CVE-2026-48297: Adobe Experience Manager Stored XSS in Form Fields
Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability that allows low-privileged users to embed malicious scripts into form fields. When legitimate users view pages containing these compromised fields, the injected JavaScript executes in their browsers, potentially compromising their sessions or enabling further attacks. The vulnerability affects AEM versions 6.5.24, LTS SP1, 2026.04 and earlier.
Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain
- CVSS
- 3.1 · 5.4 MEDIUM · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
- Weaknesses (CWE)
- CWE-79
- Affected products
- 4 configuration(s)
- Published / Modified
- 2026-06-09 / 2026-06-17
NVD description (verbatim)
Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.24, LTS SP1, 2026.04 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim's browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. Scope is changed.
1 reference(s) · View on NVD →
SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source
Technical summary
This stored XSS vulnerability (CWE-79) exists in Adobe Experience Manager's form handling mechanisms. An authenticated attacker with low privilege levels can inject malicious JavaScript into specific form fields during creation or modification. The payload persists in the system and executes when any user—including those with higher privileges—accesses the affected page. The vulnerability's scope change indicates that impact extends beyond the vulnerable component itself, potentially affecting other assets in the application context. The attack surface is network-accessible and requires no special conditions beyond low-level authentication and user interaction (UI interaction on the victim's part).
Business impact
Compromised AEM instances create multiple business risks: attackers can steal session tokens or credentials from administrative users who browse affected pages, modify form content to redirect users to phishing sites, or inject cryptominers into customer-facing forms. For organizations using AEM for customer engagement or marketing automation, this represents a pathway to customer data exposure and brand damage. The ability for low-privileged users (such as content contributors) to weaponize forms means insider threat scenarios are viable. Remediation timelines should account for inventory of custom forms and potential historical data exposure.
Affected systems
Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.24, LTS SP1, 2026.04 and earlier are affected. Organizations running any of these versions—whether on-premises or cloud-hosted—require assessment. Custom extensions or integrations that rely on affected form components may amplify exposure. The vulnerability is version-specific but potentially widespread across deployments given AEM's use in enterprise content management and digital marketing stacks.
Exploitability
Exploitability is moderate. The attack requires valid authentication (low-privileged credentials), limiting the threat actor pool to employees, contractors, or compromised internal accounts. However, once injected, the payload affects all subsequent page visitors without additional attacker interaction. No CVSS exploit or proof-of-concept has been officially disclosed or added to known exploit databases. The barrier to exploitation is primarily access to AEM's form creation interface rather than technical sophistication. Organizations with lax access controls or shared service accounts face elevated risk.
Remediation
Apply the latest Adobe security patches for your AEM version tier. Verify patch availability from Adobe Security Advisories specific to your installed version (6.5.x, LTS SP1, or 2026.x streams). Interim controls include: restricting form creation/modification privileges to trusted administrative roles, implementing a Web Application Firewall to sanitize stored values on output, and conducting an audit of existing form fields for suspicious JavaScript patterns. Review access logs for unauthorized form field modifications during the interim period.
Patch guidance
Consult Adobe's official security advisory for your specific AEM version and installation type (on-premises vs. Cloud Service). Adobe typically releases patches through their standard update channels. Organizations should verify patch availability before upgrading, as patch versions vary by release stream. Test patches in a non-production environment to ensure compatibility with custom extensions. Consider coordinating patching schedules with other Adobe product updates to minimize maintenance windows.
Detection guidance
Search form field values and configuration databases for common XSS payloads (e.g., <script>, onerror=, onload=, javascript:). Monitor AEM's form component access logs for modification activity from unexpected user accounts, particularly during off-hours. Review page rendering logs for JavaScript execution from stored field values. Implement output encoding validation rules to catch unescaped HTML in form storage. Web application firewalls and SIEM rules can flag requests containing script-like content in form submission parameters.
Why prioritize this
Although the CVSS score is medium (5.4), this vulnerability warrants near-term attention. Stored XSS affecting authenticated users creates persistent, multi-victim impact vectors. AEM's use in enterprise environments means compromised deployments can serve malicious content to executives, customers, or partners. The low barrier to exploitation (low-privileged account access) combined with high visibility (form-based content) makes it a plausible insider threat scenario. Prioritize patching instances with public-facing forms or those handling sensitive customer interactions.
Risk score, explained
The CVSS 3.1 score of 5.4 reflects: network accessibility (AV:N), low attack complexity (AC:L), required low-level authentication (PR:L), user interaction needed for impact (UI:R), and changed scope extending beyond the vulnerable component (S:C). Confidentiality and integrity impact are rated low (C:L, I:L) because the script executes in victim browsers rather than directly exposing backend data. Availability is not impacted (A:N). The medium severity appropriately captures the broad but not critical nature of stored XSS in an enterprise application. Risk may escalate in environments with weak access controls or public-facing forms.
Frequently asked questions
Can an unauthenticated user exploit this vulnerability?
No. The CVE explicitly requires a low-privileged authenticated account. Attackers must have valid AEM credentials—typically employees, contractors, or accounts obtained through phishing or credential compromise. This requirement significantly limits the threat pool but does not eliminate risk, especially in organizations with overly permissive access controls.
If we patch AEM, will existing malicious scripts in forms be removed automatically?
Patching closes the injection vector but does not automatically sanitize historical form field data. After applying patches, conduct a forensic review of form fields created or modified by potentially compromised accounts. Remove any suspicious scripts manually or use bulk data cleanup tools if available. Verify output encoding is active to prevent stored payloads from executing even if they remain in the database.
How can we identify if our AEM instance has been exploited by this vulnerability?
Review form modification audit logs for suspicious user activity, particularly from low-privileged accounts. Search form component databases for encoded or obfuscated script patterns. Monitor web server logs for unusual JavaScript execution during page renders. Check browser developer tools in AEM authoring environments for unexpected console errors or network requests. If you discover suspicious forms, preserve them for forensic analysis before deletion.
Does this vulnerability affect AEM Cloud Service differently than on-premises deployments?
The vulnerability affects both deployment models, but AEM Cloud Service may receive patches faster through Adobe's managed update schedule. On-premises deployments require manual patching coordination. Cloud Service customers should verify patch status through their Adobe console; on-premises teams must proactively check advisory announcements and apply patches within their own change windows.
This analysis is provided for informational purposes and reflects the CVE description and CVSS metrics as of the publication date. Patch availability and version numbers should be verified directly against Adobe's official security advisories before implementation. Organizations should conduct their own risk assessments based on deployment context, access controls, and exposure to customer-facing forms. SEC.co does not provide warranties regarding patch completeness or compatibility. Consult with Adobe support or qualified security professionals for deployment-specific guidance. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-07-16. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).
Related vulnerabilities
- CVE-2026-34692MEDIUMAdobe Experience Manager DOM-Based XSS Vulnerability Analysis
- CVE-2026-47935MEDIUMAdobe Experience Manager DOM-based XSS Vulnerability (CVSS 5.4)
- CVE-2026-47936MEDIUMAdobe Experience Manager Stored XSS
- CVE-2026-47939MEDIUMAdobe Experience Manager Stored XSS Vulnerability – Patch Guidance
- CVE-2026-47941MEDIUMStored XSS in Adobe Experience Manager—CVSS 5.4 Medium
- CVE-2026-47942MEDIUMAdobe Experience Manager Stored XSS Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-47943MEDIUMAdobe Experience Manager Stored XSS Vulnerability (CVSS 5.4)
- CVE-2026-47944MEDIUMAdobe Experience Manager Stored XSS Vulnerability – CVSS 5.4