MEDIUM 5.5

CVE-2026-52937: Linux Kernel TAP Driver Stack Memory Leak Defeats KASLR

A vulnerability in the Linux kernel's tap network interface driver leaks sensitive kernel memory to unprivileged local users. When a user queries the hardware address of a tap or macvtap device using standard network tools, the kernel copies an incompletely initialized data structure to userspace, inadvertently disclosing 8 bytes of kernel stack contents. On systems running macvtap, this leak can expose kernel code pointers and direct-map memory addresses, undermining KASLR (kernel address space layout randomization) protections and providing attackers with information useful for exploiting other vulnerabilities.

Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain

CVSS
3.1 · 5.5 MEDIUM · CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Weaknesses (CWE)
CWE-401
Affected products
5 configuration(s)
Published / Modified
2026-06-24 / 2026-07-08

NVD description (verbatim)

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tap: fix stack info leak in tap_ioctl() SIOCGIFHWADDR In the SIOCGIFHWADDR path, tap_ioctl() copies 16 bytes of an uninitialised on-stack struct sockaddr_storage to userspace via ifr_hwaddr, but netif_get_mac_address() only writes sa_family and dev->addr_len (6 for Ethernet) bytes, leaving sa_data[6..13] uninitialised. Those 8 trailing bytes leak kernel stack contents; SIOCGIFHWADDR on a macvtap chardev returns kernel .text and direct-map pointers, defeating KASLR. Initialise ss at declaration.

3 reference(s) · View on NVD →

SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source

Technical summary

The tap_ioctl() function in the Linux kernel tap driver handles the SIOCGIFHWADDR ioctl, which retrieves a network interface's hardware address. The code declares an uninitialized sockaddr_storage structure on the stack and passes it to netif_get_mac_address(). That function writes only the sa_family field and up to dev->addr_len bytes (typically 6 for Ethernet) into the sa_data array, but the structure itself is 16 bytes. This leaves sa_data[6..13]—eight bytes—uninitialized with whatever stack contents were present. The ioctl then copies the entire 16-byte structure to userspace via ifr_hwaddr without zeroing the trailing bytes. The fix initializes the sockaddr_storage structure to zero at declaration, ensuring no uninitialized data reaches userspace.

Business impact

This vulnerability enables information disclosure from the kernel to unprivileged local users, a critical stepping stone in privilege escalation or kernel exploitation chains. The specific leakage of KASLR-defeating pointers on macvtap systems weakens the OS defense posture. Any organization running tap or macvtap devices (common in virtualization, container, and network namespace environments) may have user-accessible tap devices that can be exploited. The threat is primarily relevant in multi-tenant or hostile-local-user threat models; isolated single-user systems face lower risk.

Affected systems

The Linux kernel is affected; the vulnerability exists in the tap driver code present across multiple kernel versions. Tap and macvtap devices are used extensively in KVM-based virtualization, LXC containers, Open vSwitch, and other network virtualization scenarios. Any Linux system exposing tap device management to untrusted local users—including container hosts, hypervisors with unprivileged guests, and systems with unprivileged network namespaces—is in scope. The kernel version cutoff and specific fixed versions depend on the distribution; verify against your kernel source and vendor advisories.

Exploitability

Exploitability is straightforward for a local user with access to a tap or macvtap device. Standard network inspection tools (e.g., ifconfig, ip link) on a tap device trigger the leak; no special capabilities are required beyond ability to open and ioctl a tap chardev. However, this is a local-only vulnerability (CVSS:3.1 AV:L) requiring prior system access. The leak is deterministic and repeatable, but converting the disclosed pointers into a full exploit depends on chaining this with other kernel vulnerabilities. It is not currently tracked in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.

Remediation

Apply the kernel patch that initializes the sockaddr_storage structure to zero before use in tap_ioctl(). Check your Linux distribution's security advisories and kernel update schedule for the patched version. Most major distributions (Red Hat, Debian, Ubuntu, SUSE, etc.) will release updates; timelines vary. For systems unable to patch immediately, restrict tap device access (via file permissions, AppArmor, or SELinux) to trusted users only, though this may break legitimate container or virtualization workloads.

Patch guidance

Kernel patches for this issue follow standard Linux development workflows and will be backported to stable and long-term-support branches. Check your distribution's errata pages and kernel changelogs. Typical guidance: update the kernel package to the first available version containing the fix for your kernel branch (verify the fix commit or changelog mentions tap_ioctl and sockaddr_storage initialization). For custom kernels, apply the upstream patch. Test in a staging environment given the invasive nature of kernel updates, particularly on systems with network virtualization dependencies.

Detection guidance

Detection at runtime is difficult because this is a passive information leak with no system-level side effects (no crash, no audit event triggered by the ioctl itself). Kernel-based detection would require live-patching or BPF probes to monitor tap_ioctl calls, but such hooks are not standard. Detection strategies: (1) audit-log and alert on tap device opens and ioctl calls for suspicious users; (2) scan kernel memory or core dumps post-mortem for leaked pointers and correlate timing with tap device access; (3) monitor for exploitation of derived kernel vulnerabilities (which attackers would chain with this leak). The most practical approach is version scanning and patch compliance monitoring.

Why prioritize this

Although classified as MEDIUM severity (CVSS 5.5), this vulnerability merits high priority in environments with unprivileged user access to tap devices because it directly enables KASLR bypass, a foundational step in kernel exploitation. In single-user or air-gapped systems, risk is lower. For container platforms (Kubernetes, Docker on Linux) and multi-tenant hypervisors, treat as high priority and patch promptly. The low barrier to local exploitation and the deterministic nature of the leak justify expedited patching in shared-tenancy or hostile-local-user scenarios.

Risk score, explained

CVSS 5.5 (MEDIUM) reflects local-only access requirement (AV:L) and low complexity (AC:L), but the lack of confidentiality loss in the CVSS vector understates the practical impact: kernel pointers defeat KASLR, a critical mitigation. The score penalizes lack of direct system compromise, yet in real-world kernel exploitation chains, this leak is a high-value information primitive. Organizations should apply business context: elevate priority if running container platforms or multi-tenant systems; de-prioritize only if tap devices are inaccessible to untrusted users.

Frequently asked questions

Does this vulnerability allow remote exploitation?

No. This is a local-only vulnerability requiring prior access to a Linux system and the ability to open and ioctl a tap or macvtap device. Remote attackers cannot trigger it directly over the network.

What is KASLR and why does this leak matter?

KASLR (kernel address space layout randomization) randomizes the memory addresses of kernel code and data at boot, making it harder for attackers to craft reliable exploits. This vulnerability leaks actual kernel and direct-map pointers, allowing an attacker to defeat KASLR and learn the true addresses needed for a precise kernel exploit.

Is my system affected if I don't use tap or macvtap?

Likely not. The vulnerability requires a tap or macvtap device to be present and accessible. If your system does not use network virtualization (KVM with tap, Open vSwitch, LXC with macvtap, etc.), tap devices are probably not present. Verify with `ip link` or `ls /dev/tap*`; if nothing appears, the attack surface is minimal.

Can I mitigate this without patching the kernel?

Partial mitigation is possible: restrict file permissions on tap device nodes (e.g., `/dev/tap*`) to trusted users only, or use AppArmor/SELinux to deny tap ioctl access to unprivileged users. However, this may break legitimate container and virtualization workloads. Full remediation requires a patched kernel.

This analysis is provided for informational purposes and represents the current understanding of CVE-2026-52937 as of the publication date. The vulnerability details, patch status, and affected versions are based on upstream Linux kernel disclosures and vendor advisories; verify specific patch availability and version numbers with your Linux distribution's security advisories before deployment. No exploit code or proof-of-concept steps are provided. Organizations should conduct their own risk assessment based on their infrastructure, threat model, and patch management policies. SEC.co makes no warranty regarding the accuracy or completeness of this analysis and disclaims liability for any actions taken or omitted in reliance upon it. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-07-30. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).