HIGH 8.1

CVE-2026-49948: Mem0 Missing Authorization in /configure Endpoint (CVSS 8.1)

Mem0 through version 0.2.8 has a privilege escalation vulnerability in its self-hosted server. Any user with an API key can reconfigure the global AI model and embedding providers to point to an attacker-controlled server. The attacker doesn't need elevated permissions—just normal API access. The malicious configuration persists in the database and survives restarts, affecting all users on that Mem0 instance. This allows the attacker to intercept, log, or manipulate all LLM requests and responses.

Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain

CVSS
3.1 · 8.1 HIGH · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Weaknesses (CWE)
CWE-862
Affected products
0 configuration(s)
Published / Modified
2026-06-09 / 2026-07-14

NVD description (verbatim)

Mem0 versions through 0.2.8, fixed in commit ae7f406, contain a missing authorization vulnerability in the self-hosted server component where the POST /configure endpoint modifies global LLM provider and embedder configuration but only verifies authentication via JWT or X-API-Key without validating the caller's role. Any authenticated user holding a distributed API key can redirect all LLM and embedder traffic to an attacker-controlled server, with the malicious configuration persisted to PostgreSQL and surviving server restarts to affect all users and API keys on the instance.

5 reference(s) · View on NVD →

SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source

Technical summary

The vulnerability resides in the POST /configure endpoint of Mem0's self-hosted server component. While the endpoint correctly enforces JWT or X-API-Key authentication, it omits role-based access control (RBAC) checks. An authenticated user can POST configuration changes that override the global LLM provider and embedder settings in the PostgreSQL backend without authorization verification. Because configuration is persisted to the database rather than stored in memory, the malicious settings survive server restarts and compromise all downstream API keys and users relying on that instance. The flaw is classified as CWE-862: Missing Authorization.

Business impact

For organizations deploying Mem0 self-hosted, this vulnerability enables a lateral privilege escalation from unprivileged user to infrastructure-level attacker. A disgruntled employee, contractor, or compromised low-privilege API key holder can redirect all LLM traffic through their own server, enabling data exfiltration of prompts, responses, and conversation history. In regulated environments (finance, healthcare, legal), this poses severe confidentiality and compliance risks. The persistence of malicious configuration means the attack can operate silently across the entire deployment until detected.

Affected systems

Mem0 versions through 0.2.8 are affected. The vulnerability applies only to self-hosted deployments using the server component; cloud-managed Mem0 instances are outside the scope. The fix is available in commit ae7f406 forward. Organizations should verify their deployed version and consult the Mem0 advisory for patched release versions.

Exploitability

Exploitability is moderate to high. The attack requires valid API credentials (low barrier in many organizations) and network access to the Mem0 server endpoint, but no elevated privileges, no social engineering, and no user interaction. An attacker can reconfigure the service in a single authenticated POST request. The only friction is obtaining or crafting a legitimate API key or JWT token, which may be straightforward in environments with permissive key distribution or API access patterns.

Remediation

Upgrade Mem0 to a patched version released after commit ae7f406. Verify the specific patched release version against the Mem0 project advisories. As an interim measure, restrict network access to the /configure endpoint using firewalls or API gateway rules so that only trusted administrators can reach it, and enforce strict API key rotation and least-privilege assignment policies to minimize the number of accounts capable of lateral attacks.

Patch guidance

The vulnerability is fixed in commit ae7f406 of the Mem0 repository. Review the Mem0 release notes and security advisories to identify the first patched release version, then test and deploy in your environment. Given the critical nature (database persistence, multi-user impact), prioritize patching production instances within your standard change management window. Post-patch, audit PostgreSQL logs and the configuration history (if available) to detect whether the endpoint was exploited before the fix.

Detection guidance

Monitor POST requests to the /configure endpoint for suspicious patterns: requests from unexpected source IPs, requests from non-administrative API keys, or requests originating outside normal deployment windows. Log all configuration changes with timestamps and the authenticating user/API key. Query PostgreSQL for unexpected changes to LLM provider or embedder URLs; if they point to unfamiliar or external hosts, investigate immediately. Consider implementing SIEM rules to alert on multiple rapid configuration changes or configuration changes followed by data access patterns.

Why prioritize this

This vulnerability rates as HIGH (CVSS 8.1) because it enables high-impact confidentiality and integrity violations—exfiltration of sensitive LLM prompts and responses—with only low-privilege authentication required and no user interaction. The persistence of malicious configuration across restarts amplifies the damage window. Organizations with multi-user Mem0 deployments handling sensitive data (customer conversations, internal analytics, proprietary model interactions) should patch immediately; single-user or isolated deployments can follow standard maintenance schedules.

Risk score, explained

CVSS 3.1 score of 8.1 (HIGH) reflects: attack vector network (AV:N), low attack complexity (AC:L), requires low privilege (PR:L), no user interaction (UI:N), unchanged scope (S:U), high confidentiality impact (C:H—prompts and responses are exposed), high integrity impact (I:H—configuration is modified maliciously), and no availability impact (A:N—the service remains operational). The score correctly captures that an authenticated insider or low-privilege account can cause significant confidentiality and integrity harm.

Frequently asked questions

Does this affect Mem0 cloud-hosted deployments?

No. This vulnerability applies only to self-hosted Mem0 server deployments. Cloud-managed Mem0 instances are outside the scope because Mem0's managed service controls infrastructure access and configuration. However, organizations using Mem0 SDKs or integrations with self-hosted backends should verify their deployment topology.

What exactly can an attacker do with this vulnerability?

An attacker with valid API credentials can change the global LLM provider and embedder configuration to point to their own server. This allows them to intercept, log, and potentially modify all LLM requests and responses sent by any user on that Mem0 instance. The attacker gains visibility into sensitive prompts and conversation history.

How do I know if we were compromised before patching?

Check your PostgreSQL configuration tables for unexpected LLM provider URLs or embedder endpoints that don't match your expected infrastructure. Review access logs for the /configure endpoint to identify which API keys made requests. If you find suspicious activity, assume prompts and responses were exposed during that period and consider it a data breach requiring notification and investigation.

Can I use a workaround instead of upgrading immediately?

As an interim measure, you can restrict network access to the /configure endpoint via firewall or API gateway, allowing only trusted administrator IP addresses or roles. Enforce strict API key rotation and implement least-privilege API access policies. However, this is not a substitute for patching; it only delays exploitation. Plan patching as soon as feasible.

This analysis is for informational purposes and reflects the CVE details as published. Security teams should verify Mem0 vendor advisories and release notes for exact patched version numbers and compatibility information. No exploit code or weaponized proof-of-concept is provided. Organizations should conduct their own risk assessment based on deployment topology, data sensitivity, and user access patterns. SEC.co and its authors assume no liability for decisions made based on this intelligence. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-07-16. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).