HIGH 7.5

CVE-2026-46934: Oracle E-Business Suite MRO Authorization Bypass (CVSS 7.5)

A vulnerability in Oracle's Complex Maintenance, Repair and Overhaul component of E-Business Suite allows attackers with low-level network access to gain complete control over the application. The flaw requires an attacker to already be authenticated with basic user credentials and involves HTTP-based exploitation, but once leveraged successfully, gives an adversary full read, write, and availability control over the system. Versions 12.2.3 through 12.2.15 are affected.

Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain

CVSS
3.1 · 7.5 HIGH · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Weaknesses (CWE)
CWE-269, CWE-284, CWE-306
Affected products
1 configuration(s)
Published / Modified
2026-06-17 / 2026-06-18

NVD description (verbatim)

Vulnerability in the Oracle Complex Maintenance, Repair and Overhaul product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Internal Operations). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.15. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Complex Maintenance, Repair and Overhaul. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle Complex Maintenance, Repair and Overhaul. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 7.5 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H).

1 reference(s) · View on NVD →

SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source

Technical summary

CVE-2026-46934 is a difficult-to-exploit authorization and access control weakness in the Internal Operations component of Oracle Complex Maintenance, Repair and Overhaul. The vulnerability combines improper access control mechanisms (CWE-269, CWE-284) with missing authentication or authorization checks (CWE-306), allowing a low-privileged authenticated user to escalate privileges or bypass restrictions via HTTP requests. The high CVSS 3.1 score of 7.5 reflects the requirement for prior authentication (PR:L) and high attack complexity (AC:H), which moderates severity despite complete C, I, and A impact. Network-accessible endpoints fail to enforce proper authorization checks, enabling unauthorized operations on sensitive maintenance and repair workflows.

Business impact

Compromise of the MRO (Maintenance, Repair, Overhaul) system creates operational and data integrity risks for organizations managing complex asset lifecycles. An attacker with employee-level access could alter maintenance schedules, falsify repair records, manipulate inventory, or disrupt critical workflows. For companies reliant on accurate MRO data for compliance, warranty management, or safety-critical operations, this exposure poses regulatory and liability exposure. The confidentiality impact means sensitive operational and financial data tied to asset maintenance becomes accessible to unauthorized parties.

Affected systems

Oracle E-Business Suite Complex Maintenance, Repair and Overhaul component versions 12.2.3, 12.2.4, 12.2.5, 12.2.6, 12.2.7, 12.2.8, 12.2.9, 12.2.10, 12.2.11, 12.2.12, 12.2.13, 12.2.14, and 12.2.15 are affected. Organizations running E-Business Suite with MRO module deployment should inventory their current version immediately. Patched versions and upgrade guidance should be verified against the official Oracle Security Advisory.

Exploitability

Exploitation requires an attacker to already possess valid network and application credentials as a low-privileged user—making this a post-authentication attack rather than a remote unauthenticated compromise vector. The high attack complexity (AC:H) indicates that successful exploitation depends on specific configuration, timing, or environmental conditions that are not universally present across all deployments. While the barrier to entry is higher than zero-day remote code execution scenarios, any disgruntled employee, contractor, or account compromise could trigger this flaw. The HTTP-based attack surface suggests the vulnerability may be triggerable through standard web interface interactions without specialized tools, but practical exploitation details depend on the specific authorization bypass mechanism. As this is not on the KEV catalog, evidence of active exploitation in the wild is not confirmed.

Remediation

Apply the security patch released by Oracle for CVE-2026-46934 as soon as scheduling permits. Verify patch applicability against your specific E-Business Suite version (12.2.3–12.2.15) and validate in a staging environment before production deployment. As an interim control, restrict network-level access to the MRO component to trusted internal users and systems, implement principle of least privilege for MRO user accounts, and enforce multi-factor authentication for all E-Business Suite access to reduce the likelihood that a compromised low-privilege account can reach the vulnerable code path.

Patch guidance

Contact Oracle for the official security patch covering CVE-2026-46934. Patch availability and version-specific guidance should be confirmed through the Oracle Security Advisory corresponding to this CVE. Test patches in a non-production E-Business Suite environment that mirrors your production configuration before rollout. Coordinate patching with change control processes and consider applying patches during a planned maintenance window to avoid service disruption. After patching, perform functional regression testing on MRO workflows to ensure the fix does not break legitimate maintenance and repair operations.

Detection guidance

Monitor HTTP request logs for unusual access patterns targeting E-Business Suite MRO endpoints, particularly requests originating from unexpected internal IP ranges or during off-hours. Look for low-privileged user accounts performing administrative or cross-user operations on maintenance records, inventory adjustments, or workflow modifications. Audit application logs for authorization failures or anomalous privilege escalation attempts. In post-compromise scenarios, examine MRO data change logs for unauthorized modifications to maintenance schedules, repair approvals, or cost entries. Enable detailed logging on the Internal Operations module if not already configured, and correlate suspicious activity with user access reviews.

Why prioritize this

This vulnerability merits prioritization because it affects a core enterprise asset management function and grants complete system compromise to authenticated attackers. While the requirement for valid credentials raises the bar above unauthenticated threats, the impact scope—full confidentiality, integrity, and availability compromise—combined with the operational criticality of MRO data for manufacturing, aerospace, and utility sectors makes this a material risk. Organizations with extended MRO deployments, high user populations with network access, or sensitive maintenance-dependent operations should patch urgently. The lack of KEV designation suggests active exploitation is not yet documented, which creates a window for proactive remediation before the vulnerability becomes weaponized.

Risk score, explained

The CVSS 3.1 Base Score of 7.5 (HIGH) reflects a combination of factors: network accessibility (AV:N) and complete C, I, A impact earn high numeric weight, but the requirement for low-level authentication (PR:L) and high attack complexity (AC:H) reduce the score from critical range. The score appropriately captures the fact that this is a dangerous post-authentication privilege escalation or authorization bypass rather than an unauthenticated remote code execution. In environments where MRO users are numerous, shared, or frequently compromised, the practical risk may trend toward the high end; in tightly controlled deployments with strong access governance, risk may be lower. Use CVSS as one input; business context and your operational threat model should drive final prioritization.

Frequently asked questions

Does this vulnerability allow unauthenticated remote code execution?

No. CVE-2026-46934 requires the attacker to already hold valid network credentials as a low-privileged user. It is a post-authentication authorization bypass, not an unauthenticated entry point. An attacker cannot leverage this flaw without first obtaining or compromising a legitimate user account.

Which E-Business Suite versions are safe from this vulnerability?

Versions 12.2.3 through 12.2.15 of the Complex Maintenance, Repair and Overhaul component are affected. Consult the Oracle Security Advisory for information on patched versions and any versions released after 12.2.15 that may be unaffected. Verify against official Oracle guidance rather than relying solely on this summary.

If we restrict MRO access to our internal network, are we protected?

Network segmentation and access controls reduce the practical exploit window and are a sound interim measure, but they do not eliminate the vulnerability. Any low-privileged user or compromised account with network access to the MRO component remains a vector. Patching is the definitive remediation; network controls provide defense-in-depth but should not delay patch deployment.

What should we look for to detect if this vulnerability has been exploited in our environment?

Examine MRO module audit logs and database change logs for modifications made by low-privileged user accounts that should not have authorization to make those changes. Review HTTP access logs for unusual patterns targeting MRO endpoints, and cross-reference with user activity around the same timeframes. If you suspect compromise, engage your security team or forensics provider to conduct detailed log analysis and data integrity validation on maintenance and repair records.

This analysis is based on the official CVE record and CVSS vector published by Oracle. Specific patch versions, release dates, and detailed remediation steps must be verified against the official Oracle Security Advisory before implementation. SEC.co does not host exploit code or weaponized proof-of-concept materials. Organizations should validate the applicability of this vulnerability to their specific E-Business Suite deployment, including patch levels, configuration, and operational context, before taking remediation actions. This summary is provided for informational purposes to support security decision-making and should not be considered legal advice or a substitute for vendor guidance. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-07-25. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).