CVE-2026-53077: Linux Kernel RDS/IB Namespace Escape (CVSS 7.8)
CVE-2026-53077 is a Linux kernel vulnerability affecting the Reliable Datagram Sockets (RDS) protocol over InfiniBand (IB). The vulnerability stems from incomplete namespace isolation—RDS/IB operations were not properly restricted to the initial network namespace, allowing code running in non-initial namespaces to trigger malfunctioning behavior. An attacker with local access and unprivileged user privileges can exploit this to read, modify, or crash kernel memory and processes, compromising system integrity and availability.
Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain
- CVSS
- 3.1 · 7.8 HIGH · CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
- Weaknesses (CWE)
- —
- Affected products
- 1 configuration(s)
- Published / Modified
- 2026-06-24 / 2026-07-21
NVD description (verbatim)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/rds: Restrict use of RDS/IB to the initial network namespace Prevent using RDS/IB in network namespaces other than the initial one. The existing RDS/IB code will not work properly in non-initial network namespaces.
8 reference(s) · View on NVD →
SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source
Technical summary
The Linux kernel's RDS/IB implementation lacks proper validation to prevent its use in non-initial network namespaces. Network namespaces are a kernel isolation mechanism that allow processes to have independent network configurations; the RDS/IB code assumes it operates only within the initial (host) namespace and does not function correctly when invoked from other namespaces. This permits a local unprivileged user to manipulate RDS/IB sockets or operations from within a container or user namespace, triggering undefined kernel behavior. The CVSS 3.1 score of 7.8 (HIGH) reflects high impact to confidentiality, integrity, and availability with low attack complexity and no user interaction required.
Business impact
For organizations running containerized workloads, Kubernetes clusters, or multi-tenant systems on Linux, this vulnerability represents a container escape or privilege escalation vector. A malicious or compromised unprivileged container can exploit RDS/IB to read or corrupt host kernel memory, potentially leading to data exfiltration, system crashes, or lateral movement. This is particularly critical for cloud providers, hosting platforms, and enterprises relying on namespace-based isolation for security boundaries. Systems not using RDS/IB or network namespaces face lower practical risk, but patching is recommended for defense-in-depth.
Affected systems
Linux kernel versions that include RDS/IB functionality and do not enforce namespace restrictions are affected. The vulnerability impacts any Linux distribution shipping an affected kernel version where RDS/IB modules are compiled or loaded. Container runtimes, orchestration platforms, and virtualization hosts using Linux kernels with RDS/IB enabled are at risk. Verify your kernel version and configuration against vendor advisories (Red Hat, Canonical, etc.) to determine exposure.
Exploitability
Exploitability is moderate to high in networked and containerized environments. The attack requires local access and operates at the unprivileged user level—no special capabilities or kernel-level code execution are needed for initial exploitation. However, the vulnerability is only exploitable if: (1) the target system uses RDS/IB, (2) the system uses network namespaces (containers, VMs, or user namespaces), and (3) the RDS/IB module is loaded. Environments that do not use RDS/IB or do not isolate processes via namespaces have significantly reduced risk.
Remediation
Apply a kernel patch that restricts RDS/IB socket creation and operations to the initial network namespace. The fix involves adding a namespace check at RDS/IB initialization and operation entry points. Verify patch availability from your Linux distribution vendor (Red Hat, Ubuntu, SUSE, etc.) and test in non-production before rolling out to production systems. Kernel reboot is required after patching. As a temporary mitigation, disable RDS and RDS/IB modules if not required (rmmod rds_rdma, rmmod rds) or restrict namespace usage.
Patch guidance
Contact your Linux distribution vendor (Red Hat Enterprise Linux, Ubuntu, SUSE Linux Enterprise, Debian, etc.) for patched kernel versions. Security advisories from vendors typically specify the affected kernel versions and the versions containing the fix. Apply patches via your standard kernel update mechanism (dnf, apt, zypper, etc.). Due to the local privilege escalation nature, prioritize patching systems hosting containers, multi-tenant workloads, or untrusted user processes. Test patches in staging environments to ensure compatibility with RDS/IB-dependent applications before production deployment. Coordinate kernel updates with downtime windows or use live kernel patching tools if available.
Detection guidance
Monitor for suspicious RDS/IB socket operations originating from non-initial network namespaces using audit logs (auditctl rules for socket syscalls) and eBPF-based tools. Check kernel logs for RDS/IB-related errors or warnings that may indicate exploitation attempts. Use 'lsmod | grep rds' to confirm RDS/IB modules are loaded on production systems. Network intrusion detection systems may observe unusual InfiniBand traffic patterns if RDS/IB is being abused. Implement container security policies (AppArmor, SELinux) to restrict socket operations and namespace usage. Host intrusion detection systems and runtime security tools should flag attempts to create RDS sockets from within non-initial namespaces.
Why prioritize this
This vulnerability scores HIGH due to its impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability combined with low attack complexity. It is particularly critical for organizations operating containerized infrastructure, multi-tenant systems, or Kubernetes clusters where namespace isolation is a fundamental security boundary. The local unprivileged attack vector means any container or non-root user with access to the system can attempt exploitation. However, impact is limited to environments actually using RDS/IB, making prioritization risk-contextual. Organizations not using RDS/IB should still patch for defense-in-depth and to simplify inventory management.
Risk score, explained
The CVSS 3.1 score of 7.8 reflects: Attack Vector (Local) — attacker must have shell access, but no special privileges; Attack Complexity (Low) — no special conditions or race conditions required; Privileges Required (Low) — exploitation by unprivileged user; User Interaction (None) — no social engineering or user clicks needed; Scope (Unchanged) — impact limited to the vulnerable component and system; Confidentiality (High), Integrity (High), Availability (High) — kernel memory exposure and crash potential. The score does not account for reduced exposure in RDS/IB-free deployments; organizations should contextualize this within their own infrastructure footprint.
Frequently asked questions
Does this affect systems not using RDS/IB?
Unlikely. RDS/IB is a specialized networking protocol used primarily in high-performance computing and some enterprise storage environments. If your systems do not load rds_rdma or rds kernel modules, you are not directly vulnerable. However, Linux distributions often include RDS/IB support in default kernels, so verification is recommended. Use 'lsmod | grep rds' to check.
Can this be exploited from a container without special capabilities?
Yes. This is a key concern for containerized deployments. Even an unprivileged container running in a non-initial network namespace can trigger RDS/IB malfunction if the module is loaded on the host. No CAP_SYS_ADMIN or other elevated capabilities are required. This makes it a container-escape risk in multi-tenant environments.
What is the difference between this and a traditional local privilege escalation?
Traditional LPE exploits target kernel vulnerabilities to gain root from unprivileged user shell access. This vulnerability allows unprivileged code (already constrained by namespace isolation) to break out of that isolation boundary by abusing RDS/IB. It is both a privilege escalation (gaining access beyond intended boundaries) and a namespace escape.
Do I need to reboot immediately after patching?
Yes. Kernel patches require a full reboot to take effect. Plan maintenance windows accordingly. Some organizations use live kernel patching solutions (e.g., kpatch, kGraft) to defer reboots, but verify that the specific patch is supported by your live patching tool. Verify with your vendor before relying on this approach.
This analysis is provided for informational purposes and is based on publicly available vulnerability data as of the publication date. SEC.co makes no warranty regarding the accuracy, completeness, or applicability of this information to your specific environment. CVSS scores are provided by the CVE record and do not reflect organizational risk context. Patch availability, version numbers, and remediation steps must be verified against official vendor security advisories. Always test patches in non-production environments before deploying to production. This document does not constitute legal, compliance, or professional security advice. Consult with your security team, vendor support, and relevant compliance frameworks when making remediation decisions. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-08-01. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).
Affected vendors
Related vulnerabilities
- CVE-2026-0270HIGHCortex XSOAR Path Traversal on Linux — Exploit Requirements & Patching Guide
- CVE-2026-0271HIGHPalo Alto Networks Prisma Access Agent Linux Privilege Escalation
- CVE-2026-10001HIGHChrome Sandbox Escape via PerformanceManager Use-After-Free
- CVE-2026-10002HIGHGoogle Chrome PDFium Use-After-Free Vulnerability (CVSS 8.8)
- CVE-2026-10003HIGHChrome Use-After-Free Code Execution Vulnerability Analysis
- CVE-2026-10006HIGHChrome WebAudio Race Condition Remote Code Execution
- CVE-2026-10007HIGHChrome Use-After-Free in SVG Arbitrary Code Execution (CVSS 8.8)
- CVE-2026-10009HIGHChrome Skia Integer Overflow Sandbox Escape – Patch Guidance