CVE-2026-45466: Heap Buffer Overflow in Microsoft Office Word—Risk Assessment & Patch Guidance
A flaw in Microsoft Office Word allows an attacker to trigger a heap-based buffer overflow by crafting a malicious document. When a user opens the document, sensitive information stored in the application's memory could be read by the attacker. This is a local attack—the attacker cannot exploit it remotely—and it requires user interaction to open the malicious file. The confidentiality risk is limited; no system damage or data modification occurs.
Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain
- CVSS
- 3.1 · 3.3 LOW · CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
- Weaknesses (CWE)
- CWE-122
- Affected products
- 9 configuration(s)
- Published / Modified
- 2026-06-09 / 2026-06-19
NVD description (verbatim)
Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office Word allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information locally.
1 reference(s) · View on NVD →
SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source
Technical summary
CVE-2026-45466 is a heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability (CWE-122) in Microsoft Office Word triggered through document parsing. The vulnerability permits information disclosure via memory read operations when processing a specially crafted Office document. The attack vector is local with no privileges required, but user interaction is mandatory. The CVSS 3.1 score of 3.3 (LOW) reflects the scope unchanged, absence of integrity or availability impact, and requirement for end-user action to materialize the risk.
Business impact
Organizations should assess exposure based on Word usage patterns and document handling practices. Since exploitation requires a user to open a malicious document, the practical risk depends on email filtering, user awareness, and whether sensitive data resides in memory during document processing. For environments with strong email controls and user training, the risk is mitigated. However, targeted spear-phishing campaigns could increase exposure for organizations handling classified or proprietary information that could be leaked through memory disclosure.
Affected systems
The vulnerability affects multiple Microsoft Office product lines: Microsoft 365 Apps, Microsoft Office 2021, and Microsoft Office 2024. The specific affected components include Word across these versions. Organizations should inventory Word deployments across these product families. This is not limited to a single release or patch level; verify against the vendor advisory for the exact affected build numbers and supported editions.
Exploitability
Practical exploitation is constrained by multiple factors. An attacker must craft a specially malicious Office document and then deliver it to a target user, requiring social engineering or spear-phishing. The user must then open the document in Word. Once triggered, the overflow occurs in the application's heap, potentially exposing sensitive data in memory—for example, recently accessed documents, clipboard contents, or encryption keys. However, weaponized exploit code is not known to be widely available, and the vulnerability is not listed in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, reducing immediate threat severity.
Remediation
Microsoft has issued security updates addressing this vulnerability across affected product versions. Apply the latest security patches from Microsoft for Microsoft 365 Apps, Office 2021, and Office 2024 immediately. Organizations should prioritize patching in environments where users frequently open untrusted documents or receive email attachments. Concurrent defensive measures—including email gateway filtering, user security awareness training on phishing and malicious attachments, and network-based detection—further reduce risk while patches are deployed.
Patch guidance
Access Microsoft Update or the Microsoft 365 admin center and deploy the latest security patches for affected Word versions. For Office 2021 and Office 2024, patches are delivered through Windows Update or the Office update mechanism, depending on your deployment model. Verify the patch version in your Microsoft advisory documentation to confirm you are applying the correct security update. Test patches in a non-production environment first to ensure compatibility with your workflows and any add-ins. Deployment should be prioritized for high-risk user groups, followed by staged rollout to the broader organization.
Detection guidance
Monitor for unusual document parsing activity, heap corruption indicators, or abnormal process behavior when Word opens documents. Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) tools can identify process memory anomalies or access patterns consistent with heap exploitation. Email security systems should flag Office documents with suspicious structural properties or embedded content. Log Word process crashes or memory access violations. User reports of unexpected memory access or slow document opening may indicate exploitation attempts. Network-based detection is limited since this is a local attack; focus on endpoint and email gateway controls.
Why prioritize this
Despite a LOW CVSS score, this vulnerability warrants prompt but not emergency response. The requirement for user interaction and local scope limits immediate organizational risk. However, the information disclosure impact means that targeted campaigns could expose sensitive data from users' systems. Organizations with high-value intellectual property, regulated data, or users targeted by advanced persistent threats should prioritize patches sooner. General enterprises can follow standard patch deployment schedules but should not defer indefinitely.
Risk score, explained
The CVSS 3.1 score of 3.3 reflects the combination of local-only attack surface (not network-exploitable), mandatory user interaction, absence of integrity and availability impacts, and confidentiality risk limited to information accessible in the vulnerable process's memory. The score is not a measure of business criticality; it is a technical baseline. Organizations handling sensitive information should apply their own risk rating framework to account for data sensitivity and exposure likelihood beyond the technical CVSS metric.
Frequently asked questions
Can this vulnerability be exploited over the network or through email without user action?
No. The vulnerability requires local access and mandatory user interaction—specifically, opening a malicious document in Word. An attacker cannot exploit it remotely. Email delivery is the likely attack vector, but the user must open the document for the overflow to trigger. Email filtering and user awareness are effective mitigations.
What information could an attacker actually disclose?
The buffer overflow allows reading from the application's heap memory. This could include fragments of recently opened documents, clipboard data, encryption keys, or other sensitive information that happens to reside in Word's memory space at the time of exploitation. The exact exposure depends on what data is in memory when the malicious document is processed.
Is this vulnerability being actively exploited in the wild?
As of the publication date, this vulnerability is not listed in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, and there is no evidence of widespread active exploitation. However, organizations should not assume indefinite safety; patch deployment should proceed according to your organization's vulnerability management policy.
Do I need to patch immediately if most of my users work with trusted documents only?
Immediate patching is less critical if your organization strictly controls document sources and has strong email filtering. However, risks shift with personnel changes and social engineering sophistication. A standard patch deployment cycle—within 30 days for LOW-severity vulnerabilities—is reasonable. Organizations with high-risk users or sensitive data should patch sooner.
This analysis is based on publicly disclosed vulnerability information current as of the publication date. CVSS scores, product versions, and affected build numbers are derived from vendor advisories and MITRE data; verify them against the official Microsoft security advisory before deployment decisions. This explainer does not constitute legal, compliance, or professional security advice. Organizations should apply their own risk assessment frameworks, considering their specific threat landscape, data sensitivity, and operational constraints. Patch availability, timing, and compatibility may vary by product configuration; test all updates in non-production environments before broad deployment. SEC.co does not provide warranties regarding the completeness or accuracy of this analysis beyond the source data provided. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-07-16. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).
Related vulnerabilities
- CVE-2026-10946HIGHChrome Heap Buffer Overflow in Media Processing—Patch Guidance
- CVE-2026-10949HIGHChrome Heap Overflow Sandbox Escape Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-11124HIGHCritical Chrome Skia Integer Overflow Allows Remote Code Execution
- CVE-2026-40404HIGHWindows UDFS Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability Analysis
- CVE-2026-41108HIGHWindows DNS Heap Buffer Overflow Privilege Escalation
- CVE-2026-42980HIGHWindows NT Kernel Integer Underflow Privilege Escalation Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-42992HIGHRemote Desktop Client Heap Buffer Overflow RCE
- CVE-2026-42993HIGHHeap-Based Buffer Overflow in Remote Desktop Client—Analysis & Patch Guidance