LOW 3.1

CVE-2026-45739: Strawberry GraphQL Credential Exposure in GraphiQL Headers

Strawberry GraphQL, a popular library for building GraphQL APIs, has a flaw in its bundled GraphiQL interface (versions 0.288.4 through 0.315.3) where sensitive headers entered by developers are inadvertently exposed in the browser URL. When a developer pastes an authorization token or other credential into the GraphiQL headers editor, that value becomes part of the page URL and persists in browser history, shareable links, and server access logs. This creates a credential leakage risk if someone gains access to those logs or if links are shared. The issue has been patched in version 0.315.4.

Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain

CVSS
3.1 · 3.1 LOW · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Weaknesses (CWE)
CWE-200, CWE-201
Affected products
1 configuration(s)
Published / Modified
2026-06-04 / 2026-06-17

NVD description (verbatim)

Strawberry GraphQL is a library for creating GraphQL APIs. In versions 0.288.4 through 0.315.3, Strawberry's bundled GraphiQL template wrote values from the GraphiQL headers editor into the browser URL query string. If a user entered a sensitive header, such as `Authorization: Bearer <token>`, the value could become visible in browser history, copied links, and server/proxy/CDN access logs after a page reload or shared request. Version 0.315.4 patches the issue.

5 reference(s) · View on NVD →

SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source

Technical summary

The vulnerability stems from Strawberry's GraphiQL template implementation writing header values directly into the browser URL query string. The affected versions (0.288.4–0.315.3) lack input sanitization or secure handling of sensitive header data in the UI layer. When a user interacts with the GraphiQL headers editor—a convenience feature for testing API calls—the library writes those values into the URL without distinguishing between safe and sensitive data. This violates the principle of least privilege for credential exposure: authentication tokens, API keys, and other secrets should never be written to URLs or transmitted via query parameters. The CVSS 3.1 score of 3.1 (LOW) reflects that exploitation requires user interaction (manually entering credentials into the UI) and network access, with limited confidentiality impact to the affected client's local context.

Business impact

For organizations using Strawberry GraphQL in development, staging, or internal API environments, this vulnerability primarily threatens credential hygiene and audit integrity. If developers have entered Bearer tokens or other secrets into the GraphiQL interface during testing, those credentials may now exist in browser history, web server access logs, CDN logs, or shared URLs. Attackers with access to logs (e.g., via a lateral move, supply chain compromise of log aggregation, or misconfigured access controls) could harvest credentials. The impact is lowest in ephemeral dev environments but highest in shared staging systems or where logs are broadly accessible. Exposure is also a compliance concern: evidence of plaintext credentials in logs may trigger findings during security audits or incident investigations.

Affected systems

Strawberry GraphQL users operating versions 0.288.4 through 0.315.3 are affected. The vulnerability is specific to the bundled GraphiQL template; it affects any deployment where developers or QA engineers use the GraphiQL web UI to test or debug GraphQL queries. The risk is highest in shared development, staging, or internal API environments where multiple users interact with the same instance and where server/proxy/CDN access logs are retained. Self-hosted or cloud-deployed instances are equally at risk if the GraphiQL interface is enabled and accessible.

Exploitability

Exploitability is constrained by several factors. First, an attacker must have a reason to interact with or monitor a GraphiQL instance—either as an authorized user or via network access if the interface is publicly exposed (which would be a separate misconfiguration). Second, the attacker must observe a developer or user entering a sensitive header (or have access to logs after the fact). Third, the attacker must extract credentials from browser history, logs, or link metadata. The CVSS vector (AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R) reflects these barriers: user interaction is required, and attack complexity is high. Active in-the-wild exploitation is unlikely; the primary risk is passive credential harvesting from logs or shared links rather than real-time attack.

Remediation

Upgrade to Strawberry GraphQL version 0.315.4 or later. The patch removes or sanitizes the unsafe URL-writing behavior in the GraphiQL template. Organizations should verify that the upgrade completes successfully in development environments before rolling to staging or production. For organizations unable to upgrade immediately, consider disabling the GraphiQL interface in non-development environments or restricting network access to it via firewall rules or authentication gateways. Review server/proxy/CDN access logs for any evidence of leaked credentials (look for Authorization, Bearer, or API key patterns in URLs). If credentials are discovered, rotate them immediately and treat as a potential exposure incident.

Patch guidance

Update Strawberry GraphQL to version 0.315.4 or any subsequent release. Verify the update in a non-production environment first to ensure compatibility with existing API schemas and custom resolvers. Most Strawberry deployments use standard dependency management (pip, Poetry, npm); a straightforward version bump should resolve the issue. If your deployment uses pinned versions or vendored code, explicitly update the version constraint and re-run your dependency installer. Post-upgrade, clear browser caches and restart any GraphiQL instances to ensure the new template is in use. Verify that the patch is applied by checking the version string in your Strawberry installation (e.g., `strawberry --version` or equivalent in your environment).

Detection guidance

Search web server, proxy, and CDN access logs for suspicious patterns: (1) URLs containing `Authorization`, `Bearer`, `api_key`, or `token` in the query string, especially those arriving at GraphiQL endpoints; (2) repeated queries from the same source containing credential-like strings; (3) unusual geographic or user-agent patterns accessing GraphiQL. Monitor browser caches or browsing history on developer workstations for URL artifacts containing sensitive headers. If using a Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) system, create detection rules for authorization tokens appearing in URL fields. Note that this vulnerability produces a logical trail (credentials in logs) rather than a network signature, so log analysis and historical review are the primary detection methods.

Why prioritize this

Despite a LOW CVSS score, this vulnerability warrants prompt attention because it creates a systemic credential exposure risk. The combination of ease of introduction (developers naturally paste tokens into UI fields) and difficulty of detection (exposure is silent, logged passively) makes it a data hygiene concern. However, the low prioritization is justified by the constrained attack surface (GraphiQL is usually internal-only) and the absence of active exploitation reports. Prioritize patching in shared or staging environments where logs are retained long-term and accessible to multiple users. Development-only instances can be patched on the next routine maintenance cycle unless logs are broadly shared.

Risk score, explained

The CVSS 3.1 score of 3.1 reflects a low but non-trivial risk. Network accessibility (AV:N) is balanced by high attack complexity (AC:H), which captures the requirement for user interaction and log access. The scope is unchanged (S:U), and confidentiality impact is low (C:L) because exposure is limited to credentials directly entered by the victim. Integrity and availability are not affected (I:N/A:N). The score appropriately de-emphasizes this as a critical threat while recognizing that it enables secondary attacks (credential replay, privilege escalation) if discovered. Organizations should factor in their own log retention policies and access controls when translating this score to internal risk ratings.

Frequently asked questions

Does this affect my production GraphQL API, or just the GraphiQL interface?

Only the GraphiQL interface (the web-based query editor) is affected. Your production GraphQL API itself is not compromised. However, if GraphiQL is enabled and accessible in a production or staging environment, developers testing against production may leak credentials. It is a best practice to disable or restrict GraphiQL in production entirely.

If I'm only using Strawberry GraphQL as a library and not the bundled GraphiQL, am I at risk?

No. If you are using Strawberry to build a GraphQL API but serving your own custom frontend or a third-party query editor, this vulnerability does not apply. The flaw is specific to the GraphiQL template bundled with Strawberry. If you are unsure whether you are using the bundled interface, check your application configuration for references to GraphiQL endpoints or templates.

What should I do if I find credentials in my logs?

First, assume they are compromised and rotate them immediately (new tokens, API keys, passwords). Then, check access logs to see if anyone else has accessed those credentials (e.g., downloaded a log file, accessed a shared URL). If you cannot determine who had access, treat the breach as broader and escalate to your security team. Finally, update to Strawberry 0.315.4 and establish a policy preventing the use of GraphiQL in shared environments.

Can this be exploited remotely without any prior access?

Exploitation requires either: (1) the attacker to access logs or browser history (post-facto), or (2) the attacker to have network access to the GraphiQL interface and social-engineer a user into revealing credentials in real time. Neither is trivial. If GraphiQL is behind a VPN or authentication layer, risk is significantly lower. If it is publicly exposed on the internet, isolate it immediately and treat any leaked credentials as compromised.

This analysis is based on published CVE data and vendor advisories as of the modification date (2026-06-17). CVSS scores and severity ratings are provided by the NVP and reflect a generic risk model; your organizational risk may differ based on deployment, log retention, and access controls. Upgrade guidance should be verified against the official Strawberry GraphQL release notes. Organizations are responsible for validating patches in their own environments before production deployment. SEC.co does not provide legal or compliance advice; consult your security and legal teams regarding disclosure or regulatory reporting obligations. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-07-07. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).