HIGH 7.1

CVE-2026-53068: Linux Kernel Komeda DRM Integer Overflow – Patch & Detection Guide

A vulnerability exists in the Linux kernel's display driver (DRM/Komeda) where a math error during framebuffer validation can allow a user to trick the system into accepting an undersized memory buffer. When the kernel adds two numbers together to check buffer size requirements, it doesn't protect against arithmetic overflow—if the sum wraps around to a small number, a malformed request passes validation when it shouldn't. This could lead to memory access outside the intended buffer boundaries, potentially exposing sensitive data or causing system instability.

Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain

CVSS
3.1 · 7.1 HIGH · CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H
Weaknesses (CWE)
CWE-190
Affected products
1 configuration(s)
Published / Modified
2026-06-24 / 2026-07-21

NVD description (verbatim)

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/komeda: fix integer overflow in AFBC framebuffer size check The AFBC framebuffer size validation calculates the minimum required buffer size by adding the AFBC payload size to the framebuffer offset. This addition is performed without checking for integer overflow. If the addition oveflows, the size check may incorrectly succed and allow userspace to provide an undersized drm_gem_object, potentially leading to out-of-bounds memory access. Add usage of check_add_overflow() to safely compute the minimum required size and reject the framebuffer if an overflow is detected. This makes the AFBC size validation more robust against malformed. Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.

8 reference(s) · View on NVD →

SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source

Technical summary

CVE-2026-53068 is an integer overflow vulnerability in the Linux kernel's Komeda DRM driver, specifically in AFBC (Arm Frame Buffer Compression) framebuffer size validation. The vulnerable code path adds the AFBC payload size to a framebuffer offset without overflow detection. If this addition overflows, the resulting size check evaluates incorrectly, permitting userspace to supply a drm_gem_object smaller than required. The fix applies check_add_overflow() to safely compute minimum buffer requirements and reject framebuffers that would cause overflow. This follows CWE-190 (Integer Overflow or Wraparound) patterns.

Business impact

Exploitation is limited to local user privilege contexts and requires intentional submission of malformed framebuffer configuration. Successful exploitation could result in out-of-bounds memory reads, potentially leaking kernel or application data, or causing denial of service through memory access violations. The impact is constrained to systems using the Komeda display driver (primarily ARM-based platforms) and affects confidentiality and availability but not integrity in the primary attack vector.

Affected systems

The Linux kernel versions utilizing the Komeda DRM driver are affected. This driver is primarily deployed on ARM-based systems with Komeda display controllers. The vulnerability requires local user access to trigger; remote exploitation is not possible. Distributions shipping affected kernel versions without the patch are at risk, particularly those supporting ARM Mali or similar display hardware.

Exploitability

Exploitability is moderate but practically limited. The attack requires local user privileges (PR:L), is not complex (AC:L), and does not require user interaction (UI:N). No known public exploit exists (KEV status: false), but the vulnerability is straightforward to understand and reproduce once framebuffer configuration internals are understood. The barrier to weaponization is moderate, not a zero-click remote vector.

Remediation

Patch the Linux kernel to a version that includes the integer overflow fix. Verify the patch against the kernel security advisory or your distribution's update channels. For systems where immediate patching is infeasible, restrict framebuffer configuration access to trusted applications and enforce least-privilege user policies to minimize local attack surface. Long-term mitigation requires applying the upstream kernel fix.

Patch guidance

Check your Linux distribution's security advisories and kernel release notes for the patched version addressing CVE-2026-53068. Apply kernel updates through your standard patch management process (e.g., apt, yum, or your distribution's equivalent). Verify the patch is included by checking kernel changelogs or CVSS tracking resources. If you maintain a custom kernel, ensure the check_add_overflow() fix is backported to your active branches.

Detection guidance

Monitor system logs for framebuffer allocation errors, GPU driver warnings, or memory access violations following failed framebuffer submissions. Intrusion detection can flag unusual framebuffer configuration attempts with extreme offset or size values. Monitor for any kernel oops or panic messages related to DRM/Komeda driver memory operations. On affected ARM systems, enable DRM debug logging to capture rejected or suspicious framebuffer configurations.

Why prioritize this

This vulnerability scores 7.1 (HIGH) due to the combination of high-impact potential (information disclosure + denial of service), local attack vector, and the foundational nature of display driver code. Although exploitation requires local access and is not yet in active use (KEV: false), the straightforward overflow condition and potential for memory corruption make it a near-term risk. Prioritize patching systems where Komeda drivers are in use and where local user access is permitted or difficult to restrict (shared compute systems, development workstations).

Risk score, explained

The CVSS 3.1 score of 7.1 reflects: (1) Attack Vector: Local, reducing remote risk; (2) Attack Complexity: Low, the overflow is trivial to trigger; (3) Privileges Required: Low, a standard user can exploit this; (4) User Interaction: None, no social engineering required; (5) Scope: Unchanged, impact is confined to the affected system; (6) Confidentiality: High, kernel or sensitive application memory may be leaked; (7) Integrity: None, memory is not corrupted (read-only side channel); (8) Availability: High, out-of-bounds access can crash the driver or system. The HIGH severity reflects the direct path to meaningful compromise for local attackers, despite the local-only constraint.

Frequently asked questions

Does this vulnerability allow remote code execution?

No. This is a local vulnerability requiring user-level privileges on the system. Remote exploitation is not possible. Impact is limited to information disclosure or denial of service through memory access violations.

Which Linux systems are affected?

Systems using the Komeda display driver, primarily ARM-based platforms with Komeda or Mali display controllers. x86/x64 systems without Komeda hardware are not affected. Verify your system's DRM driver configuration using 'lsmod | grep komeda' or your kernel's device tree configuration.

Can I mitigate this without patching the kernel?

Partial mitigation is possible by restricting framebuffer configuration privileges to trusted applications and enforcing user access controls. However, the upstream kernel patch is the recommended fix. Patching is the only complete remediation.

What is check_add_overflow() and why does it prevent this?

check_add_overflow() is a kernel macro that safely adds two integers and detects if the result wraps around due to overflow. The vulnerable code simply added two values without checking; the fix ensures the calculation is safe, and if overflow would occur, the framebuffer request is rejected before memory access happens.

This analysis is based on the published CVE description and CVSS data as of the source date. Actual impact and patch availability vary by Linux distribution and kernel version. Test patches in non-production environments before deployment. No exploit code or proof-of-concept is provided. Consult your vendor's security advisory for authoritative remediation guidance. SEC.co makes no warranty regarding completeness or accuracy of this assessment. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-08-01. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).