CVE-2026-46894: Oracle iSupplier Portal CSRF and Open Redirect Vulnerability—Impact & Remediation
A vulnerability in Oracle's iSupplier Portal—a supplier management component of Oracle E-Business Suite—allows a low-privileged attacker to gain complete control over the portal through a specially crafted request. The flaw requires tricking a legitimate user into interacting with malicious content, but once successful, an attacker can read sensitive data, modify information, or disrupt service availability. Versions 12.2.3 through 12.2.15 are affected.
Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain
- CVSS
- 3.1 · 8.0 HIGH · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
- Weaknesses (CWE)
- CWE-352, CWE-601, CWE-640
- Affected products
- 1 configuration(s)
- Published / Modified
- 2026-06-17 / 2026-06-18
NVD description (verbatim)
Vulnerability in the Oracle iSupplier Portal product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Home Page). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.15. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTPS to compromise Oracle iSupplier Portal. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle iSupplier Portal. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.0 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H).
1 reference(s) · View on NVD →
SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source
Technical summary
CVE-2026-46894 is a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) and open redirect vulnerability in the Oracle iSupplier Portal Home Page component. The vulnerability stems from insufficient validation of user-supplied input and lack of proper token-based request verification. Attack vectors include CWE-352 (CSRF), CWE-601 (URL redirection), and CWE-640 (weak cryptographic protection), allowing an attacker with network access and low privilege credentials to craft malicious links or pages that, when clicked by a higher-privileged user, execute unauthorized actions with full system privileges. The attack surface is accessible via HTTPS, requiring no special network positioning.
Business impact
Compromise of iSupplier Portal exposes supplier relationship management to unauthorized access, data theft, and modification. Attackers could alter purchase orders, invoices, or delivery schedules; exfiltrate sensitive supplier agreements or performance metrics; or lock legitimate suppliers out of the system. For organizations managing critical supply chains through this portal, such compromise could disrupt procurement workflows, create financial discrepancies, and damage supplier trust. The requirement for user interaction may limit mass exploitation, but targeted spear-phishing of procurement staff remains a realistic attack path.
Affected systems
Oracle E-Business Suite iSupplier Portal versions 12.2.3, 12.2.4, 12.2.5, 12.2.6, 12.2.7, 12.2.8, 12.2.9, 12.2.10, 12.2.11, 12.2.12, 12.2.13, 12.2.14, and 12.2.15 are vulnerable. Organizations should identify which versions are deployed in production and development environments. The vulnerability affects any organization using iSupplier Portal as part of their Oracle E-Business Suite footprint, particularly those with externally accessible supplier portals.
Exploitability
The vulnerability is rated as easily exploitable: it requires only network access (no authentication bypass needed), low privilege credentials (a supplier account or low-level employee), and straightforward attack methodology. However, successful exploitation depends on social engineering—an attacker must convince a legitimate user (typically a procurement officer or supplier manager with higher access) to click a malicious link or visit a compromised site. This human interaction requirement moderates the overall risk somewhat, but determined threat actors can craft convincing phishing campaigns targeting procurement departments. The vulnerability has not been added to CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog as of the published date, suggesting limited in-the-wild exploitation to date, but organizations should not rely on this for prioritization.
Remediation
Apply the security patch released by Oracle for iSupplier Portal. Verify the specific patch version against Oracle's official security advisory for your current version (12.2.x). Patches address input validation and CSRF token generation. Patching should be prioritized for production environments and tested in a staging environment first, given the criticality of supplier management workflows. For organizations unable to patch immediately, implement compensating controls: enforce multi-factor authentication for iSupplier Portal access, restrict portal access by IP range if possible, and deploy proxy-based CSRF filtering.
Patch guidance
Consult Oracle's critical patch update (CPU) advisory for the June 2026 release cycle to obtain the correct patch build number for your specific iSupplier Portal version. Apply patches during a planned maintenance window to avoid disruption to supplier access. Test patching in a non-production environment first, confirming that existing supplier integrations and workflows continue to function. After patching, verify that CSRF protections are enabled and that security event logging is active. Document the patch version applied and the date of application for audit and compliance records. Consider automating patch deployment across all iSupplier Portal instances to reduce manual error.
Detection guidance
Monitor for suspicious activity in iSupplier Portal logs: look for unexpected changes to purchase orders, invoices, or supplier master data originating from unusual user sessions or IP addresses. Search for HTTP requests with missing or invalid CSRF tokens, failed authentication attempts followed by successful session hijacking, and unusual referrer headers in HTTPS requests. Alert on suppliers or employees reporting unauthorized access, particularly after receiving unsolicited emails with iSupplier Portal links. Deploy Web Application Firewall (WAF) rules to detect and block requests that lack valid session tokens or contain known URL redirection patterns. Enable audit logging for all data modifications within the portal, and configure alerting for bulk data exports or administrative privilege escalations.
Why prioritize this
This vulnerability warrants immediate attention due to its HIGH CVSS 3.1 score of 8.0 and the critical nature of the affected system. iSupplier Portal is integral to supply chain operations; its compromise can have cascading business impacts beyond the portal itself. Although the vulnerability requires user interaction and has not yet appeared in public exploit code, the ease of exploitation, combined with the high-value targeting opportunity (procurement teams), makes it an attractive target for sophisticated threat actors and financially motivated adversaries. The broad range of affected versions (12 consecutive updates) suggests widespread deployment across enterprise customers.
Risk score, explained
The CVSS 3.1 Base Score of 8.0 (HIGH severity) reflects the combination of: network accessibility (AV:N), low attack complexity (AC:L), requirement for low privilege (PR:L), necessary user interaction (UI:R), and impact on all three security pillars—confidentiality, integrity, and availability (C:H/I:H/A:H). The requirement for user interaction prevents a perfect 9.0+ score, but the eventual outcome of complete system compromise and the critical role of the affected component justify the 8.0 rating. In context of supply chain risk and the targeting appeal to adversaries, the real-world priority should be considered at or above the CVSS score.
Frequently asked questions
Does this vulnerability allow an unauthenticated attacker to compromise iSupplier Portal?
No. The attacker must possess low-privilege credentials to the portal (such as a supplier account or junior employee account) and must convince a legitimate user with higher privileges to interact with the attack vector. This dual requirement moderates the overall risk but does not eliminate it, as supplier accounts are often shared or easily compromised, and procurement staff are regular targets of phishing campaigns.
Is this vulnerability currently being exploited in the wild?
As of the CVE publication date, the vulnerability has not been added to CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog, suggesting that widespread active exploitation has not been reported. However, the absence of a KEV listing does not guarantee that exploitation is not occurring; it may indicate that exploitation has not yet been publicly disclosed or detected by major security organizations.
What is the difference between patching and compensating controls for this vulnerability?
Patching addresses the root cause by fixing the input validation and CSRF token generation flaws in the Oracle code. Compensating controls—such as multi-factor authentication, IP whitelisting, and WAF rules—reduce the likelihood or impact of exploitation without removing the underlying vulnerability. Patching is the preferred long-term solution; compensating controls are a temporary risk reduction measure while patches are being tested and deployed.
If we use a firewall to restrict access to iSupplier Portal, does that eliminate the risk?
Restricting network access reduces the attack surface but does not eliminate risk for organizations that must allow external supplier access to the portal. Even internally facing instances carry risk if an insider or compromised account exists. Firewall restrictions are a useful control layer but should be combined with patching and other defenses for comprehensive risk reduction.
This analysis is based on Oracle's official CVE disclosure and CVSS assessment. Patch version numbers, specific remediation steps, and KEV inclusion status should be verified against Oracle's latest security advisories and CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. This intelligence is provided for informational purposes to aid security decision-making and does not constitute legal, compliance, or technical support. Organizations must conduct their own risk assessment based on their specific deployment, threat environment, and business context. No exploit code or weaponized proof-of-concept is provided or endorsed. SEC.co recommends consulting with Oracle support and internal security teams before applying patches to production systems. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-07-24. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).
Related vulnerabilities
- CVE-2026-35258HIGHOracle WebLogic Server Console Open Redirect Vulnerability – Analysis & Patch Guidance
- CVE-2026-35259HIGHOracle WebLogic Server Console RCE – CVSS 8.8 Analysis & Patch Guidance
- CVE-2026-35266HIGHOracle REST Data Services Authentication & Data Integrity Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-35302HIGHOracle WebLogic Server Console Vulnerability (CVSS 8.3)
- CVE-2026-46787HIGHOracle WebCenter Content CSRF Vulnerability – HIGH Severity
- CVE-2026-46796HIGHOracle WebCenter Sites Open Redirect Vulnerability (CVSS 8.0)
- CVE-2026-46806HIGHOracle WebCenter Content Open Redirect Vulnerability – CVSS 8.2
- CVE-2026-46869MEDIUMMySQL Shell Data Exposure via CSRF (CVSS 6.5)