CVE-2026-50176: WebSocket API Missing Rate Limiting on Authentication Requests
CVE-2026-50176 is a flaw in the WebSocket API that fails to limit how many authentication attempts a user or attacker can make in a given time period. Without rate limiting, attackers can hammer the authentication endpoint with repeated login attempts—either to knock the service offline through sheer volume, or to systematically guess credentials. The vulnerability carries a HIGH severity rating because it directly enables denial-of-service and credential compromise attacks that require no special privileges and no user interaction to initiate.
Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain
- CVSS
- 3.1 · 7.5 HIGH · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
- Weaknesses (CWE)
- CWE-307
- Affected products
- 0 configuration(s)
- Published / Modified
- 2026-06-25 / 2026-06-26
NVD description (verbatim)
The WebSocket Application Programming Interface lacks restrictions on the number of authentication requests. This absence of rate limiting may allow an attacker to conduct denial-of-service attacks or brute-force attacks to gain unauthorized access.
3 reference(s) · View on NVD →
SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source
Technical summary
The WebSocket API implementation does not enforce rate limiting on authentication requests, creating an unrestricted attack surface for both volumetric denial-of-service and credential enumeration. The vulnerability is classified under CWE-307 (Improper Restriction of Excessive Authentication Attempts), indicating the root cause is missing or inadequate controls on request frequency thresholds. The CVSS 3.1 score of 7.5 reflects a high-severity network-reachable flaw with no authentication prerequisite (PR:N), no user interaction required (UI:N), and direct impact to service availability (A:H). The absence of complexity requirements (AC:L) means exploitation is straightforward.
Business impact
An attacker exploiting this vulnerability can disrupt service availability by overwhelming the WebSocket authentication endpoint with traffic, degrading or fully denying access to legitimate users. Simultaneously, the lack of request throttling enables brute-force attacks against user credentials, potentially leading to unauthorized account access and lateral movement within the system. Organizations relying on WebSocket-based applications for real-time communication or authentication workflows face compounded risk: operational downtime combined with the prospect of account compromise and data exposure.
Affected systems
The source data does not enumerate specific vendor products or versions. To identify which systems in your environment are affected, consult the official vendor security advisories and product documentation for any WebSocket API implementations in use. Verify whether your applications or third-party services expose WebSocket authentication endpoints without rate limiting. Testing or reviewing authentication logs for unusual spike patterns in failed login attempts can help detect potential exposure.
Exploitability
This vulnerability is highly exploitable. An attacker needs only network access to the WebSocket endpoint—no authentication, no social engineering, no client-side bypass required. Brute-force tooling is commodity; a simple loop of WebSocket frames containing login attempts will suffice. The absence of rate limiting means each attempt succeeds in reaching the authentication logic, making both denial-of-service and credential guessing attacks viable with minimal effort and detection may be delayed if logging is insufficient.
Remediation
Implement strict rate limiting on WebSocket authentication requests at the application or API gateway layer. Common approaches include throttling to a fixed number of attempts per source IP per time window (e.g., 5 failed attempts per 15 minutes), or implementing account lockouts after repeated failures. Enforce this control before requests reach the authentication logic. Additionally, enable comprehensive logging and alerting on failed authentication attempts to detect abuse patterns in real time. Verify the fix against vendor patches or apply compensating controls if patching is delayed.
Patch guidance
Consult your WebSocket API vendor's security advisory for the specific patch version and deployment procedure. Apply patches to production systems according to your change management process, prioritizing systems that expose WebSocket authentication to untrusted networks. If the vendor has not yet released a patch, implement rate limiting at the API gateway or firewall level as a temporary mitigation. Test the patched or mitigated configuration in a staging environment to confirm that legitimate authentication traffic is not disrupted.
Detection guidance
Monitor WebSocket endpoints for spikes in authentication request volume from single source IPs, or clusters of failed login attempts over short time windows. Analyze authentication logs for patterns consistent with brute-force activity (many attempts against the same or multiple accounts from the same source). Configure alerts on error rates that exceed baseline thresholds. Network-level monitoring (IDS/IPS) can detect high-frequency connection or request patterns to WebSocket ports. Behavioral analytics on account access patterns (unusual login times, locations, devices) can flag compromised accounts resulting from successful brute-force attacks.
Why prioritize this
This vulnerability merits immediate attention due to its high CVSS score (7.5), straightforward exploitability, and dual impact: service disruption and credential compromise. The lack of rate limiting is a fundamental design flaw rather than a subtle logic error, making it likely to exist in multiple codebases. Organizations should prioritize inventory and patching of affected WebSocket implementations. The combination of no authentication barrier and direct availability impact elevates risk in any environment where WebSocket APIs handle sensitive operations or serve critical functions.
Risk score, explained
The CVSS 3.1 score of 7.5 reflects: network-reachable attack vector (AV:N), low attack complexity (AC:L), no privilege required (PR:N), no user interaction required (UI:N), and high impact to availability (A:H). No impact to confidentiality or integrity is scored, as the primary threat is denial-of-service; credential compromise is a secondary concern not directly modeled in CVSS availability metrics. The HIGH severity designation is appropriate given the ease of exploitation and direct harm to service continuity.
Frequently asked questions
Can an attacker use this flaw to steal user credentials?
Yes, indirectly. The lack of rate limiting on authentication requests enables brute-force attacks, allowing an attacker to systematically guess passwords or enumerate valid usernames. Once credentials are compromised, the attacker gains unauthorized access. This is why the vulnerability poses both availability and confidentiality risk.
Do I need to be authenticated to exploit this vulnerability?
No. The vulnerability exists precisely because there is no authentication requirement on the authentication endpoint itself. An attacker on the network can send WebSocket frames with login attempts without any prior authorization.
What is the difference between rate limiting and account lockouts?
Rate limiting caps the number of requests from a given source (IP address) within a time window, slowing down brute-force attempts. Account lockouts temporarily disable an account after a threshold of failed logins, preventing further guessing. Both are effective; many systems implement both in layers for defense in depth.
How long does it typically take an attacker to brute-force credentials if there is no rate limiting?
Time depends on password complexity, wordlist size, and attacker bandwidth. Weak passwords (common words, short length) may be cracked in hours or minutes; complex passwords require longer. Rate limiting forces delays that make brute-force impractical regardless of password strength, which is why it is essential.
This analysis is based on the vulnerability description and CVSS vector provided as of the published date. No vendor products or versions are enumerated in the source data; consult official vendor advisories to determine which systems are affected. Exploitation details, proof-of-concept code, and specific patch version numbers are not included. Organizations should validate all remediation steps in non-production environments before deploying to production and verify patch applicability with their vendors. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-08-04. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).
Weaknesses (CWE)
Related vulnerabilities
- CVE-2026-35675HIGHphpMyFAQ Password Reset Authentication Bypass – Account Takeover
- CVE-2026-36607HIGHMercusys AC12G Router Brute-Force Vulnerability – Rate Limiting Bypass
- CVE-2026-45364HIGHBetter Auth IPv6 Rate Limiter Bypass
- CVE-2026-53904HIGHMCO Password Reset Denial of Service Vulnerability (CVSS 7.1)
- CVE-2026-55501HIGH9Router Login Rate-Limit Bypass – Dashboard Brute-Force Risk
- CVE-2026-10216LOWWeak Authentication Rate-Limiting in unitedbyai Droidclaw
- CVE-2026-36612MEDIUMMercusys AC12G Weak WPS Lockout Policy Enables Router Compromise
- CVE-2026-49324MEDIUM2025 Indian Motorcycle Scout Bobber + Tech Immobilizer Lockout Vulnerability