CVE-2026-53521: Nezha Monitoring DDNS Profile Context Confusion (CVSS 6.4)
Nezha Monitoring, a lightweight self-hosted server monitoring tool, contains a flaw in versions 2.0.14 through 2.0.x that allows attackers to hijack DDNS (Dynamic DNS) profile updates. An authenticated user can save references to nonexistent DDNS profiles on their server. Later, if another user creates a DDNS profile matching one of those IDs, the monitoring system will incorrectly use the new user's DDNS configuration to push updates to the attacker's infrastructure. This creates a cross-user context confusion where DDNS changes intended for one user leak into another user's server configuration. The issue is resolved in version 2.1.0.
Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain
- CVSS
- 3.1 · 6.4 MEDIUM · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:L
- Weaknesses (CWE)
- CWE-863
- Affected products
- 0 configuration(s)
- Published / Modified
- 2026-06-12 / 2026-06-17
NVD description (verbatim)
Nezha Monitoring is a self-hostable, lightweight, servers and websites monitoring and O&M tool. From version 2.0.14 to before version 2.1.0, PATCH /server/{id} accepts and persists nonexistent ddns_profiles IDs for a member-owned server. If another user later creates a DDNS profile with one of those IDs, the DDNS worker resolves the stored ID and dispatches an update using the other user's DDNS profile configuration in the context of the attacker's server. This issue has been patched in version 2.1.0.
2 reference(s) · View on NVD →
SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source
Technical summary
The vulnerability stems from insufficient validation and access control on the PATCH /server/{id} endpoint. The application accepts ddns_profiles IDs without verifying they exist or belong to the authenticated user at time of assignment. When the DDNS worker processes a server update, it resolves stored profile IDs by lookup rather than by owner, causing it to load and apply an arbitrary user's DDNS configuration in the wrong context. This is an example of insecure direct object reference (IDOR) combined with inadequate authorization checks. The flaw affects the horizontal privilege boundary between users in a multi-tenant or multi-user deployment. An authenticated attacker with member-level privileges can trigger the misconfiguration; the actual DDNS update happens asynchronously when a victim user creates a profile with a colliding ID.
Business impact
In organizations using Nezha for infrastructure monitoring, this vulnerability allows a compromised or malicious user account to subtly corrupt or redirect DDNS updates across other users' monitored servers. This could lead to DNS cache poisoning effects, redirection of traffic, or masking of infrastructure changes. The impact is amplified in environments where DDNS profiles are tied to critical failover or load-balancing logic. Affected organizations may experience undetected configuration drift, service disruptions if DDNS updates point to wrong endpoints, or loss of visibility into which user changed what. The multi-tenant or multi-user nature of self-hosted deployments makes this particularly risky for managed service providers or shared corporate monitoring infrastructure.
Affected systems
Nezha Monitoring versions 2.0.14 through 2.0.x are affected. Version 2.1.0 and later contain the fix. Any deployment running a vulnerable version in a multi-user environment is at risk; single-user or isolated deployments have lower practical exposure since the attack requires two separate user accounts. Self-hosted instances on any operating system (Linux, Windows, macOS) running the vulnerable version are equally susceptible.
Exploitability
Exploitation requires valid authentication (member-level credentials or higher). No special network positioning or user interaction is needed once an attacker has account access. An attacker can immediately save a malicious profile reference; exploitation completes when another user later creates a matching DDNS profile. The attack is not visible in real-time logs unless operators specifically audit profile assignments and ownership. The barrier to entry is moderate—the attacker needs legitimate credentials—but the mechanics are straightforward and repeatable.
Remediation
Upgrade to Nezha Monitoring version 2.1.0 or later. Organizations unable to upgrade immediately should restrict DDNS profile creation to trusted administrators and implement strict audit logging on all PATCH /server/{id} requests and DDNS profile lifecycle events. Additionally, review existing DDNS profile assignments to identify orphaned or cross-user references that may indicate prior exploitation. Limit member-level account creation and enforce role-based access control to minimize the number of users who can modify server configurations.
Patch guidance
Apply the upgrade to version 2.1.0 as soon as testing permits. Verify the patch by confirming the version number in the application settings or via the API. Test DDNS profile assignment and update workflows in a staging environment before production deployment to ensure the fix does not break existing integrations. Consult the official Nezha project release notes on GitHub for any migration guidance or breaking changes between 2.0.x and 2.1.0.
Detection guidance
Monitor PATCH /server/{id} API logs for ddns_profiles assignments, particularly those that reference profile IDs that do not exist in the database at time of request. Cross-reference profile ownership with the authenticated user making the request. Flag any instance where a server is assigned a DDNS profile owned by a different user. Audit logs should also capture the creation of new DDNS profiles and correlate timing with prior malicious assignments. Network-level detection is limited; focus on application and configuration auditing.
Why prioritize this
This is a medium-severity vulnerability (CVSS 6.4) driven by the multi-user context confusion and the potential for infrastructure misconfiguration. While it requires authentication and does not directly leak confidential data, the integrity impact (modification of DDNS routing) and availability impact (service disruption if DDNS points to wrong target) make it a solid mid-tier priority. Organizations with multi-user or managed Nezha deployments should prioritize patching within their normal 2–4 week cycle. Single-user deployments can defer if necessary, but should not be exempted from planning.
Risk score, explained
CVSS 6.4 reflects a network-accessible vulnerability with low complexity (straightforward API call), requiring low-privilege authentication, no user interaction, and a scope change (cross-user impact). Confidentiality is not impacted (no data disclosure); integrity and availability are both degraded (misconfigured DDNS and potential service disruption). The 'Low' complexity and 'Low' privilege requirement elevate the score; the lack of critical confidentiality impact and the required authentication gate it from higher tiers.
Frequently asked questions
Can a single-user Nezha instance be exploited?
No. The vulnerability requires two separate user accounts—one to set the malicious reference and another to create the colliding DDNS profile. Single-user deployments have no second user and are therefore not exploitable, though they should still be patched to maintain hygiene and prepare for future multi-user expansion.
Does this vulnerability expose DDNS credentials or secrets?
No. The vulnerability does not leak the contents of DDNS profiles or credentials. Instead, it causes one user's DDNS configuration to be applied in the wrong context (another user's server). Confidentiality is not breached; the concern is integrity and availability.
How can I detect if my instance has been exploited?
Look for DDNS profile assignments on servers owned by users who did not create those profiles. Check PATCH /server/{id} audit logs for orphaned profile ID references (IDs that existed when saved but no longer exist in the database, or IDs owned by a different user). A forensic review of DDNS update logs may show unexpected DNS changes tied to profiles the server owner did not authorize.
Is upgrading to 2.1.0 safe, or are there breaking changes?
Verify against the official Nezha release notes and changelog for version 2.1.0. While the patch addresses a critical security flaw, always test upgrades in a staging environment first to confirm compatibility with your specific configuration and integrations.
This analysis is provided for informational purposes and represents a snapshot of available information as of the publication date. SEC.co does not warrant the completeness or accuracy of third-party vendor advisories or patch release notes. Organizations should verify all patch versions, compatibility statements, and remediation steps against official vendor documentation and conduct independent testing before deploying changes to production systems. This vulnerability analysis does not constitute professional security advice; engage qualified security personnel for your specific environment. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-07-20. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).
Weaknesses (CWE)
Related vulnerabilities
- CVE-2026-10211MEDIUMAstrBot 4.23.6 Path Normalization Authorization Bypass
- CVE-2026-10616MEDIUMAuthorization Bypass in nextlevelbuilder GoClaw Task Completion
- CVE-2026-10815MEDIUMAuthorization Bypass in Hostel Management System PHP
- CVE-2026-10860MEDIUMMISP Delete Validation Bypass – Logic Error in HTTP DELETE Handler
- CVE-2026-21036MEDIUMSamsung Internet Authorization Flaw Exposes Sensitive Data
- CVE-2026-2470MEDIUMPagelayer WordPress Plugin Authorization Bypass in Contact Form Templates
- CVE-2026-32906MEDIUMOpenClaw Privilege Escalation in Slack Plugin Approvals
- CVE-2026-34507MEDIUMOpenClaw QQBot Admin Command Policy Bypass (CVSS 5.4)