CVE-2026-46557: ImageMagick Stack Overflow in fx Operation – Patch Guide
ImageMagick, a widely-used image editing and manipulation library, contains a stack overflow vulnerability in its fx (effects) operation. When processing specially crafted input, the affected code fails to validate recursion depth, allowing an attacker to exhaust the stack and crash the application or potentially execute arbitrary code. The vulnerability affects all versions before 7.1.2-23 and can be triggered locally without user interaction or special privileges.
Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain
- CVSS
- 3.1 · 6.2 MEDIUM · CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
- Weaknesses (CWE)
- CWE-674
- Affected products
- 1 configuration(s)
- Published / Modified
- 2026-06-10 / 2026-06-17
NVD description (verbatim)
ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to version 7.1.2-23, due to a missing depth check a stack overflow can occur in the fx operation by passing a crafted argument. This issue has been patched in version 7.1.2-23.
1 reference(s) · View on NVD →
SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source
Technical summary
CVE-2026-46557 stems from an improper depth check in ImageMagick's fx operation handler. The vulnerability is classified as CWE-674 (Uncontrolled Recursion), meaning the code does not properly limit how deeply it recurses when processing fx arguments. An attacker can craft malicious input that causes unbounded recursion, resulting in a stack overflow. The CVSS 3.1 score of 6.2 (MEDIUM) reflects a local attack vector with high availability impact but no confidentiality or integrity compromise. The vulnerability requires no user interaction and no special privileges to exploit.
Business impact
This vulnerability poses a denial-of-service risk to any service or application relying on ImageMagick to process user-supplied image data or effect parameters. Organizations using ImageMagick in batch processing pipelines, web image services, or automation tools risk service interruption if an attacker submits malicious input. However, the absence of confidentiality or integrity impact limits the scope—data corruption and information disclosure are not direct concerns. The medium CVSS score reflects that while availability is significantly impacted, the threat surface is local. Non-critical systems using ImageMagick should prioritize patching in regular maintenance windows; critical image processing services should prioritize more aggressively.
Affected systems
ImageMagick versions prior to 7.1.2-23 are vulnerable. Any deployment of ImageMagick in this version range is at risk, regardless of the underlying operating system. This includes systems using ImageMagick as a library in other applications (e.g., web frameworks, document converters, graphics processors) and standalone command-line usage. Organizations should audit their software bill of materials for direct ImageMagick dependencies and indirect inclusion through application dependencies.
Exploitability
Exploitation requires only local access and the ability to supply input to ImageMagick's fx operation. No authentication, user interaction, or special privileges are needed. The attack is straightforward: craft an fx argument with excessive nesting or recursion depth and pass it to an ImageMagick command or API. However, exploitability depends on whether the target application exposes the fx operation to untrusted input—not all ImageMagick use cases exercise this code path. External network exploitation is not feasible due to the local-only attack vector, but internal attackers, compromised processes, or web services that process user-supplied effect parameters are at risk. The vulnerability is not currently tracked in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog.
Remediation
Upgrade ImageMagick to version 7.1.2-23 or later. This patch version includes the required depth check to prevent unbounded recursion in the fx operation. Organizations should verify the upgrade path for their specific deployment model (system package, container image, language bindings, etc.). After patching, restart any services that depend on ImageMagick to ensure the new library version is in use. For organizations unable to patch immediately, consider restricting access to ImageMagick processing or disabling the fx operation if it is not essential to your workflows.
Patch guidance
Verify and apply version 7.1.2-23 or later from the official ImageMagick repository. If you are using ImageMagick via a downstream package manager (apt, yum, homebrew, pip, npm, etc.), check whether your distribution has backported or released the patch in its stable channel. For containerized deployments, rebuild images with the patched ImageMagick version and redeploy. If ImageMagick is statically linked into your application, recompile with the patched library version. Test the patch in a non-production environment first, especially if ImageMagick is integral to your image processing pipeline, to confirm functionality is preserved.
Detection guidance
Monitor system logs and application error logs for stack overflow exceptions or segmentation faults originating from ImageMagick processes, particularly when processing image files or fx operations. Intrusion detection systems may flag attempts to pass deeply nested or excessively recursive fx arguments. Review web server and application logs for unusual ImageMagick-related API calls with crafted effect parameters. On systems where fx operation is not used, consider logging or blocking any invocations of ImageMagick with fx flags. Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) tools can alert on unexpected process crashes or resource exhaustion tied to ImageMagick.
Why prioritize this
This vulnerability should be prioritized based on your organization's exposure: (1) If ImageMagick is used in publicly facing web services or processes untrusted input, patch urgently. (2) If ImageMagick is used internally in automation or batch processing with controlled input, schedule patching in the next regular maintenance window. (3) If ImageMagick is not actively used, deprioritize but include in your general library update program. The medium CVSS score and absence of KEV listing indicate this is not an emergency, but the ease of exploitation (local, no privileges required) and the simplicity of the fix warrant relatively quick action for exposed systems.
Risk score, explained
The CVSS 3.1 score of 6.2 (MEDIUM) is driven by: (1) Local attack vector—the attacker must have local access or be able to submit input to a local ImageMagick process; (2) Low attack complexity—no special conditions or timing required to trigger the stack overflow; (3) No privileges required—any user can supply crafted input; (4) High availability impact—the stack overflow causes a denial of service; (5) No confidentiality or integrity impact—the vulnerability does not leak data or corrupt files. The score does not account for widespread deployment or ease of exploitation in public-facing scenarios, which would elevate real-world risk beyond the numeric CVSS rating.
Frequently asked questions
Can this vulnerability be exploited remotely?
No. The attack vector is local-only, meaning the attacker must have local access to the affected system or be able to send input directly to an ImageMagick process running on that system. A remote attacker could only exploit this if they trick a local process into processing their crafted input—for example, if a web service accepts image files with fx parameters and passes them unsanitized to ImageMagick. In that case, the attack would originate from the network, but the vulnerability itself is triggered locally on the processing system.
Does this affect ImageMagick.js, Python Wand, or other language bindings?
Yes, any language or framework that wraps or depends on the underlying ImageMagick C library can be affected if it exposes the fx operation. This includes ImageMagick.js (Node.js), Wand (Python), ImageMagick PHP extension, and others. Patching the underlying ImageMagick library will resolve the vulnerability in these bindings. Verify that your package manager includes the patched C library version.
If we don't use the fx operation, are we vulnerable?
Likely not. The vulnerability is specific to the fx operation's argument handling. If your application never invokes fx, this code path should not be executed. However, if you use ImageMagick in a general-purpose image processing tool or service that accepts user commands without restrictions, an attacker could attempt to trigger fx operations. Review your application logic to confirm fx is either disabled or only used with trusted input.
What should we do if we can't patch immediately?
In the short term, restrict access to ImageMagick processing to trusted users only, disable or restrict the fx operation if it is not essential, and monitor logs for suspicious activity or crashes. Consider using a sandboxed or containerized environment to isolate ImageMagick from critical systems. Plan patching into your maintenance schedule as soon as feasible, prioritizing systems that process untrusted input.
This analysis is provided for informational purposes and reflects the vulnerability details as of the publication date (2026-06-10). Patch version numbers and remediation guidance are based on official vendor information; verify all patch versions and compatibility against the ImageMagick project's official release notes and security advisories before deploying. Organizations should conduct their own risk assessment based on their specific deployment architecture, data sensitivity, and exposure to untrusted input. SEC.co makes no warranty regarding the completeness or accuracy of this analysis and assumes no liability for decisions made based on this information. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-07-20. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).
Related vulnerabilities
- CVE-2026-45664MEDIUMImageMagick MNG Coder Resource Limit Bypass (CVSS 5.3)
- CVE-2026-48734MEDIUMImageMagick Stack Overflow in MVG File Parsing
- CVE-2025-7005MEDIUMAvast/AVG/Norton Antivirus Denial-of-Service via Malformed PE File
- CVE-2025-7010MEDIUMAvast Antivirus Stack Overflow DoS Vulnerability – VPS Definition Patch Required
- CVE-2026-40989MEDIUMSpring Cloud Function Infinite Recursion OOM Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-44740MEDIUMBilly Go Library Denial-of-Service via Input Validation Flaws
- CVE-2026-47306MEDIUMrlottie Uncontrolled Recursion Denial-of-Service Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-47320MEDIUMrlottie Memory Safety Vulnerability – Uninitialized Pointer & Recursion Flaw