HIGH 7.8

CVE-2026-48583: Windows Kernel Use-After-Free Privilege Escalation (CVSS 7.8)

A use-after-free vulnerability exists in the Windows Kernel that allows an attacker with local access and standard user privileges to escalate their access to system-level permissions. The flaw stems from improper memory management in kernel code, where memory is freed but then accessed again, potentially enabling arbitrary code execution at the highest privilege level.

Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain

CVSS
3.1 · 7.8 HIGH · CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Weaknesses (CWE)
CWE-416
Affected products
22 configuration(s)
Published / Modified
2026-06-09 / 2026-06-17

NVD description (verbatim)

Use after free in Windows Kernel allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.

1 reference(s) · View on NVD →

SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source

Technical summary

This vulnerability (CWE-416: Use After Free) resides in Windows Kernel memory management. An authorized local attacker with user-level privileges can trigger a code path that accesses kernel memory after it has been deallocated. The CVSS 3.1 score of 7.8 reflects the local attack vector, low complexity, and high impact across confidentiality, integrity, and availability. Successful exploitation grants SYSTEM-level code execution, making this a classic privilege escalation pathway that does not require user interaction.

Business impact

Privilege escalation vulnerabilities of this severity create a direct path for attackers to move from compromised user accounts—obtained via phishing, weak credentials, or lateral movement—to complete system control. Once elevated, an attacker can install persistent malware, access sensitive data, manipulate system configurations, and potentially pivot to other systems on the network. For organizations relying on Windows workstations and servers for business operations, this significantly amplifies the blast radius of any initial compromise.

Affected systems

The vulnerability impacts multiple Windows editions spanning client and server platforms: Windows 10 (versions 1607, 1809, 21H2, 22H2), Windows 11 (versions 23H2, 24H2, 25H2, 26H1), Windows Server 2016, 2019, 2022, and 2025. This breadth of affected versions underscores the need for systematic patching across diverse Windows deployments. Organizations running any of these versions should assume exposure and prioritize assessment.

Exploitability

While not currently tracked in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog, the low attack complexity and high prevalence of Windows systems make this vulnerability attractive to threat actors. Local privilege escalation flaws are frequently weaponized in multi-stage attacks where initial access is already obtained. The requirement for local access and existing user-level privileges limits immediate attack surface in purely air-gapped environments, but compromised endpoints or insider threats pose real risk. Public exploit development is likely inevitable.

Remediation

Microsoft has released security updates addressing this vulnerability across all affected Windows editions and server versions. Organizations should obtain and deploy the relevant patches from Microsoft's June 2026 security bulletin immediately. Patch deployment priority should align with business criticality: servers first, followed by user workstations, particularly those handling sensitive data or serving critical functions. Pre-patching, validate compatibility in test environments to prevent operational disruption.

Patch guidance

Consult the Microsoft Security Update Guide and associated KB articles published in June 2026 for patch version numbers and deployment details specific to your Windows edition and server version. Verify patch applicability against your inventory before rolling out. For Server products (2016, 2019, 2022, 2025), prioritize patches immediately following change management procedures. For Windows 10 and 11 workstations, plan deployment within 30 days of patch release unless organizational policy mandates faster timelines. Ensure update services or WSUS configurations are synchronized to deliver patches reliably.

Detection guidance

Monitor for abnormal kernel-mode memory access patterns or privilege escalation events on systems running affected Windows versions. Detection strategies include: (1) Monitoring for unexpected transition from user-mode to kernel-mode code execution, (2) Auditing use-after-free indicators in crash dumps or kernel logs (look for memory references post-deallocation), (3) Correlating failed and successful privilege escalation attempts in Security Event Log (events 4688, 4689 for process creation). Organizations using EDR platforms should implement detections for unsigned kernel drivers or anomalous system call sequences preceding privilege escalation. Behavioral detection of SYSTEM-level process creation from user-context processes is a strong secondary indicator.

Why prioritize this

This vulnerability merits immediate remediation due to its HIGH CVSS score (7.8), broad platform impact spanning widely deployed Windows versions, and its role as a potential privilege escalation bridge in multi-stage attacks. The combination of low attack complexity and high integrity/confidentiality/availability impact makes it a natural target for threat actors seeking to amplify initial compromises. Organizations should treat it with equivalent priority to critical remote code execution flaws affecting the same platforms.

Risk score, explained

The CVSS 3.1 score of 7.8 reflects: (1) Local Attack Vector—attacker must have local system access, reducing immediate risk in network-isolated scenarios but increasing risk for remote work and hybrid environments; (2) Low Attack Complexity—no special conditions or social engineering required to trigger; (3) Low Privileges Required—standard user-level access suffices; (4) No User Interaction—exploitation is automated once triggered; (5) High Impact across Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability—successful exploitation grants unrestricted system-level control. The score appropriately signals urgency while acknowledging that local prerequisites limit risk compared to network-based critical flaws.

Frequently asked questions

Does this vulnerability require admin access to exploit?

No. The vulnerability can be exploited by an attacker with standard user-level privileges. An admin account is not necessary, though local system access is required. This makes it particularly dangerous in scenarios involving compromised user accounts or trusted insiders.

Is there an active exploit in the wild?

As of the vulnerability's publication, it is not listed in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. However, use-after-free flaws in widely deployed systems like Windows typically attract public exploit development within weeks. Organizations should not rely on exploit unavailability and should patch promptly.

Do I need to patch all Windows versions, or can I skip older ones like Windows 10 1607?

Microsoft has released patches for all listed affected versions, including older builds. Even end-of-support or extended-support versions are patched. You should apply patches to all systems in your environment running the affected versions, prioritizing business-critical systems first.

Can this vulnerability be exploited remotely, or only locally?

This is a local attack only—the attacker must have existing access to the system. It is not a remote code execution vulnerability. However, it is frequently chained with remote vulnerabilities or credential compromise to establish the local foothold required for exploitation.

This analysis is based on vendor advisory data and CVSS metrics current as of the publication date. Patch version numbers and specific KB articles should be verified against the official Microsoft Security Update Guide. This vulnerability requires local system access and does not enable remote code execution by itself. Organizations should conduct testing in non-production environments before deploying patches. SEC.co makes no warranty regarding exploit availability, real-world attack prevalence, or remediation timelines for specific customer environments. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-07-18. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).