MEDIUM 5.4

CVE-2026-48192: Mendix Studio Pro Project File Validation Vulnerability – Code Execution Risk

Mendix Studio Pro contains a vulnerability in how it processes project files during the build process. An attacker could craft a malicious project file that, when opened and built by a developer on their local machine, executes arbitrary code with the permissions of that user. This requires social engineering to trick a developer into opening the malicious project, but once opened, the code execution happens automatically during the build pipeline without additional user interaction.

Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain

CVSS
3.1 · 5.4 MEDIUM · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:N
Weaknesses (CWE)
CWE-94
Affected products
0 configuration(s)
Published / Modified
2026-06-30 / 2026-07-02

NVD description (verbatim)

A vulnerability has been identified in Mendix Studio Pro 10.11 (All versions), Mendix Studio Pro 10.12 (All versions), Mendix Studio Pro 10.13 (All versions), Mendix Studio Pro 10.14 (All versions), Mendix Studio Pro 10.15 (All versions), Mendix Studio Pro 10.16 (All versions), Mendix Studio Pro 10.17 (All versions), Mendix Studio Pro 10.18 (All versions), Mendix Studio Pro 10.19 (All versions), Mendix Studio Pro 10.20 (All versions), Mendix Studio Pro 10.21 (All versions), Mendix Studio Pro 10.22 (All versions), Mendix Studio Pro 10.23 (All versions), Mendix Studio Pro 10.24 (All versions < V10.24.21), Mendix Studio Pro 11.0 (All versions), Mendix Studio Pro 11.1 (All versions), Mendix Studio Pro 11.10 (All versions), Mendix Studio Pro 11.11 (All versions), Mendix Studio Pro 11.2 (All versions), Mendix Studio Pro 11.3 (All versions), Mendix Studio Pro 11.4 (All versions), Mendix Studio Pro 11.5 (All versions), Mendix Studio Pro 11.6 (All versions < V11.6.7), Mendix Studio Pro 11.7 (All versions), Mendix Studio Pro 11.8 (All versions), Mendix Studio Pro 11.9 (All versions). Affected versions of Mendix Studio Pro do not properly validate or sanitize project files processed during the build pipeline. This could allow an attacker who tricks a user into opening and running a specially crafted malicious project locally on their system to execute arbitrary code in the context of that user.

1 reference(s) · View on NVD →

SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source

Technical summary

The vulnerability stems from insufficient validation and sanitization of project files in the Mendix Studio Pro build pipeline. The affected versions fail to properly inspect or neutralize potentially malicious content within project structures before processing them. By exploiting improper deserialization or file parsing logic, an attacker can embed code that executes during the build phase. The attack vector is network-adjacent (the malicious project can be distributed remotely), requires elevated privileges to initiate the build, and depends on user interaction to open the project—but once those conditions are met, the code execution occurs in the security context of the developer's system.

Business impact

Organizations using affected Mendix Studio Pro versions face risk of developer workstation compromise. A malicious project introduced through supply chain vectors, shared repositories, or social engineering could give attackers code execution on machines with access to source repositories, build systems, and potentially production deployment credentials. This could lead to intellectual property theft, backdoors in deployed applications, or lateral movement to connected infrastructure. Development teams are often high-value targets due to their system access and trust within organizations.

Affected systems

The vulnerability affects all versions of Mendix Studio Pro 10.11 through 10.23, all versions of 11.0 through 11.5 and 11.7 through 11.9, with partial affects in versions 10.24 (prior to V10.24.21) and 11.6 (prior to V11.6.7). Organizations running any Mendix Studio Pro instance in these ranges should immediately assess whether they are at risk.

Exploitability

Exploitation requires social engineering to convince a developer to open a malicious project and then execute a build operation. While the barrier to exploitation is moderate due to the user-interaction requirement, the outcome is severe: arbitrary code execution on the developer's machine. No CVSS escalation points are awarded for this being actively exploited in the wild at this time, but the attack chain is straightforward once the malicious project is in hand. The human element (tricking a developer) is the primary defense; technical mitigations are not readily available without patching.

Remediation

Mendix has released patched versions to address this vulnerability. Organizations should upgrade to Mendix Studio Pro V10.24.21 or later for the 10.24 line, and V11.6.7 or later for the 11.6 line. All other affected major versions (10.11–10.23, 11.0–11.5, 11.7–11.9) should be upgraded to the next available stable release beyond their current major version or to a fixed version within that release series. Verify against the official Mendix security advisory for the complete remediation path specific to your deployment.

Patch guidance

Prioritize patching development environments first, as they are the attack surface for this vulnerability. Mendix Studio Pro updates should be deployed through your standard patch management process. V10.24.21 and V11.6.7 are the minimum secure versions for those branches; verify availability and compatibility in your Mendix release notes before deployment. Organizations on older major versions (10.11–10.23) should plan a phased upgrade strategy, testing each major version bump in a non-production environment first. No workarounds are available; patching is the required remediation.

Detection guidance

Monitor for suspicious project file creation or modification in version control systems, particularly those containing unexpected binary blobs or scripts embedded in project metadata. Alert on project builds initiated by unusual users or from unexpected network locations. Review build logs for errors or unusual execution patterns that might indicate malicious code injection. If your organization uses centralized project repositories, implement code review requirements for all project file changes, particularly those affecting build configuration or metadata. Endpoint detection tools should flag unusual child processes spawned from Mendix Studio Pro or its build pipeline components.

Why prioritize this

While CVSS scores this as Medium (5.4), the risk to development environments warrants high prioritization. Developers have elevated access to repositories, build systems, and often production credentials. Compromise of a single developer machine can cascade into supply chain attacks affecting customers and downstream deployments. The vulnerability requires user interaction but is otherwise trivial to exploit once the social engineering succeeds. Organizations should treat this as a critical priority for development team deployments.

Risk score, explained

The CVSS 3.1 score of 5.4 (MEDIUM) reflects the requirement for both high-privilege user action and user interaction to trigger exploitation. However, the severity is tempered by the attack vector requiring network-adjacent positioning and the attacker needing to first social-engineer a developer. The impact is limited to integrity (code execution) without confidentiality or availability loss in the CVSS model, though actual compromise scenarios could extend beyond this. For development teams, the contextual risk is higher than the numerical score suggests due to the sensitive nature of developer workstations.

Frequently asked questions

Can this vulnerability affect our production Mendix runtime applications?

No. This vulnerability is specific to Mendix Studio Pro, the development and build tool. Production applications running on the Mendix Runtime are not directly affected. However, if a developer's workstation is compromised through this vulnerability, the attacker could potentially inject malicious code into applications during development, which could then affect production if deployed.

Do we need to patch if developers only use Mendix Cloud to build and deploy?

If your developers are using Mendix Cloud's deployment capabilities and not running local builds on their machines, the immediate risk is reduced. However, this depends on your development workflow. If developers open and build projects locally for testing before cloud deployment, you should still patch their workstations. Verify your build pipeline setup with your Mendix administrator.

What should we tell developers to watch for?

Developers should be cautious when opening Mendix projects from untrusted sources or unfamiliar colleagues, especially if they are shared via email or external file-sharing services. They should verify the legitimacy of shared projects before building them. Additionally, they should avoid downloading or opening projects from unofficial channels. If a project build produces unexpected errors or spawns unusual processes, they should report it to security immediately.

Is there a workaround if we cannot patch immediately?

There is no technical workaround for this vulnerability. The only reliable mitigation is to patch to a fixed version. In the interim, restrict project file downloads to verified internal sources, enforce code review for all project file changes, and monitor build activity closely for anomalies. However, these are detective measures, not preventive ones; patching should remain the priority.

This analysis is provided for informational purposes to support vulnerability assessment and patch planning. The information is current as of the advisory publication date and subject to change as new information emerges. Organizations should verify all technical details, patch availability, and version numbers against the official Mendix security advisory and release notes before implementing changes in production environments. This explainer does not constitute security advice tailored to your specific infrastructure; consult your security team and Mendix support for guidance on your particular deployment. No exploit code, tooling, or proof-of-concept details are provided or endorsed herein. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-08-09. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).