CVE-2026-49942: Net::CIDR::Set Network Mask Validation Bypass (CVSS 7.3)
Net::CIDR::Set, a Perl library for managing CIDR network blocks, contains a validation flaw in versions through 0.20 that allows attackers to bypass network access controls. The vulnerability stems from improper handling of network masks—the library accepts Unicode digit characters (such as Arabic-Indic numerals) and non-digit characters in mask fields, treating them as valid input. Additionally, leading zeros in masks are processed as decimal rather than octal, creating confusion about which networks are actually permitted. Together, these issues can cause the library to accept significantly larger or differently scoped networks than intended, potentially allowing unauthorized traffic or connections that should have been blocked.
Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain
- CVSS
- 3.1 · 7.3 HIGH · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
- Weaknesses (CWE)
- CWE-1289
- Affected products
- 1 configuration(s)
- Published / Modified
- 2026-06-04 / 2026-06-17
NVD description (verbatim)
Net::CIDR::Set versions through 0.20 for Perl did not validate network masks. The mask portion of a network mask could contain Unicode digits such as the Arabic-Indic One (U+0661), or non-digits, which were ignored. This could allow network masks to accept larger networks. Leading zeros were also accepted, but treated as decimal instead of octal. This could lead to confusion about what networks are acceptable.
3 reference(s) · View on NVD →
SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source
Technical summary
The vulnerability resides in Net::CIDR::Set's network mask parsing logic. When validating CIDR notation (e.g., 192.168.1.0/24), the library fails to strictly validate the mask portion. The parser accepts Unicode digit characters—including Arabic-Indic digits (U+0661 and similar)—which are silently ignored or misinterpreted. Non-digit characters in the mask field are also not rejected. Furthermore, leading zeros in the numeric portion are interpreted as decimal (base-10) rather than octal (base-8), deviating from expected network configuration semantics. This combination allows an attacker to craft CIDR specifications that pass validation but represent broader or unintended network ranges, effectively expanding the scope of permitted or denied traffic beyond what administrators configured.
Business impact
Organizations using Net::CIDR::Set for network access control decisions—such as IP allow/blocklists, firewall rule generators, or API gateway configurations—face the risk of security policy bypass. An attacker could craft specially formatted CIDR blocks that are accepted by the library but represent unintended network ranges, potentially granting access to systems or resources that should be restricted. The impact varies by deployment: libraries relying on Net::CIDR::Set for authorization logic could fail to correctly enforce network-based access restrictions, leading to confidentiality, integrity, and availability risks.
Affected systems
Net::CIDR::Set through version 0.20 is affected. Any Perl application or module that depends on Net::CIDR::Set for network validation, firewall configuration, access control, or CIDR block manipulation is at risk. This includes custom applications, configuration management tools, and infrastructure automation scripts that use this library to enforce network policies.
Exploitability
Exploitation requires no authentication and no user interaction. An attacker only needs to supply specially crafted CIDR notation—using Unicode digits or leading zeros—to a system or application that accepts network specifications and processes them through Net::CIDR::Set. The attack surface depends on how exposed the network configuration interface is; if an application accepts user-supplied CIDR blocks or allows remote configuration, the risk is elevated. The CVSS score of 7.3 (HIGH) reflects the network-accessible, low-complexity nature of exploitation and the combined impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
Remediation
Upgrade Net::CIDR::Set to a patched version that implements strict validation of network masks. Verify against the vendor advisory for the specific version number that resolves this issue. Until patching is possible, audit all CIDR specifications in use and manually verify they conform to standard dotted-decimal notation (e.g., 192.168.1.0/24 with only ASCII digits and appropriate octal/decimal handling). Consider restricting the input sources for network specifications to trusted administrators only.
Patch guidance
Contact the Net::CIDR::Set maintainers or check the official Perl CPAN repository for a patched release. Verify against the vendor advisory for the minimum version that includes the mask validation fix. Once a patch is available, test it in a non-production environment to ensure existing CIDR configurations are correctly re-interpreted under the stricter validation rules. Update all dependent applications and modules systematically to avoid configuration drift.
Detection guidance
Monitor applications and configuration systems that use Net::CIDR::Set for unusual CIDR specifications, particularly those containing non-ASCII characters or unexpected leading zeros. Review logs of network policy updates or access control modifications for entries that may have been injected using Unicode or malformed masks. Audit current CIDR block configurations to identify any that use non-standard notation; these may indicate attempted or successful exploitation. If source code is available, scan for calls to Net::CIDR::Set functions with untrusted input.
Why prioritize this
This vulnerability merits rapid prioritization because it directly undermines network access control mechanisms that organizations rely on for security. The ability to bypass firewall rules, IP blocklists, or access policies through crafted input is a high-impact security flaw. The low complexity of exploitation and lack of authentication requirements increase urgency. Organizations should prioritize patching and validating their configurations within one to two weeks, especially those using Net::CIDR::Set for critical access control decisions.
Risk score, explained
The CVSS 7.3 (HIGH) score reflects: (1) Network-accessible attack vector with no authentication or user interaction required; (2) Low attack complexity—an attacker simply supplies malformed CIDR notation; (3) Impact across confidentiality (access to restricted resources), integrity (unintended network policy modifications), and availability (potential denial or disruption). The vulnerability is not rated critical because it requires the affected library to be in the data path of a security decision, and impact depends on how strictly the host application relies on the library's output.
Frequently asked questions
How would an attacker use Unicode digits to bypass our network policies?
An attacker could supply a CIDR block using Unicode digits (e.g., Arabic-Indic numerals) in the mask portion instead of standard ASCII digits. If your application accepts this and passes it to Net::CIDR::Set, the library would mishandle the mask, potentially accepting a broader network range than intended. For example, a carefully crafted specification might be intended to cover 10.0.0.0/8, but the parsing flaw causes it to be interpreted differently, allowing unintended access.
Does this vulnerability require network access to exploit?
Yes, exploitation requires network access—an attacker must be able to supply CIDR specifications to a system using Net::CIDR::Set. However, no authentication is required, and the attack is straightforward to execute, making it relatively accessible to attackers if the input interface is exposed (e.g., API endpoints, web forms, or configuration files that accept remote submissions).
How do we know if we're affected?
Search your codebase for dependencies on Net::CIDR::Set using your package manager (e.g., `cpanm show` or Perl module listing tools). Check the version currently installed or specified in your requirements files. If you have version 0.20 or earlier, you are affected. Additionally, audit any applications or scripts that process CIDR blocks from user input or remote sources.
What should we do while waiting for a patch?
Immediately audit all CIDR specifications currently in use to ensure they use only ASCII digits and standard notation. Restrict who can submit or modify CIDR-based network policies to trusted administrators only. Consider implementing a secondary validation layer that checks CIDR blocks against a whitelist of expected networks. Monitor for configuration changes and unusual network policy modifications. Plan patching as a high-priority item and test the updated library thoroughly before deploying to production.
This analysis is provided for informational purposes and should be verified against official vendor advisories and security bulletins. Patch version numbers and specific remediation steps must be confirmed with the Net::CIDR::Set maintainers and your software vendor. Organizations should conduct their own risk assessment based on their specific deployment and usage of affected components. SEC.co makes no warranty regarding the completeness or accuracy of this information; always consult authoritative sources and conduct thorough testing before applying patches or configuration changes. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-07-07. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).
Related vulnerabilities
- CVE-2026-49940MEDIUMNet::CIDR::Set Unicode Digit Parsing Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-47674MEDIUMHono IP-Restriction Middleware IPv6 Bypass Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-49941HIGHNet::CIDR::Set Infinite Recursion Denial of Service
- CVE-2018-25382HIGHZechat 1.5 SQL Injection Vulnerability – Unauthenticated Database Access
- CVE-2018-25383HIGHFree MP3 CD Ripper 2.8 Stack Overflow – ROP and DEP Bypass Risk
- CVE-2018-25385HIGHUnauthenticated SQL Injection in E-Registrasi Pencak Silat 18.10
- CVE-2018-25386HIGHSQL Injection in HaPe PKH 1.1 Admin Interface
- CVE-2018-25388HIGHHaPe PKH 1.1 Arbitrary File Upload Vulnerability (CVSS 8.8)