee. Organizations with strict crypto compliance (FIPS, PCI-DSS, automotive functional safety) should treat it as medium priority. For general mobile and consumer deployments with routine OP-TEE usage, it is lower priority relative to other patches, but should be included in the next scheduled firmware update.
Risk score, explained
CVSS 3.8 (LOW) is justified: the vulnerability is local-only (no remote trigger), requires privilege (User scope broadens the attack surface, but still local), and causes integrity loss without affecting confidentiality or availability in the classical sense. The attack is technically feasible but operationally constrained by the 512 MB threshold and the need for local attack setup. The lack of public exploitation or KEV listing confirms it is not currently weaponized.
Frequently asked questions
What is OP-TEE and why should I care about it?
OP-TEE is an open-source Trusted Execution Environment that runs in a secured mode on ARM processors. It isolates sensitive operations (cryptography, biometrics, payments) from the main operating system. If you use Android devices, IoT appliances, or automotive systems, OP-TEE likely underpins their security. A flaw in OP-TEE's core crypto affects the trust guarantees of everything it protects.
Does this mean my encrypted data is now decryptable?
No. The flaw affects authentication tag validation, not encryption strength. An attacker cannot decrypt your data without the key. However, they could craft a forged ciphertext that incorrectly passes authentication checks—fooling the application into accepting modified or fake data.
I have devices running OP-TEE 3.5. How urgent is this patch?
Upgrade within your next scheduled firmware update cycle, prioritizing devices handling large encrypted payloads (video, database, archives). If your devices only encrypt small messages (<100 MB per operation), the practical risk is lower, but patching is still recommended for long-term security assurance.
Can I detect if an attacker exploited this on my device?
Detection is difficult without direct access to OP-TEE's internal logs, which are often restricted. Look for unexpected cryptographic validation errors in application logs, repeated authentication failures, or unexplained data integrity issues. Version scans of your firmware will confirm if you're running a vulnerable OP-TEE build.
This analysis is based on publicly available CVE data and vendor advisories current as of July 2026. Patch version numbers and compatibility details should be verified against the official Trusted Firmware security advisory and your device manufacturer's release notes before deployment. No exploit code or weaponized proof-of-concept is provided. Organizations should conduct their own risk assessment based on their specific OP-TEE deployment architecture and data sensitivity. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-08-15. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).
Related vulnerabilities
- CVE-2026-10268LOWJanet Language Integer Overflow in Fiber Deserialization
- CVE-2026-10722LOWInteger Overflow in Cilium eBPF BTF Loading – Patch Guidance
- CVE-2026-14758LOWradare2 Integer Overflow in Hexpairs Parser (Local DoS)
- CVE-2026-14761LOWInteger Overflow in radare2 String Functions – Patch & Remediation
- CVE-2026-14786LOWInteger Overflow in Radare2 String Handling (Local DoS)
- CVE-2026-14787LOWRadare2 Integer Overflow in Print Command Handler
- CVE-2026-56363LOWImageMagick Division by Zero Denial of Service
- CVE-2023-29146HIGHInteger Overflow in Malwarebytes EDR 1.0.11 Linux Hash Functions