HIGH 7.1

CVE-2026-5230: High-Severity Access Control Bypass in Pizzy Library

CVE-2026-5230 is a high-severity access control flaw in MIA Technology Inc.'s Pizzy Library that allows authenticated users to bypass authorization checks and access data or functionality they shouldn't have permission to reach. The vulnerability stems from incorrectly configured security levels that fail to properly validate user privileges. Versions 1.0.0.26250 through 1.3.8.26250 are affected; upgrading to 1.3.9.26250 or later resolves the issue.

Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain

CVSS
3.1 · 7.1 HIGH · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
Weaknesses (CWE)
CWE-284, CWE-862
Affected products
0 configuration(s)
Published / Modified
2026-06-15 / 2026-06-17

NVD description (verbatim)

Improper Access Control, Missing Authorization vulnerability in MIA Technology Inc. Pizzy Library allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels. This issue affects Pizzy Library: from 1.0.0.26250 before 1.3.9.26250.

1 reference(s) · View on NVD →

SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source

Technical summary

This vulnerability involves two distinct access control weaknesses (CWE-284: Improper Access Control and CWE-862: Missing Authorization) in the Pizzy Library. The flaw allows an authenticated attacker to exploit misconfigured access control rules to gain unauthorized access to protected resources or operations. The CVSS v3.1 score of 7.1 reflects a network-accessible attack requiring valid credentials, with high confidentiality impact and limited integrity impact, but no availability impact. The vulnerability does not require user interaction and affects the confidentiality scope of the system.

Business impact

Successful exploitation could expose sensitive data to authenticated users who lack legitimate authorization, creating compliance violations under regulations like GDPR, HIPAA, or SOC 2. Organizations using Pizzy Library in production may face data breach risk, audit findings, and reputational damage if the flaw is exploited. The financial impact depends on the volume and sensitivity of data accessible through the misconfigured access controls. This is particularly serious in multi-tenant or role-based access control (RBAC) scenarios where isolation between user tiers is critical.

Affected systems

MIA Technology Inc. Pizzy Library versions from 1.0.0.26250 up to and including 1.3.8.26250 are vulnerable. Any application or service that embeds or depends on Pizzy Library within this version range and leverages its access control mechanisms is at risk. Organizations should inventory applications using Pizzy Library and verify which versions are deployed in their environments.

Exploitability

The vulnerability requires an attacker to have valid authentication credentials to the system. There is no evidence of public exploit code or active exploitation in the wild at this time (the CVE is not listed on CISA's KEV catalog). However, the low attack complexity and network accessibility make it a practical target once credentials are obtained—for example, through phishing, credential reuse, or insider threat. The barrier to exploitation is relatively low for an authenticated insider.

Remediation

Upgrade Pizzy Library to version 1.3.9.26250 or later. This patch version corrects the access control validation logic and enforces proper authorization checks. Before patching, validate that your deployment will not break dependent integrations. After patching, conduct access control testing to confirm that users can only access resources appropriate to their roles.

Patch guidance

Consult MIA Technology Inc.'s official release notes and security advisory for version 1.3.9.26250 to confirm this patch addresses CVE-2026-5230. Perform patching in a staging environment first to validate compatibility with your application stack. Plan for a controlled rollout to production, prioritizing systems that handle sensitive or regulated data. Verify the patch by testing that privilege escalation attempts are blocked and that access control rules are enforced correctly.

Detection guidance

Monitor application logs for suspicious access patterns, such as authenticated users requesting resources outside their assigned roles or attempting operations that should be denied by access controls. Search for failed authorization events or HTTP 403 responses where an authenticated user was denied access. Review audit trails for data access by users with insufficient privileges. Network-based detection is less effective; endpoint and application-level logging are essential. Conduct a privilege-level audit to identify any users or sessions that may have already exploited this flaw.

Why prioritize this

Although not yet on CISA's KEV list, this vulnerability warrants prompt attention due to its high CVSS score (7.1), potential for data exposure, and applicability across regulated industries. The requirement for valid credentials reduces immediate external threat, but insider risk and compromised account scenarios make this a significant near-term concern. Organizations handling sensitive data should prioritize patching this vulnerability within their normal maintenance windows, typically within 30 days of release.

Risk score, explained

The CVSS 7.1 (HIGH) score reflects the combination of network accessibility (AV:N), low attack complexity (AC:L), requirement for low-level authentication (PR:L), high confidentiality impact (C:H), and modest integrity impact (I:L). The vector indicates that any user with valid credentials—even with minimal privileges—can exploit the flaw to read sensitive data. The absence of availability impact and the scoped nature of the threat (affecting only the confidentiality of the target application's data) prevent a critical rating, but the high likelihood of successful exploitation in environments with weak access control governance justifies the HIGH severity classification.

Frequently asked questions

Do I need to patch immediately if Pizzy Library is not directly exposed to untrusted networks?

Yes. The vulnerability requires only valid credentials, not network exposure. If your application processes requests from any authenticated user (internal employees, customers, partners), the risk exists. Interior-network-only deployments may have slightly lower risk, but privilege escalation by insiders remains a credible threat.

What should I do if I cannot upgrade to 1.3.9.26250 right away?

As an interim measure, implement additional access control layers outside of Pizzy Library—for example, enforce RBAC at the application gateway or middleware level to restrict which authenticated users can access which resources. Monitor closely for exploitation attempts. However, compensating controls are not a substitute for patching; develop a timeline to upgrade within 30 days if possible.

How do I verify that Pizzy Library version 1.3.9.26250 is secure?

Check the official MIA Technology Inc. security advisory and release notes for version 1.3.9.26250 to confirm the fix. After deployment, test your application's access controls by attempting to perform unauthorized actions with low-privileged accounts; these attempts should be denied. Automated security testing or role-based access control testing tools can help validate the fix.

Is this vulnerability actively being exploited?

As of the latest data, CVE-2026-5230 is not listed on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog, indicating no confirmed public exploitation. However, the vulnerability is straightforward to exploit once credentials are obtained, so proactive patching is important to reduce the window of opportunity for attackers.

This analysis is provided for informational purposes. SEC.co makes no warranty regarding the completeness or accuracy of vendor-supplied information. Always verify patch availability and compatibility against the official MIA Technology Inc. advisory before deploying updates. CVSS scores and severity ratings are based on the National Vulnerability Database (NVD) and do not constitute a recommendation for any specific organization. Each organization should conduct its own risk assessment based on its environment, regulatory requirements, and threat landscape. SEC.co is not responsible for any operational impact arising from the use or misuse of this intelligence. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-07-24. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).