HIGH 7.8

CVE-2026-43958: Stack Buffer Overflow in rrdcached

CVE-2026-43958 is a stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability in rrdcached, the caching daemon component of rrdtool (a time-series data storage and graphing tool commonly used in network monitoring and systems management). An attacker with local access to the rrdcached socket can trigger the flaw by sending a specially crafted CREATE request with an oversized payload. Successful exploitation could crash the daemon, causing service disruption, or potentially enable arbitrary code execution with the privileges of the rrdcached process.

Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain

CVSS
3.1 · 7.8 HIGH · CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Weaknesses (CWE)
CWE-121
Affected products
0 configuration(s)
Published / Modified
2026-06-01 / 2026-07-01

NVD description (verbatim)

A flaw was found in rrdcached, a component of rrdtool. A local attacker with access to a rrdcached socket can exploit a stack-based buffer overflow by sending an oversized CREATE request. This vulnerability can lead to a denial of service by crashing the daemon or potentially allow for arbitrary code execution, impacting the integrity and confidentiality of data.

5 reference(s) · View on NVD →

SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source

Technical summary

The vulnerability exists in rrdcached's request handling logic, where insufficient bounds checking on CREATE request payloads allows a stack-based buffer overflow (CWE-121). An attacker with local socket access can write beyond allocated buffer boundaries, overwriting stack memory including return addresses and saved context. This direct memory corruption can be leveraged to achieve denial of service through crash, or to construct ROP chains or shellcode payloads for code execution. The attack surface is limited to local attackers with socket connectivity, but exploitation does not require elevated privileges—a regular unprivileged user with rrdcached socket access can trigger the flaw.

Business impact

Organizations relying on rrdtool's caching layer for time-series metrics collection (including network performance monitoring, server telemetry, and infrastructure alerting) face potential service downtime if an attacker crashes rrdcached. More critically, if arbitrary code execution is achieved, an attacker could read sensitive historical data, modify metrics to mask malicious activity, or pivot to other systems. This is particularly significant in environments where rrdcached runs with service-level privileges and handles operational metrics that feed into security or SLA dashboards.

Affected systems

The vulnerability affects rrdcached components in rrdtool installations. Specific affected versions are not enumerated in available disclosures; vendors and product information was not provided. Organizations should consult rrdtool and distribution-specific security advisories to confirm which versions are vulnerable. Installations where rrdcached is exposed via socket to untrusted local users (containers, multi-tenant systems, or shared hosting) are at elevated risk.

Exploitability

Exploitation requires local socket access to rrdcached, which significantly restricts the attack surface compared to network-facing vulnerabilities. However, exploitability is straightforward once access is gained: an attacker need only craft an oversized CREATE request without special authentication or system conditions. The CVSS vector (AV:L/AC:L/PR:L) reflects low complexity—this is not a race condition or multi-step attack, but a direct trigger. In shared or containerized environments, or where rrdcached sockets are world-readable, risk is elevated. The vulnerability is not currently tracked as actively exploited in the wild (KEV status: not listed).

Remediation

Apply vendor patches to rrdtool and rrdcached as soon as they become available. Verify specific patch versions through official rrdtool security advisories and your distribution's package repositories. In parallel, implement socket access controls: restrict rrdcached socket permissions (chmod 600 or similar) to prevent unauthorized local access, and consider running rrdcached in a restricted container or namespace if feasible. Monitor rrdcached process stability for unexpected crashes or restarts.

Patch guidance

Check rrdtool's official security announcements and your system's package manager (apt, yum, apk, etc.) for patched versions addressing CVE-2026-43958. Verify patch availability through your vendor or distribution's advisory channels before deploying. Once patches are released, prioritize deployment in environments where rrdcached is exposed to multiple local users or runs in multi-tenant settings. Test patches in staging to ensure monitoring continuity.

Detection guidance

Monitor for rrdcached process crashes or unexpected restarts, which may indicate exploitation attempts or successful DoS attacks. Enable process-level monitoring and log aggregation around rrdcached startup/failure events. If available, configure rrdcached with debug or verbose logging to capture malformed requests. Host-based intrusion detection or seccomp filters can flag unusual syscall patterns (segmentation faults, memory access violations) associated with stack corruption. Review socket access logs and audit trail for unexpected connections to rrdcached sockets.

Why prioritize this

This vulnerability merits prompt attention due to its HIGH CVSS score (7.8) and the combination of confidentiality, integrity, and availability impacts. While local-only access limits the immediate attack surface, environments with untrusted local users or shared systems are at real risk. The straightforward exploitation mechanism (no special privileges required, low complexity) means that once an attacker has socket access, triggering the flaw is trivial. Organizations should prioritize patching in multi-tenant or shared infrastructure first, then proceed to standard deployments.

Risk score, explained

The CVSS 3.1 score of 7.8 (HIGH) reflects: local attack vector, low attack complexity, low privilege requirement, no user interaction, unchanged scope, but high impact across confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The stack-based buffer overflow permits both denial of service (availability) and potential code execution (confidentiality and integrity), justifying the maximum impact ratings. The score appropriately discounts the local-only requirement while emphasizing the severity of feasible outcomes.

Frequently asked questions

Can an unprivileged user exploit this, or do I need root?

No, you do not need root. The vulnerability requires only local socket access to rrdcached and can be triggered by any user (uid) with permission to write to that socket. Standard privilege escalation is not necessary for exploitation.

If rrdcached crashes, does it restart automatically?

That depends on how your rrdcached is deployed. If managed by systemd, an init script, or a supervisor (e.g., supervisord), it may restart automatically and minimize downtime. However, any crash is a service disruption. Worse, an attacker could crash it repeatedly or achieve code execution before restart. Patching eliminates the root cause.

Can I simply disable rrdcached to avoid this?

If your monitoring or time-series infrastructure does not depend on rrdcached's caching layer, disabling it is a valid temporary mitigation. However, most deployments rely on rrdcached for performance and data aggregation. Restrictions on socket permissions and access are a more practical interim defense while you await and deploy patches.

What if I run rrdcached in a container or sandbox?

Containerization can limit blast radius: if rrdcached is compromised, the attacker is initially confined to that container. However, containers are not a substitute for patching. An attacker with code execution inside a container may escape to the host via kernel vulnerabilities or misconfigurations. Apply patches as the primary remediation.

This analysis is provided for informational and educational purposes to assist security professionals in risk assessment and remediation planning. It is not a substitute for official vendor advisories, security bulletins, or formal vulnerability disclosures. Organizations must verify patch availability and compatibility within their own environments before deployment. SEC.co makes no warranty regarding the accuracy, completeness, or applicability of this information to any specific system or use case. Consult your vendor's official security documentation and conduct thorough testing in non-production environments prior to any remediation actions. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-07-07. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).