CVE-2026-53467: ImageMagick MNG Decoder Heap Information Disclosure
ImageMagick, a widely-used image editing and manipulation tool, contains a vulnerability in its MNG (Multiple-image Network Graphics) decoder that can leak sensitive memory contents. When processing certain MNG files, part of the image pixel data is not properly initialized, potentially exposing unintended information from the heap memory. An attacker can craft a malicious MNG file that, when processed by a vulnerable ImageMagick instance, causes the application to return heap data as part of the image output. This affects ImageMagick versions prior to 6.9.13-51 (legacy branch) and 7.1.2-26 (current branch).
Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain
- CVSS
- 3.1 · 5.3 MEDIUM · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
- Weaknesses (CWE)
- CWE-200, CWE-908
- Affected products
- 1 configuration(s)
- Published / Modified
- 2026-07-01 / 2026-07-02
NVD description (verbatim)
ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to versions 6.9.13-51 and 7.1.2-26, the MNG decoder contains a possible heap information disclosure vulnerability because part of the pixels are left unchanged. This issue has been fixed in versions 6.9.13-51 and 7.1.2-26.
1 reference(s) · View on NVD →
SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source
Technical summary
The vulnerability stems from incomplete pixel initialization in the MNG decoder routine. MNG is a PNG-like format that supports animation and multiple images. During the decoding process, the implementation allocates heap memory for pixel buffers but fails to zero or properly initialize all allocated regions before use. When the decoder processes certain MNG structures, uninitialized heap data remains in the buffer and is incorporated into the output image. This creates an information disclosure path where adjacent heap allocations—potentially containing sensitive data—become visible to an attacker who can control the MNG input. The issue is classified under CWE-200 (Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor) and CWE-908 (Use of Uninitialized Resource). Exploitation does not require authentication and can occur over a network if ImageMagick is exposed via a web service.
Business impact
For organizations using ImageMagick in automated image processing pipelines—such as web applications that accept user uploads, thumbnail generation services, or API-based image conversion tools—this vulnerability poses a moderate but real risk. A successful exploit could leak sensitive heap memory, potentially including database credentials, session tokens, cryptographic keys, or other in-memory secrets if they happen to reside in adjacent allocations. While the exposure is limited by heap layout randomization and the need to craft specific MNG inputs, the risk is elevated if ImageMagick processes untrusted image sources. Organizations in regulated industries (finance, healthcare, government) should treat this as a priority because even limited information disclosure can violate compliance requirements.
Affected systems
ImageMagick versions prior to 6.9.13-51 (the legacy 6.9.x branch) and 7.1.2-26 (the current 7.x branch) are affected. Any system running an unpatched version of ImageMagick that processes MNG files—whether through direct command-line use, library integration, or exposure via a web or API service—is vulnerable. This includes Docker containers, cloud functions, content delivery systems, and embedded deployments. Organizations should audit all instances where ImageMagick is installed or bundled, including in third-party software or container images.
Exploitability
Exploitation requires network access to the ImageMagick service and the ability to supply a specially crafted MNG file as input. No authentication is needed, and no user interaction is required beyond processing the malicious file. The attack complexity is low: an attacker simply sends a crafted MNG to trigger the decoder. However, the practical impact is mitigated by several factors: the attacker cannot control which heap data is exposed (it depends on runtime allocation patterns), Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) and heap randomization reduce predictability, and the leaked data is embedded in image output, requiring the attacker to retrieve and parse the result. Despite these constraints, the vulnerability is straightforward to trigger and warrants prompt patching, especially in internet-facing or untrusted-input scenarios.
Remediation
Upgrade ImageMagick to version 6.9.13-51 or later for the legacy branch, or to version 7.1.2-26 or later for the current branch. These versions include fixes that ensure proper initialization of heap memory in the MNG decoder. If immediate patching is not feasible, consider disabling MNG format support in ImageMagick configuration, implementing strict input validation to reject MNG files, or restricting ImageMagick to trusted image sources only. For web applications, isolate ImageMagick processing in a sandboxed environment and limit what an attacker can do with leaked memory.
Patch guidance
Verify the specific version of ImageMagick in your environment using `convert -version` (or `magick -version` for ImageMagick 7). If you are running 6.9.13-50 or earlier, or 7.1.2-25 or earlier, apply the update immediately. Consult your distribution's package manager (apt, yum, brew) for availability of patched versions, or download directly from the ImageMagick official repository. Test the patched version in a staging environment to ensure compatibility with your image processing workflows before rolling out to production. Container users should rebuild or pull updated base images with the patched ImageMagick version.
Detection guidance
Monitor system logs for ImageMagick crashes or unexpected behavior when processing MNG files. Implement application logging to record all image file uploads and their formats; flag MNG files for review if they are unexpected in your workflow. If you run ImageMagick in a service, monitor for unusual heap memory access patterns or error messages from the MNG decoder. Network-level detection is difficult because the attack is silent and embedded in normal file processing; however, if you can inspect file uploads, reject or quarantine MNG files until you patch. Consider using static analysis on any custom ImageMagick scripts to identify MNG processing paths.
Why prioritize this
Although the CVSS score of 5.3 (MEDIUM) reflects limited scope and no impact on availability or integrity, the ease of exploitation (network-accessible, no auth required, low complexity) and the nature of the exposure (heap memory leaks from a widely-trusted tool) warrant prioritization. ImageMagick is frequently integrated into web services, build pipelines, and cloud functions, expanding the potential impact. The lack of exploitation complexity and the prevalence of ImageMagick in production environments justify treating this as a near-term patch target, especially if your organization processes untrusted or user-supplied images.
Risk score, explained
The CVSS 3.1 score of 5.3 reflects a network-accessible vulnerability with low attack complexity, no privileges required, and no user interaction needed—all favoring the attacker. However, the impact is limited to confidentiality (L) with no impact on integrity or availability. The attack vector is broad (network-based), but the scope is unchanged (the attacker can only extract data from the vulnerable process itself). The score appropriately captures moderate risk: not as severe as critical or high-impact flaws, but definitely meriting prompt remediation given the prevalence of ImageMagick and the simplicity of triggering the flaw.
Frequently asked questions
Is this vulnerability actively exploited in the wild?
This vulnerability is not listed in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog, which means there is no confirmed evidence of active exploitation at this time. However, the simplicity of the attack (crafting a malicious MNG file) and the widespread use of ImageMagick mean exploitation could accelerate once public details emerge. Patch proactively rather than waiting for proof-of-concept code to circulate.
Can this vulnerability steal my database passwords or API keys?
It is theoretically possible if those secrets are temporarily stored in heap memory near the MNG decoder's buffer. However, the attacker cannot directly control what data is leaked; it depends on heap layout and timing. Secrets stored in secure memory, environment variables set at process start, or external credential systems are less likely to be exposed. That said, treat any heap leak as a potential risk and follow defense-in-depth practices (rotating credentials, using short-lived tokens, etc.).
Do I need to worry about this if I only process PNG or JPEG files?
If your ImageMagick deployment is strictly limited to PNG or JPEG and MNG is disabled or never encountered, your exposure is minimal. However, if users can upload any image format or if your configuration does not explicitly restrict formats, an attacker could supply an MNG file to exploit this. Review your input validation and file-type restrictions to be sure.
What is the difference between the 6.9.13-51 and 7.1.2-26 patch versions?
ImageMagick maintains two release branches: the legacy 6.9.x and the current 7.x. The patched versions are 6.9.13-51 for the older branch and 7.1.2-26 for the newer branch. Most new deployments should use the 7.x branch, but some legacy systems may still depend on 6.9.x. Check which branch your organization uses and upgrade to the appropriate patched version.
This analysis is provided for informational purposes and reflects information available as of the publication date. SEC.co does not provide legal or compliance advice. Organizations must verify patch availability and compatibility with their specific environments before deploying updates. The vulnerability details, affected versions, and remediation steps are based on official vendor disclosures and security databases. Always consult the official ImageMagick security advisory and your vendor documentation for authoritative guidance. Risk assessments should be tailored to your specific infrastructure, threat model, and business context. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-08-10. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).
Related vulnerabilities
- CVE-2026-47165MEDIUMImageMagick Distributed Pixel Cache Authentication Bypass
- CVE-2026-49219MEDIUMImageMagick Policy Bypass via Symlink Path Traversal
- CVE-2026-10254MEDIUMUnauthenticated Information Disclosure in SourceCodester Pet Grooming Software
- CVE-2026-10854MEDIUMMISP Galaxy Visibility Control Bypass – Unauthorized Private Metadata Access
- CVE-2026-10864MEDIUMMISP Dashboard Widget Field Filtering Bypass (Medium)
- CVE-2026-11089MEDIUMGoogle Chrome Memory Disclosure in Media Handling
- CVE-2026-11162MEDIUMChrome CSS Cross-Origin Data Leak Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-11168MEDIUMChrome Extension Memory Disclosure Vulnerability