CVE-2026-53462: ImageMagick Heap-Use-After-Free Denial of Service
ImageMagick, a widely-used open-source tool for image manipulation, contains a memory safety flaw that can crash applications processing certain malformed images. When the software attempts to allocate memory during image validation and that allocation fails, it may continue to use memory that has already been freed, leading to a denial of service. The issue affects ImageMagick versions prior to 6.9.13-50 (legacy branch) and 7.1.2-25 (current branch).
Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain
- CVSS
- 3.1 · 5.9 MEDIUM · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
- Weaknesses (CWE)
- CWE-416
- Affected products
- 1 configuration(s)
- Published / Modified
- 2026-06-10 / 2026-06-17
NVD description (verbatim)
ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to versions 6.9.13-50 and 7.1.2-25, when an allocation fails in CheckPrimitiveExtent this can result in a heap-use-after-free and result in a crash. This issue has been patched in versions 6.9.13-50 and 7.1.2-25.
1 reference(s) · View on NVD →
SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source
Technical summary
CVE-2026-53462 is a heap-use-after-free vulnerability (CWE-416) in ImageMagick's CheckPrimitiveExtent function. The flaw occurs when memory allocation fails during primitive extent checking, but the code does not properly handle the allocation failure before attempting to dereference the failed pointer. This results in use-after-free behavior that typically manifests as a process crash. The vulnerability requires network accessibility to an ImageMagick instance processing untrusted image input, though exploitation depends on specific memory layout conditions (reflected in the CVSS vector's AC:H rating).
Business impact
Availability disruption is the primary business impact. Services relying on ImageMagick for image processing—such as web applications, content management systems, or image conversion pipelines—are vulnerable to denial of service attacks. An attacker sending crafted image files could crash backend processes, interrupting service to legitimate users. Organizations operating ImageMagick in customer-facing or batch-processing contexts should assess exposure. The MEDIUM severity rating reflects that confidentiality and integrity are not at risk, but availability impact is confirmed.
Affected systems
ImageMagick versions prior to 6.9.13-50 and 7.1.2-25 are affected. This includes all maintenance releases of the 6.9.x line before 6.9.13-50 and all 7.1.x releases before 7.1.2-25. Organizations should inventory ImageMagick deployments across web servers, containerized applications, development environments, and any infrastructure processing images from untrusted sources. Both direct ImageMagick installations and embedded usage within applications or plugins are potentially vulnerable.
Exploitability
Exploitation requires an attacker to supply a specially-crafted image file to a vulnerable ImageMagick instance, which is straightforward in network-accessible services. However, the CVSS AC:H (high attack complexity) component indicates that successful exploitation depends on overcoming conditions such as memory layout randomization or specific runtime states. This means attacks are possible but not trivial; reliable reproduction across diverse systems may be difficult. The absence from the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog as of the publication date suggests no in-the-wild exploitation has been documented, though this does not guarantee safety.
Remediation
Upgrade ImageMagick to version 6.9.13-50 or later (for the legacy 6.9.x series) or 7.1.2-25 or later (for the current 7.x series). Organizations unable to upgrade immediately should restrict network access to ImageMagick services, disable image processing features if not essential, and implement input validation to reject suspicious or oversized image files. For containerized deployments, rebuilding container images with patched versions is the fastest remediation path.
Patch guidance
Verify your current ImageMagick version using `identify -version` or equivalent. If running 6.9.x, update to 6.9.13-50 or later; if running 7.1.x, update to 7.1.2-25 or later. Consult the official ImageMagick release notes and your package repository (apt, yum, brew, etc.) for availability. In containerized environments, update the base image or rebuild with the latest ImageMagick package version. For statically-linked or custom builds, obtain source code from the official ImageMagick repository and recompile. Test patched versions in a staging environment before production deployment to ensure no regression in image processing workflows.
Detection guidance
Monitor ImageMagick process crashes and core dumps, particularly those triggered by image file processing. Log or alert on unexpected termination of image conversion jobs. If running with debugging symbols, examine crash reports for stack traces mentioning CheckPrimitiveExtent or allocation failures. Network-based detection is limited; focus on application-level monitoring of ImageMagick subprocess lifecycle and resource allocation errors. Organizations using container orchestration can monitor pod restarts or service unavailability correlated with image upload or processing requests.
Why prioritize this
Although rated MEDIUM severity, this vulnerability merits prompt attention because it affects a ubiquitous image-processing library and impacts availability. The ease of triggering a crash via file upload or API endpoints makes it a practical DoS vector. Organizations with customer-facing image services, content platforms, or batch-processing pipelines should prioritize patching. The absence of KEV listing and lack of high CVSS score may lead to false complacency; availability is a critical service attribute.
Risk score, explained
CVSS 3.1 score of 5.9 (MEDIUM) reflects a network-accessible vulnerability with no authentication required and no user interaction needed, but with high attack complexity and impact limited to availability (no confidentiality or integrity loss). The score balances the real threat of denial-of-service attacks against the technical barriers (AC:H) that make reliable exploitation more difficult than simple network probing. Organizations with SLA-sensitive image processing should treat this as higher-risk than the base score alone suggests.
Frequently asked questions
Does this vulnerability allow code execution or data theft?
No. The heap-use-after-free results in a crash (denial of service) only. There is no path to remote code execution, data exfiltration, or integrity compromise. Attacks are limited to disrupting service availability.
Can this be exploited without sending an image file?
Exploitation requires supplying a specially-crafted image file to trigger the allocation failure in CheckPrimitiveExtent. General network connectivity alone is insufficient; an attacker must interact with an API or endpoint that processes image input.
Is there a workaround if we cannot patch immediately?
Reduce exposure by restricting network access to ImageMagick services (firewall rules, authentication), disabling image processing features if not essential, and validating or sanitizing uploaded image files. These are temporary measures; patching remains the proper long-term fix.
Why is this not listed in CISA's KEV catalog?
CISA's KEV catalog tracks vulnerabilities observed in active, targeted exploitation. This CVE may not meet that threshold as of the publication date. Absence from KEV does not indicate the vulnerability is safe; it simply means it has not been weaponized in known campaigns yet.
This analysis is provided for informational purposes and reflects information available as of the publication date (2026-06-10). CVSS scores, patch availability, and threat landscape may change; always consult official vendor advisories and the latest security bulletins before making patch decisions. SEC.co does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of vulnerability data and recommends independent verification against official sources. Exploit code and weaponization details are intentionally omitted from this summary. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-07-20. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).
Related vulnerabilities
- CVE-2026-46523MEDIUMImageMagick Heap-Use-After-Free in MSL Processing
- CVE-2025-55644MEDIUMHeap Use-After-Free in GPAC MP4Box v2.4 DoS Vulnerability
- CVE-2025-55650MEDIUMHeap Use-After-Free in GPAC MP4Box v2.4 DoS Vulnerability
- CVE-2025-60486MEDIUMHeap Use-After-Free in GPAC MP4Box MPEG-2 Dasher – DoS Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-10232MEDIUMAssimp Use-After-Free in ASE Parser (CVSS 5.3)
- CVE-2026-10634MEDIUMZephyr TCP Stack Use-After-Free Race Condition
- CVE-2026-10635MEDIUMXtensa Memory Domain Use-After-Free in Zephyr RTOS
- CVE-2026-10637MEDIUMZephyr IPv6 MLD Use-After-Free Denial of Service