CVE-2026-53239: Linux Kernel xfrm Use-After-Free Privilege Escalation
CVE-2026-53239 is a use-after-free memory corruption vulnerability in the Linux kernel's IPsec policy management subsystem. The flaw occurs in the xfrm (transform) layer when handling policy deletion and rebuild operations concurrently. A local attacker with user-level privileges can trigger a race condition that causes the kernel to access memory that has already been freed, potentially leading to privilege escalation or system crash. This is a kernel-level defect that requires code execution on the target system but no special capabilities to trigger.
Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain
- CVSS
- 3.1 · 7.8 HIGH · CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
- Weaknesses (CWE)
- CWE-416
- Affected products
- 8 configuration(s)
- Published / Modified
- 2026-06-25 / 2026-07-08
NVD description (verbatim)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: xfrm: policy: fix use-after-free on inexact bin in xfrm_policy_bysel_ctx() Fix the race by pruning the bin while still holding xfrm_policy_lock, before dropping it. Use __xfrm_policy_inexact_prune_bin() directly since the lock is already held. The wrapper xfrm_policy_inexact_prune_bin() becomes unused and is removed. Race: CPU0 (XFRM_MSG_DELPOLICY) CPU1 (XFRM_MSG_NEWSPDINFO) ========================== ========================== xfrm_policy_bysel_ctx(): spin_lock_bh(xfrm_policy_lock) bin = xfrm_policy_inexact_lookup() __xfrm_policy_unlink(pol) spin_unlock_bh(xfrm_policy_lock) xfrm_policy_kill(ret) // wide window, lock not held xfrm_hash_rebuild(): spin_lock_bh(xfrm_policy_lock) __xfrm_policy_inexact_flush(): kfree_rcu(bin) // bin freed spin_unlock_bh(xfrm_policy_lock) xfrm_policy_inexact_prune_bin(bin) // UAF: bin is freed
8 reference(s) · View on NVD →
SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source
Technical summary
The vulnerability exists in xfrm_policy_bysel_ctx() within the Linux kernel's IPsec policy framework. A race condition arises between two concurrent operations: (1) XFRM_MSG_DELPOLICY deleting a policy, which acquires the xfrm_policy_lock, removes the policy from its bin, then releases the lock before invoking xfrm_policy_kill(); and (2) XFRM_MSG_NEWSPDINFO triggering a hash rebuild via xfrm_hash_rebuild(), which acquires the lock and calls __xfrm_policy_inexact_flush() to free policy bins via kfree_rcu(). During the window after the first lock release and before the subsequent prune operation, the bin structure can be deallocated by the second CPU, leaving a dangling pointer. When the first CPU later calls xfrm_policy_inexact_prune_bin() on the freed bin, it triggers a use-after-free (UAF) condition. The fix moves the bin pruning operation inside the critical section protected by xfrm_policy_lock, eliminating the unsafe window.
Business impact
Exploitation enables local privilege escalation on affected systems, allowing unprivileged users to gain kernel-level code execution. This permits attackers to compromise confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the host. In containerized or multi-tenant environments, a compromised container or low-privilege process can break isolation boundaries. The impact extends to any service or workload running on the affected kernel, making patch deployment a priority for systems exposed to untrusted local users.
Affected systems
All versions of the Linux kernel using the xfrm IPsec policy subsystem are potentially affected. This includes mainline kernels and distributions (such as Ubuntu, Debian, RHEL, etc.) that carry the vulnerable code. Verify the specific patch version and affected ranges from your distribution's security advisory. Systems with local user access restrictions have lower practical risk than those permitting arbitrary user accounts.
Exploitability
The vulnerability requires local code execution (AV:L) with user-level privileges (PR:L) and no special user interaction (UI:N). However, it is not currently tracked in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog, indicating no active in-the-wild exploitation has been widely reported at the time of CVE publication. The race condition has a narrow trigger window but is reliably reproducible through concurrent syscalls. Exploitation does not require kernel debug symbols or KASLR bypass techniques for denial-of-service outcomes, though reliable code execution may require additional heap grooming or information disclosure.
Remediation
Patch your kernel to a version that includes the fix for this vulnerability. The remedy involves modifying xfrm_policy_bysel_ctx() to call __xfrm_policy_inexact_prune_bin() while the xfrm_policy_lock spinlock is still held, and removing the now-unused wrapper function xfrm_policy_inexact_prune_bin(). Consult your Linux distribution's security advisory for the specific kernel version or patch level that resolves CVE-2026-53239. Reboot is required after kernel patching.
Patch guidance
Contact your Linux vendor (Ubuntu, Debian, Red Hat, SUSE, etc.) for the patched kernel version addressing CVE-2026-53239. Apply patches according to your change management policy, prioritizing systems exposed to untrusted local users. Kernel updates typically require a reboot; schedule downtime accordingly. Verify patch application by checking kernel version post-reboot and confirming the xfrm policy code path no longer contains the UAF window. For custom or self-compiled kernels, apply the upstream commit that relocates the prune operation into the locked critical section.
Detection guidance
Monitor kernel logs (dmesg, journalctl) for memory corruption indicators such as 'use-after-free' warnings, general protection faults, or segmentation faults in kernel code paths involving xfrm_policy_* functions. System-level monitoring tools like kmesg analyzers or automated crash reporting can flag these events. During active exploitation attempts, network-based indicators may be limited; detection relies primarily on host-based telemetry. Consider enabling kernel address sanitizer (KASAN) in test environments to catch UAF conditions early. Intrusion detection systems tuned to xfrm-related syscalls (netlink operations) under high concurrency may detect exploitation patterns.
Why prioritize this
HIGH CVSS (7.8) with local privilege escalation potential warrants expedited patching. The vulnerability is not yet publicly exploited (KEV status: no), providing a window to patch before threat actors weaponize it. Local-only exposure reduces risk in well-segmented networks with restricted user access, but any system permitting untrusted local code (development machines, shared hosting, containers) requires immediate attention. Urgency is elevated for kernel versions with longer support windows.
Risk score, explained
CVSS 3.1 score of 7.8 (HIGH) reflects: local attack vector (AV:L, common in supply chain and privilege escalation chains), low complexity (AC:L, no special conditions needed), low privileges required (PR:L, standard user account sufficient), no user interaction, scope unchanged, and high impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability (C:H/I:H/A:H). The score does not account for exploit code maturity or real-world prevalence; however, the absence from KEV indicates exploitation has not yet become routine.
Frequently asked questions
Can a remote attacker exploit this vulnerability?
No. This is a local-only vulnerability (AV:L) requiring code execution on the target system. Remote attackers cannot trigger it directly over the network. However, if a remote compromise first grants local code execution, the attacker could then weaponize this UAF to escalate privileges.
Do I need to recompile my kernel to fix it?
Not if your Linux distribution provides a patched kernel image. Most vendors (Ubuntu, Red Hat, Debian, etc.) publish kernel updates through their package managers. Only custom or self-compiled kernels require manual patching of the source code and recompilation.
What is the difference between a use-after-free and a buffer overflow?
A use-after-free (CWE-416) occurs when code accesses memory that was previously freed. A buffer overflow writes beyond allocated bounds. UAF is particularly dangerous in kernel context because the freed memory may be reallocated for attacker-controlled data, enabling code execution. This UAF happens in a synchronization-critical code path, making reliable exploitation complex.
If I have no local users on my system, am I safe?
You are at lower risk, but not completely safe. Container escape vectors, privilege escalation from other kernel bugs, and supply chain scenarios can still provide initial local access. Additionally, services running under reduced privileges or in restricted namespaces can attempt exploitation. A defense-in-depth approach includes timely patching regardless of current user posture.
This analysis is based on the vulnerability description and CVSS data provided. Actual exploitability, attack vectors, and patch availability may vary by distribution and kernel version. Organizations should verify CVE details against official Linux vendor advisories before deploying patches. No exploit code or weaponization details are provided herein. This explainer is for defensive security planning and does not constitute a guarantee of vulnerability impact in any specific environment. Always test patches in non-production environments before broad deployment. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-08-03. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).
Related vulnerabilities
- CVE-2026-10001HIGHChrome Sandbox Escape via PerformanceManager Use-After-Free
- CVE-2026-10002HIGHGoogle Chrome PDFium Use-After-Free Vulnerability (CVSS 8.8)
- CVE-2026-10003HIGHChrome Use-After-Free Code Execution Vulnerability Analysis
- CVE-2026-10007HIGHChrome Use-After-Free in SVG Arbitrary Code Execution (CVSS 8.8)
- CVE-2026-10012HIGHChrome Skia Use-After-Free Sandbox Escape (v148.0.7778.216)
- CVE-2026-10013HIGHUse-After-Free in Chrome WebCodecs – Patch Guide & Risk Assessment
- CVE-2026-10016HIGHUse-After-Free in Chrome DOM – Sandbox Code Execution Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-10882HIGHCritical Chrome Use-After-Free RCE Vulnerability – Exploit Details & Patch Guidance