CVE-2026-50108: Naxclow Platform API Authorization Bypass Exposes Device Relay Credentials
Naxclow's platform API contains a flaw that leaks persistent credentials used for device relay registration. An attacker who can craft a valid API request signature can retrieve relay credentials for any device—even devices they don't own—and impersonate that device on the relay network. This enables the attacker to intercept, monitor, or disrupt communications for compromised devices without needing to breach the device itself.
Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain
- CVSS
- 3.1 · 7.5 HIGH · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
- Weaknesses (CWE)
- CWE-862
- Affected products
- 0 configuration(s)
- Published / Modified
- 2026-06-12 / 2026-06-17
NVD description (verbatim)
The Naxclow platform API that returns device relay registration details exposes a persistent credential without verifying that the requester is the legitimate device or owner. An actor able to present a platform-valid request signature can retrieve credentials for arbitrary devices and register on the relay as that device, enabling interception and disruption of its communications.
2 reference(s) · View on NVD →
SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source
Technical summary
CVE-2026-50108 is an authorization bypass in the Naxclow platform API endpoint responsible for returning device relay registration credentials. The vulnerability stems from insufficient verification of requestor identity and ownership. The API accepts platform-valid request signatures but does not validate that the requester is either the device itself or the legitimate owner before returning persistent credentials. An attacker able to generate or replay a valid signature can enumerate and retrieve relay credentials for arbitrary devices. These credentials enable registration on the relay infrastructure as the target device, permitting traffic interception and potential man-in-the-middle attacks. The vulnerability is classified under CWE-862 (Missing Authorization).
Business impact
This vulnerability directly threatens the confidentiality and integrity of device communications for all Naxclow platform deployments. Organizations relying on Naxclow for device relay and command-and-control face risk of unauthorized traffic interception, sensitive data exfiltration, and operational disruption. An attacker exploiting this flaw could silently monitor communications of critical devices without detection, extract configuration data or transmitted payloads, or inject malicious commands. The attack requires no user interaction and leaves minimal forensic traces if the attacker is careful. For industries leveraging Naxclow in IoT, industrial control, or managed device fleets, the business impact extends to regulatory compliance violations, loss of customer trust, and potential supply chain contamination.
Affected systems
All versions of the Naxclow platform are affected by this authorization bypass. The vulnerability exists in the API endpoint that serves device relay registration credentials. Any deployment exposing this API endpoint to network requests is susceptible, provided the attacker can obtain or forge a valid platform request signature. No specific product version information is available in current advisories; verify the scope and affected versions against official Naxclow vendor guidance.
Exploitability
Exploitation requires no special privileges, no user interaction, and no authentication specific to a target device. The primary barrier is obtaining or generating a valid platform-level request signature. If the signature generation mechanism is weak, predictable, or shared across multiple requestors, exploitation becomes straightforward. Once a valid signature is obtained, the attack is trivial: craft an API request for the target device's relay credentials and register on the relay. The attack is remotely exploitable over the network and leaves no obvious indicators of successful exploitation on the targeted device itself. The CVSS 3.1 score of 7.5 (High) reflects the high confidentiality impact and ease of exploitation, though integrity impact is not present and availability impact is not scored in the base metric.
Remediation
Naxclow must implement strict authorization checks in the device relay registration API. The endpoint should verify that the requester is either the device itself (authenticated via device credentials) or the registered owner (authenticated via user credentials) before returning persistent relay credentials. Request signature validation should be strengthened to prevent forgery or reuse across different requestors. Additionally, Naxclow should consider implementing credential rotation policies, audit logging of all credential requests and relay registrations, and network segmentation to restrict API access to trusted network boundaries. Organizations should immediately check for suspicious relay registrations and credential requests in their audit logs.
Patch guidance
Consult the official Naxclow security advisory and vendor website for patched versions and deployment instructions. Apply patches to all instances of the Naxclow platform as soon as they become available. If patches are not yet available, work with Naxclow support to understand interim mitigation strategies. Test patches in a non-production environment before rolling out to production infrastructure. Verify that the patched version includes proper owner and device identity verification in the relay credential API endpoint.
Detection guidance
Monitor your Naxclow platform API logs for unusual patterns: repeated requests for device relay credentials from unfamiliar source IPs or accounts, requests for credentials of devices not owned by the requester, or spikes in credential retrieval activity. Review relay registration logs for devices registering with unexpected source IPs or unusual timestamps. Implement alerting on failed or repeated attempts to access the credential endpoint. If you have network telemetry, look for traffic to relay servers originating from unexpected internal or external sources. Conduct a full audit of existing relay registrations and cross-reference them with legitimate device inventory.
Why prioritize this
This vulnerability warrants immediate attention due to its high CVSS score, ease of exploitation, and silent nature. An attacker can compromise device communications without triggering typical security alerts or requiring interaction with the targeted device. The fact that it is not yet on the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) list does not diminish the risk—threat actors may already be aware of and actively exploiting this authorization bypass. Any organization running Naxclow should treat this as a priority patch and assume potential compromise until mitigations are verified.
Risk score, explained
The CVSS 3.1 score of 7.5 reflects a High-severity vulnerability with significant real-world impact. The score is driven by: (1) Network accessibility (AV:N) — no local access required; (2) Low attack complexity (AC:L) — straightforward exploitation once signature is obtained; (3) No privilege requirement (PR:N); (4) No user interaction required (UI:N); (5) Uniform scope (S:U); and (6) High confidentiality impact (C:H) — full access to device relay credentials. The integrity and availability components do not amplify the score in the base metric, but in practice, an attacker with relay credentials can also disrupt or modify communications, which is a business-critical concern.
Frequently asked questions
Can this vulnerability be exploited without network access to the Naxclow platform API?
No. The vulnerability requires the attacker to send a crafted request to the Naxclow platform API endpoint. However, 'network access' means the API must be reachable—it could be on the internet, on a corporate network, or on a segmented IoT network depending on your deployment. If your API is not internet-exposed, the risk is lower but not zero if internal attackers or compromised internal systems can reach it.
What is a 'platform-valid request signature' and how would an attacker obtain one?
Naxclow uses request signatures to validate API calls. A platform-valid signature is one that passes the platform's cryptographic verification. Attackers could obtain one by: intercepting legitimate requests, stealing shared secrets or keys, exploiting weak signature generation logic, or social engineering. The advisory does not detail the signature mechanism; check Naxclow's documentation and your own deployment logs to understand what secrets are in use.
If I patch the vulnerability, am I protected from past exploitation?
Patching prevents future exploitation but does not automatically detect or undo past compromises. After patching, conduct a forensic audit of relay registrations, credential request logs, and device traffic for signs of unauthorized access during the exposure window. Rotate relay credentials and re-authenticate all device relay connections.
Do I need to isolate affected devices immediately?
Not necessarily, but you should implement enhanced monitoring on devices that may have had their relay credentials compromised. If you detect evidence of unauthorized relay registration or traffic interception, isolate affected devices pending investigation. Prioritize patching and credential rotation over immediate isolation if your operational tempo allows.
This analysis is based on the CVE record and publicly available information as of the publication date. Naxclow is responsible for releasing official patches and detailed guidance. Organizations should verify all statements against vendor advisories and their own environments. No warranty is made regarding the completeness or accuracy of this summary. Always test security patches in non-production environments before deployment. SEC.co assumes no liability for actions taken based on this analysis. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-07-20. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).
Weaknesses (CWE)
Related vulnerabilities
- CVE-2018-25391HIGHHaPe PKH 1.1 Authorization Bypass – Unauthorized Record Deletion Vulnerability
- CVE-2025-26418HIGHAndroid CarDevicePolicyService Privilege Escalation (CVSS 7.8)
- CVE-2025-53345HIGHThimPress Thim Core Missing Authorization Leads to Code Execution
- CVE-2026-0133HIGHAndroid ARM SMMU v3 Privilege Escalation (CVSS 7.8)
- CVE-2026-0272HIGHPalo Alto PAN-OS Privilege Escalation Vulnerability (PA-Series, VM-Series, Panorama)
- CVE-2026-10737HIGHWordPress SP Project & Document Manager Unauthenticated File Access Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-26236HIGHQuMagie Missing Authorization Vulnerability – Patch to 2.9.0
- CVE-2026-26237HIGHQuMagie Missing Authorization Vulnerability – HIGH Severity Data Exposure