HIGH 7.2

CVE-2026-44914: Apache NiFi Authorization Bypass in Process Group Replacement

Apache NiFi versions 1.12.0 through 2.9.0 contain a flaw where the system fails to properly verify user permissions when someone tries to replace Process Groups that contain restricted components. Restricted components are those requiring elevated privileges, but the framework skipped this authorization check during replacement operations. This means a user with basic write access could circumvent intended security controls and deploy restricted components without proper authorization. The vulnerability is effectively a privilege escalation through authorization bypass in the Process Group replacement workflow.

Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain

CVSS
3.1 · 7.2 HIGH · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Weaknesses (CWE)
CWE-862
Affected products
1 configuration(s)
Published / Modified
2026-06-22 / 2026-06-24

NVD description (verbatim)

Apache NiFi 1.12.0 through 2.9.0 are missing authorization when replacing Process Groups that include extension components with specific Required Permissions based on the Restricted annotation. The Restricted annotation indicates additional privileges required, but framework authorization did not check restricted status when handling requests to replace Process Groups. The missing authorization permits a user with general write access to add components with Restricted status. Apache NiFi installations that do not implement specific authorization for Restricted components are not subject to this vulnerability because the framework enforces write permissions as the security boundary. Upgrading to Apache NiFi 2.9.0 is the recommended mitigation, which removes the implementation of Restricted status authorization from the framework.

2 reference(s) · View on NVD →

SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source

Technical summary

CVE-2026-44914 is an authorization bypass vulnerability in Apache NiFi's Process Group replacement handler. The Restricted annotation marks components requiring specific elevated privileges, but the framework failed to validate restricted component status during ProcessGroup replacement requests, only enforcing general write permissions. This created a gap where frame-level authorization checks were sufficient to add restricted components that should require additional permission validation. The vulnerability stems from incomplete authorization logic in the replacement workflow, distinct from the broader write-permission boundary. NiFi instances relying on Restricted annotation-based access control for sensitive components are at risk; deployments treating write permissions as the sole boundary for component access are unaffected.

Business impact

An attacker with write access to NiFi—potentially a developer, operator, or compromised service account—could inject restricted components into Process Groups without proper authorization. Restricted components often include those managing external system access, sensitive data handling, or administrative functions. Unauthorized introduction of such components could enable lateral movement, unauthorized data exfiltration, denial of service, or pipeline tampering. In multi-tenant or highly regulated environments where fine-grained access control is a compliance requirement, this bypass directly undermines that control model.

Affected systems

Apache NiFi versions 1.12.0 through 2.9.0 are vulnerable. The vulnerability applies to all deployments and operating systems running these versions. However, the actual risk depends on authorization model: installations using Restricted annotation-based access control for sensitive components face direct exposure; those treating framework write permissions as the sole access boundary are not subject to exploitation.

Exploitability

Exploitation requires existing write access to the NiFi instance, making this a medium-to-high barrier in typical deployments. An attacker cannot exploit this unauthenticated. However, once write access is obtained—either through legitimate provisioning, credential compromise, or lateral movement—the exploitation is straightforward: submit a Process Group replacement request containing restricted components, and the missing authorization check permits deployment. No complex techniques or race conditions are required.

Remediation

Upgrade to Apache NiFi 2.9.0 or later, which removes Restricted status authorization from the framework entirely, addressing the inconsistent enforcement. Verify against the vendor advisory for final release availability. Organizations unable to upgrade immediately should review their authorization model: if you do not rely on Restricted annotation for access control and treat write permissions as your boundary, your risk is lower. For enhanced mitigation on unpatched systems, implement external authorization validation via API gateway or reverse proxy to intercept Process Group replacement requests and verify restricted component restrictions before forwarding.

Patch guidance

The recommended fix is upgrading to Apache NiFi 2.9.0. Verify this version is available and stable for your deployment environment before upgrading. Review the release notes and any breaking changes. For environments with custom extensions using the Restricted annotation, verify behavior after upgrading, as the framework no longer enforces restricted status at runtime. Test the upgrade in a staging environment first, especially if you rely on NiFi's framework-level restricted component enforcement for multi-tenant isolation.

Detection guidance

Monitor NiFi audit logs for Process Group replacement operations (PUT /nifi-api/process-groups/{id} or similar endpoints), especially those submitted by users with non-administrative roles. Alert on replacement requests that include components with the Restricted annotation. If NiFi provides component deployment audit trails, cross-reference write access logs with actual component deployments to identify discrepancies. Network-based detection is limited without payload inspection; prioritize log-based detection of suspicious replacement patterns. Search for any deployed components not previously visible in audits or not aligned with expected pipeline changes.

Why prioritize this

This is a HIGH-severity privilege escalation affecting all NiFi users relying on Restricted annotation-based access control. The network-accessible nature, low attack complexity, and direct impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability justify urgent remediation. Although it requires initial write access, write access is often more broadly granted than administrative access in operational environments, increasing the attack surface. If your NiFi instance hosts sensitive data pipelines or integrates with critical systems, upgrade immediately.

Risk score, explained

CVSS 3.1 score of 7.2 (HIGH) reflects: network accessibility (AV:N), low attack complexity (AC:L), requirement for high-privilege user (PR:H), no user interaction (UI:N), unchanged scope (S:U), and high impact across confidentiality, integrity, and availability (C:H/I:H/A:H). The PR:H rating acknowledges the attacker needs write access rather than unauthenticated access, but does not diminish the severity once that access is obtained. The high CIA impact reflects the potential for unauthorized component deployment affecting pipeline security, data integrity, and availability.

Frequently asked questions

Does this vulnerability affect NiFi installations that only use basic authentication and do not rely on Restricted annotations?

Partially. If your deployment treats write permissions as the sole access boundary and does not use Restricted annotations for fine-grained component control, you are not subject to this specific bypass. However, any user with write access can still deploy arbitrary components, so defense-in-depth practices and write-access controls remain critical.

What is the Restricted annotation in NiFi, and which components typically use it?

The Restricted annotation marks NiFi components that require additional security review or privileges due to sensitive capabilities—for example, components accessing external systems, executing custom code, or handling credentials. Examples may include script processors, SSH components, or JDBC processors. Consult your NiFi documentation and component inventory to identify which restricted components exist in your deployment.

Can I mitigate this without upgrading if I restrict write access very carefully?

Write restrictions reduce risk by narrowing the attacker pool, but do not eliminate the vulnerability. Any write-access holder—including developers, operators, or compromised service accounts—could exploit it. Upgrade to 2.9.0 for complete remediation. In the interim, implement additional network or API-level controls to validate Process Group replacement requests.

Will upgrading to NiFi 2.9.0 break my existing authorization policies based on Restricted components?

The framework removes Restricted status authorization, meaning authorization enforcement for restricted components is no longer built-in. If you relied on the framework for this control, you must implement alternative authorization mechanisms before upgrading. Review your authorization architecture and test in staging; consult the NiFi 2.9.0 release notes for migration guidance.

This analysis is provided for informational purposes. Verify all patch versions, affected product versions, and remediation steps against official Apache NiFi advisories and your vendor documentation. CVSS scores and severity ratings are based on published data and may vary depending on your environment's configuration and risk profile. Always test patches in a non-production environment before deployment. SEC.co makes no warranty regarding the completeness or accuracy of this analysis and disclaims liability for consequences of reliance on this information. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-07-28. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).