LOW 3.3

CVE-2026-47337: Ubuntu Linux Kernel NULL Pointer Dereference in Socket Mediation

A NULL pointer dereference flaw in Ubuntu Linux kernel versions 6.8, 6.17, and 7.0 can be triggered by any unprivileged local user to crash the kernel. The vulnerability exists in socket mediation code that handles both IPv4 and IPv6 traffic. While the flaw itself does not enable data theft or system compromise, it can be exploited to cause a denial of service by forcing a kernel panic, disrupting availability for all users on the affected system.

Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain

CVSS
3.1 · 3.3 LOW · CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Weaknesses (CWE)
CWE-476
Affected products
3 configuration(s)
Published / Modified
2026-05-28 / 2026-06-17

NVD description (verbatim)

Ubuntu Linux 6.8, 6.17 and 7.0 contain SAUCE patches with a possible NULL pointer dereference in the handling of AF_INET/AF_INET6 socket mediation. The bug can be triggered by an unprivileged local user. This can lead to a kernel oops.

1 reference(s) · View on NVD →

SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source

Technical summary

CVE-2026-47337 is a NULL pointer dereference (CWE-476) in the SAUCE patches applied to Ubuntu Linux kernel versions 6.8, 6.17, and 7.0. The defect resides in AF_INET and AF_INET6 socket mediation logic, where improper input validation or state handling allows an unprivileged local user to cause kernel oops through a crafted socket operation. The vulnerability requires local access and standard user privileges; no special configuration or authentication bypass is necessary to trigger it. Attack surface is high for multi-user systems or containers where unprivileged users exist.

Business impact

Systems running affected Ubuntu kernel versions are susceptible to kernel crashes triggered by unprivileged users. In production environments—especially containerized deployments, shared hosting, or virtual machine farms—this can result in unplanned downtime affecting multiple tenants or workloads. While not directly enabling data exfiltration or privilege escalation, the availability impact may violate SLAs and complicate incident response during periods of active exploitation. The low CVSS score reflects the lack of confidentiality or integrity impact, but business criticality depends on workload sensitivity and uptime requirements.

Affected systems

Ubuntu Linux kernel versions 6.8, 6.17, and 7.0 are affected. Systems running these specific kernel versions with local user access (including unprivileged container users) are at risk. Verify your running kernel version via 'uname -r' to confirm exposure. Desktop, server, and embedded deployments of Ubuntu using these kernels require attention.

Exploitability

Exploitability is straightforward for local attackers. The vulnerability requires only unprivileged user privileges and local code execution; no special techniques, ASLR bypass, or race conditions are documented as necessary. An attacker can craft a socket operation to trigger the NULL pointer dereference. The lack of KEV (Known Exploited Vulnerability) designation does not imply unexploited status in the wild; it reflects absence of documented exploitation by ransomware or state actors at the time of CVE publication. Community proof-of-concept or exploit code may emerge once disclosure gains visibility.

Remediation

Canonical should release kernel patches for versions 6.8, 6.17, and 7.0 addressing the socket mediation NULL pointer dereference. Updates typically ship through the standard Ubuntu security and updates channels (security.ubuntu.com). Customers must apply the patched kernel version and reboot to take effect. If patches are delayed, administrative controls—such as restricting unprivileged user shell access or running containers with stricter capabilities—can reduce attack surface, though they do not eliminate the flaw.

Patch guidance

Monitor Ubuntu security bulletins and your system update notifications. Once a patch is released by Canonical, apply it as soon as feasible within your maintenance windows, prioritizing production systems where unprivileged users or containers have network socket capabilities. Reboot is mandatory for kernel updates. Verify the patched kernel version matches Canonical's advisory to confirm successful deployment. For systems requiring high availability, consider staged rollouts to detect any regressions before full deployment.

Detection guidance

Monitor kernel logs for 'NULL pointer dereference' panics, particularly in socket/network code paths. On systems with persistent crash dumps, examine vmcore files for stack traces involving AF_INET or AF_INET6 mediation functions. Use tools like 'journalctl' (systemd systems) or 'dmesg' to capture oops messages. Correlate kernel crashes with network socket activity from unprivileged processes. Implement centralized logging of kernel panics and set up alerting on crash events to speed incident detection. Note that intentional crashes may be used for reconnaissance; investigate patterns of repeated crashes from the same user or container.

Why prioritize this

While CVSS 3.3 (LOW) correctly reflects limited confidentiality and integrity risk, this flaw merits timely patching due to trivial exploitability and its denial-of-service impact on system availability. Prioritize systems where unprivileged users or multi-tenant containers are active, as well as mission-critical servers where downtime carries high business cost. It does not warrant emergency patching but should be included in the next planned security maintenance cycle.

Risk score, explained

The CVSS 3.1 vector (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L) yields a score of 3.3 (LOW). Attack vector is local, requiring prior user access; attack complexity is low, meaning no special conditions are needed. Privileges required are low (unprivileged user); no user interaction is required; scope is unchanged; and only availability is impacted (kernel oops). The absence of confidentiality or integrity impact caps the severity, even though the attack is easy to execute. Organizations should not interpret the low score as 'ignore'; instead, treat it as 'address promptly but not emergently.'

Frequently asked questions

Can an attacker on the network exploit this remotely?

No. CVE-2026-47337 requires local access and unprivileged user privileges on the target system. It cannot be exploited via the network alone. However, if an attacker gains shell access to the system (via SSH, compromised application, etc.), they can trigger the flaw locally.

Does this vulnerability lead to privilege escalation?

No. The flaw causes a kernel oops (denial of service), not a privilege escalation. It does not grant root access or bypass security controls. An attacker's goal would be to disrupt availability, not gain elevated privileges.

Is this listed in the CISA KEV catalog?

No. CVE-2026-47337 has not been added to the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog as of the publication date. This does not mean it is unexploited; it indicates an absence of documented active exploitation by ransomware campaigns or state-sponsored actors at the time of disclosure.

What should I do if I cannot patch immediately?

Reduce user access to the affected system if operationally feasible. Restrict unprivileged shell accounts, disable unnecessary local user accounts, and enforce strict container capabilities policies. Implement kernel audit logging to detect socket-related crashes. Monitor for kernel panics and correlate with suspicious activity. Plan to patch in your next maintenance window; this is not an emergency but should not be delayed indefinitely.

This analysis is based on the CVE record and publicly available information as of the publication date. CVSS scores and severity ratings are derived from the official CVE entry. Patch availability, version numbers, and remediation timelines should be verified against Canonical's official Ubuntu security advisories and your organization's patch management system. This document does not constitute legal advice or a guarantee of security. Organizations should conduct their own risk assessment based on their environment, workload criticality, and threat landscape. No exploit code or weaponized proof-of-concept details are provided herein. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-07-07. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).