CVE-2026-53736: Easy Twitter Feeds CSRF Vulnerability in Post Duplication
Easy Twitter Feeds versions before 1.2.13 have a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in their post duplication feature. An attacker can craft a malicious link that, when clicked by a logged-in user, will automatically duplicate posts without the user's knowledge or consent. The vulnerability exists because the plugin fails to validate that duplication requests actually came from the user, making it trivial for attackers to abuse the feature via social engineering or injected links.
Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain
- CVSS
- 3.1 · 4.3 MEDIUM · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
- Weaknesses (CWE)
- CWE-352
- Affected products
- 0 configuration(s)
- Published / Modified
- 2026-06-10 / 2026-06-17
NVD description (verbatim)
Easy Twitter Feeds before 1.2.13 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in the duplicate_post action handler that lacks nonce verification. Attackers can trick an authenticated user into visiting a crafted link that duplicates any post regardless of post type.
2 reference(s) · View on NVD →
SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source
Technical summary
The vulnerability is a classic CSRF flaw (CWE-352) in the duplicate_post action handler lacking nonce verification. When an authenticated WordPress user visits a crafted URL, the plugin processes the duplication request without confirming it originated from a legitimate user action on the plugin's own interface. An attacker can exploit this by embedding the malicious URL in an email, forum post, or website, causing automatic post duplication when visited by any authenticated user. The CVSS 3.1 score of 4.3 reflects low impact—integrity is compromised through unwanted post creation, but confidentiality and availability are not directly affected.
Business impact
For site owners running Easy Twitter Feeds, this vulnerability enables attackers to spam or flood a WordPress site with duplicate posts without user authorization. This can degrade site performance, pollute content streams, and create confusion among users and administrators. In multi-author environments, an attacker could exploit any editor or admin, potentially generating large volumes of unwanted duplicates that require manual cleanup. While the direct damage is contained to post duplication, repeated exploitation could be used as a vector for broader disruption or to generate spam content that affects SEO and user trust.
Affected systems
Easy Twitter Feeds plugin versions prior to 1.2.13 are vulnerable. The plugin runs on WordPress sites, so any WordPress installation using an affected version of Easy Twitter Feeds is at risk. Sites where multiple users have post creation or editing capabilities face heightened risk because attackers have more targets to exploit. The vulnerability does not affect WordPress core or other plugins directly—only sites with Easy Twitter Feeds installed are impacted.
Exploitability
Exploitation requires minimal effort and no special tools. An attacker simply crafts a URL containing the duplicate_post action and shares it—either via phishing, forum injection, or embedding on a website an authenticated user visits. The lack of nonce verification means every click by a logged-in user results in successful exploitation. The CVSS vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R) confirms network accessibility, low attack complexity, and only user interaction (clicking a link) as a requirement. This is a practical, low-barrier attack with immediate effects.
Remediation
Update Easy Twitter Feeds to version 1.2.13 or later. This patch version introduces proper nonce verification in the duplicate_post action handler, ensuring only legitimate user-initiated requests are processed. Site administrators should immediately audit their WordPress plugin versions and apply the update to all affected installations. No additional configuration changes are required post-patch.
Patch guidance
Administrators should prioritize updating Easy Twitter Feeds to 1.2.13 or later as soon as possible. Since this is a medium-severity CSRF vulnerability with proven exploitability and user interaction as the only barrier, patching should be completed within one to two weeks if possible. To patch: log in to WordPress, navigate to Plugins, locate Easy Twitter Feeds, and select the Update option if available. Alternatively, download version 1.2.13 from the official WordPress plugin repository and upload it manually. Verify the plugin version in the Plugins list post-update to confirm successful installation. Test post duplication functionality after patching to ensure normal operation is restored.
Detection guidance
Monitor for suspicious duplication patterns: multiple identical posts created in rapid succession, especially during off-hours or by accounts not typically creating content. Review post revision and audit logs if available to identify unauthorized post creation events. If Easy Twitter Feeds logs requests, inspect the duplicate_post action logs for requests without valid nonce parameters or from unexpected referrers. In WordPress, check the admin's post edit screen for unexpected post duplicates and trace their creation time and author. If you suspect exploitation, compare the timestamp of duplicates against user login records to identify if posts were created while that user was not actively logged in.
Why prioritize this
Although the CVSS score is 4.3 (MEDIUM), this vulnerability warrants prompt attention because: (1) exploitation is trivial—no authentication bypass or complex payload required, (2) the attack surface is large on multi-author WordPress sites, (3) the fix is straightforward and available, and (4) post duplication can cascade into secondary problems like resource exhaustion or compliance issues if exploited at scale. It should not be treated as a critical emergency, but should be included in the next regular patch cycle with elevated priority over non-CSRF vulnerabilities of similar severity.
Risk score, explained
The CVSS 3.1 score of 4.3 (MEDIUM) reflects limited direct impact—only integrity of posts is affected; confidentiality and availability are not compromised. However, the score does not fully capture the social engineering and operational friction components. The scoring vector (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N) correctly identifies that the vulnerability requires user interaction and results in localized integrity loss without scope expansion. Organizations relying heavily on post authenticity or facing strict content governance may perceive this as higher risk than the base score suggests.
Frequently asked questions
Can an attacker duplicate posts without the user clicking a link?
No. The attack requires user interaction—the user must click a malicious link or visit a page containing the link. This is reflected in the CVSS vector (UI:R). An attacker cannot trigger duplication through passive means like reading an email or viewing a webpage that doesn't contain an embedded attack link.
What post types can be duplicated via this vulnerability?
According to the vulnerability description, any post type can be duplicated regardless of its classification. This means blog posts, pages, custom post types, and any content stored in the Easy Twitter Feeds system can be targeted.
Is there a workaround if we cannot patch immediately?
The most practical interim mitigation is to restrict user roles—disable post creation or editing permissions for less-trusted users until the patch is applied. However, this is disruptive and temporary. The real solution is to apply version 1.2.13 as quickly as possible. There is no configuration setting within Easy Twitter Feeds that disables the vulnerability.
If we are compromised, what should we happen?
Review the post creation log for unexpected duplicates created around suspicious timestamps. Audit the user accounts that appear in the creation records and reset their passwords if you cannot confirm they authorized those actions. If large-scale duplication occurred, you may need to bulk delete the duplicate posts using a bulk action tool or database cleanup. Document the timeline for your incident response records.
This analysis is based on the vulnerability disclosure for CVE-2026-53736. Always verify patch version numbers and affected product versions directly against the official Easy Twitter Feeds plugin repository and vendor advisory before applying patches. Security impact may vary depending on your specific WordPress configuration, user roles, and content governance policies. Consult with your security team before implementing changes in production environments. This page does not constitute a substitute for professional security advice. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-07-20. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).
Weaknesses (CWE)
Related vulnerabilities
- CVE-2016-20067MEDIUMWordPress CP Polls CSRF Vulnerability
- CVE-2016-20074MEDIUMWordPress Lazy Content Slider CSRF Vulnerability – Patch & Detection Guide
- CVE-2016-20083MEDIUMWordPress More Fields Plugin CSRF Vulnerability – Exploitation, Remediation & Detection
- CVE-2018-25387MEDIUMHaPe PKH 1.1 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) Admin Password Reset
- CVE-2018-25397MEDIUMCSRF Vulnerability in PHP-SHOP 1.0 – Admin Account Injection
- CVE-2018-25435MEDIUMZeusCart 4.0 CSRF Vulnerability – Account Deactivation Risk
- CVE-2022-44630MEDIUMYITH WooCommerce Product Slider Carousel CSRF Vulnerability
- CVE-2022-47150MEDIUMCSRF Vulnerability in WooCommerce Conversion Tracking Plugin – Patch Guidance