CVE-2026-44803: Windows Win32K Integer Overflow Privilege Escalation
An integer overflow vulnerability exists in the Windows graphics subsystem (Win32K) that could allow an attacker with local access to execute code with system privileges. The flaw resides in graphics processing routines and can be triggered through user interaction, such as opening a specially crafted document in Microsoft Office applications. While exploitation requires local system access and user action, successful exploitation grants complete control over an affected system.
Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain
- CVSS
- 3.1 · 7.8 HIGH · CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
- Weaknesses (CWE)
- CWE-190
- Affected products
- 27 configuration(s)
- Published / Modified
- 2026-06-09 / 2026-06-19
NVD description (verbatim)
Integer overflow or wraparound in Windows Win32K - GRFX allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally.
1 reference(s) · View on NVD →
SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source
Technical summary
CVE-2026-44803 is an integer overflow vulnerability (CWE-190) in the Win32K graphics driver subsystem affecting multiple Windows versions and Office applications. The vulnerability occurs when mathematical operations on integer values fail to detect overflow conditions, allowing an attacker to bypass memory protections and achieve arbitrary code execution with elevated privileges. The attack vector is local, requires no special privileges to initiate, but does require user interaction to trigger (typically via opening a malicious Office document). The flaw impacts the graphics rendering pipeline used by Excel, PowerPoint, Word, and all supported Windows 10/11 versions as well as Windows Server editions from 2012 through 2025.
Business impact
Organizations face significant risk from this vulnerability because it enables local privilege escalation through widely-used Office applications. An attacker who gains initial user-level access—whether through phishing, supply chain compromise, or insider threat—can leverage a specially crafted document to obtain system-level control without additional credentials. This undermines endpoint security controls, enables lateral movement, data exfiltration, and persistence mechanisms. The broad scope of affected Office versions means most enterprise deployments remain exposed until patching is complete.
Affected systems
The vulnerability affects Microsoft Office 2016 and later versions (Excel, PowerPoint, Word), Windows 10 editions 1607 through 22H2, all Windows 11 versions (23H2 through 26H1), and Windows Server 2012 through 2025. Organizations running any supported Windows 10/11 desktop or Windows Server infrastructure with Office installed face potential exposure.
Exploitability
Exploitation requires local system access and user interaction—an attacker cannot trigger the vulnerability remotely. The attack typically manifests as a social engineering campaign distributing malicious Office documents. Once a user opens a crafted file, the graphics processing triggers the integer overflow silently, executing attacker code with system privileges. The CVSS score of 7.8 reflects the high impact (complete confidentiality, integrity, and availability compromise) offset by the local and interactive prerequisites. This is not a network-worm scenario but a dangerous local-privilege-escalation vector.
Remediation
Immediate patching is essential given the severity and broad affected product range. Microsoft has released security updates addressing this flaw. Organizations should prioritize patching in the following order: (1) user-facing systems where Office documents are frequently opened, (2) shared servers hosting document libraries or collaboration tools, (3) administrative workstations. Verify against the latest Microsoft security bulletins for exact patch versions applicable to your Windows and Office releases. Interim controls include restricting document opening from untrusted sources, disabling Office macro execution if not required, and enforcing application whitelisting.
Patch guidance
Consult Microsoft's official security update portal and your organization's patch management system for the specific KB articles and patch versions corresponding to your Windows edition and Office version. Updates address the Win32K integer overflow across all affected versions. Schedule patching during maintenance windows prioritizing high-risk systems first. Test patches in a non-production environment before broad deployment to ensure compatibility with line-of-business applications. For Windows Server environments, coordinate patching with change management to minimize service interruption.
Detection guidance
Monitor for suspicious Office document access patterns and failed graphics rendering attempts in event logs. Endpoint detection and response (EDR) solutions should flag unusual process creation chains initiated from Office applications (winword.exe, excel.exe, powerpnt.exe) spawning system-level processes or writing to protected memory regions. Network-based indicators are less useful given the local attack vector; focus on host-based detection. Look for registry modifications related to graphics subsystem configuration and unexpected kernel-mode activity correlated with document access.
Why prioritize this
This vulnerability merits immediate attention due to its high severity score (7.8), the ubiquity of affected Office applications across enterprises, and the local-to-system privilege escalation path it enables. Although it requires user interaction, the attack surface is large: any employee opening a malicious document represents an exploitation opportunity. The broad version scope (Windows 10 through 11, all recent Server editions) means patching complexity is significant, necessitating early planning and execution.
Risk score, explained
The CVSS 3.1 score of 7.8 (HIGH) reflects the complete compromise of confidentiality, integrity, and availability once exploitation succeeds, coupled with the local attack vector and absence of privilege requirements to initiate the attack. The score is moderated by the requirement for user interaction and local access. For enterprises, the true risk is elevated by the prevalence of Office use, the difficulty of monitoring all document sources, and the silent nature of exploitation. Organizations with strong endpoint controls and user awareness training can reduce risk below the base CVSS score; those with permissive document handling practices face higher real-world risk.
Frequently asked questions
Can this vulnerability be exploited over the network?
No. The vulnerability requires local system access and user interaction. An attacker must first gain access to the target machine and then convince a user to open a specially crafted Office document. Remote exploitation is not possible.
Do all Office documents pose a risk?
Only documents crafted to trigger the integer overflow in Win32K graphics processing present a risk. Legitimate Office files from trusted sources will not exploit the vulnerability. However, because malicious documents may appear benign, organizations should treat all documents from external or untrusted sources with caution until patching is complete.
What is the difference between this vulnerability and typical Office macro attacks?
This vulnerability exploits a flaw in the graphics subsystem itself, not VBA or macro execution. It triggers automatically during document rendering without requiring macro execution or user permission prompts. This makes it more dangerous than traditional macro attacks in some respects, as it bypasses macro security policies.
Will this vulnerability be added to CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog?
As of the current data, this vulnerability has not been added to the CISA KEV list. However, organizations should not interpret this as low risk—KEV status reflects active in-the-wild exploitation, not severity. Patch promptly regardless of KEV status.
This analysis is based on publicly available vulnerability data as of the publication date. Organizations should verify all technical details, affected versions, and patch availability directly with Microsoft security advisories and their vendors before implementing remediation. No exploit code or weaponization details are provided. This assessment does not constitute legal or compliance advice. Organizations must evaluate business risk within their own security architecture, regulatory environment, and threat landscape. Testing of patches in non-production environments is strongly recommended before enterprise deployment. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-07-16. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).
Related vulnerabilities
- CVE-2026-10921HIGHChrome Dawn Integer Overflow Sandbox Escape Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-10924HIGHChrome Integer Overflow Sandbox Escape Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-42916HIGHWindows NT Kernel Integer Overflow Privilege Escalation Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-42974HIGHWindows Performance Monitor Integer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-44812HIGHWindows Win32K Integer Overflow – CVSS 7.8 High Severity
- CVE-2026-45592HIGHWindows Privilege Escalation in wininet.dll (Integer Overflow)
- CVE-2026-45593HIGHWindows SDK Use-After-Free Privilege Escalation
- CVE-2026-47288HIGHWindows Kerberos Integer Overflow Allows Code Execution