CVE-2026-42911: Windows AFD Use-After-Free Privilege Escalation Vulnerability
A use-after-free memory vulnerability exists in Windows' Ancillary Function Driver for WinSock (AFD.sys). An attacker who already has local access to a machine can exploit this flaw to gain elevated privileges, potentially running code with system-level permissions. The vulnerability requires specific conditions to trigger—it is not trivially exploitable—but once successful grants significant control over the affected system.
Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain
- CVSS
- 3.1 · 7.0 HIGH · CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
- Weaknesses (CWE)
- CWE-416
- Affected products
- 24 configuration(s)
- Published / Modified
- 2026-06-09 / 2026-06-17
NVD description (verbatim)
Use after free in Windows Ancillary Function Driver for WinSock allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.
1 reference(s) · View on NVD →
SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source
Technical summary
CVE-2026-42911 is a use-after-free (CWE-416) memory corruption vulnerability in the Windows Ancillary Function Driver for WinSock (AFD). The flaw allows an authenticated local attacker to craft specific socket operations that reference memory after it has been freed, corrupting the kernel heap. By carefully controlling the timing and sequence of operations, an attacker can manipulate kernel data structures to elevate privilege from a standard user context to SYSTEM. The vulnerability has a CVSS v3.1 score of 7.0 (HIGH) with a vector indicating local attack surface, high complexity, low privilege requirements, no user interaction needed, and impact across confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
Business impact
Privilege escalation vulnerabilities in core Windows components pose significant risk to enterprise security posture. An attacker gaining SYSTEM-level access can install rootkits, disable security controls, exfiltrate sensitive data, or establish persistent backdoors. Organizations relying on user-level application isolation to contain untrusted code face direct compromise. Server deployments are particularly at risk, as compromised servers may grant lateral movement into networked infrastructure and access to centralized data repositories.
Affected systems
Microsoft Windows 10 (versions 1607, 1809, 21H2, 22H2), Windows 11 (versions 23H2, 24H2, 25H2, 26H1), Windows Server 2012, 2016, 2019, 2022, and 2025 are affected. The broad version range underscores the long lifecycle of these systems and the need for systematic patching across heterogeneous Windows deployments. End-of-support versions such as Windows 10 1607 require urgent attention if still in production.
Exploitability
The vulnerability requires the attacker to have already gained local system access (authenticated user account), which means it is not directly exploitable from the network. However, the high complexity flag in the CVSS vector does not prevent reliable exploitation by a skilled attacker with access to detailed technical information. It is not currently listed in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog, but the combination of privilege escalation capability and established attack prerequisites makes it a logical target for post-compromise persistence techniques.
Remediation
Microsoft patches for this vulnerability should be applied via Windows Update or manual download from the Microsoft Security Update Guide. Organizations must verify patch applicability for their specific Windows versions and deployment models. Staggered rollout testing in non-production environments is essential before production deployment to avoid service disruption. Systems unable to be patched immediately should be isolated or have additional compensating controls applied.
Patch guidance
Consult Microsoft's official security bulletin and the Windows Update catalog to identify and deploy the correct patch for your Windows version. Organizations using Windows Server should prioritize patches for 2019, 2022, and 2025 releases. Test patches thoroughly in lab or staging environments, particularly on systems running security-sensitive applications or kernel-mode drivers. Maintain current backups before applying updates. Verify successful patching by confirming the absence of vulnerable AFD.sys versions post-deployment.
Detection guidance
Monitor for suspicious WinSock API calls and AFD driver interactions from non-standard processes or contexts. Look for unusual socket creation, closure, or option-setting sequences that may indicate exploitation attempts. Kernel memory corruption attempts may generate Dr. Watson crash reports or system stability events. Enable ETW (Event Tracing for Windows) logging for process creation and privilege escalation events. Behavioral detection focused on unexpected SYSTEM token assumption from standard user processes can flag successful exploitation. Memory sanitization tools and Application Verifier can assist in lab detection and validation.
Why prioritize this
This vulnerability merits HIGH priority for systems with local user access controls or running multi-tenant workloads where untrusted code execution is possible. Organizations with strong administrative controls (e.g., AppLocker, Windows Defender Application Guard) limiting user-mode code execution may lower tactical urgency slightly, but should not defer patching indefinitely. Privilege escalation flaws in core Windows components are fundamental security risks and should be addressed within standard patch cycles.
Risk score, explained
The CVSS score of 7.0 reflects the combination of high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact balanced against the requirement for local access and high exploitation complexity. The flaw is not a remote code execution vector but represents critical post-compromise capability. Organizations should treat this as a mandatory patch candidate rather than an optional security improvement.
Frequently asked questions
Can this vulnerability be exploited remotely?
No. The vulnerability requires the attacker to already have local authenticated access to the target system. Network-based exploitation is not possible. However, it represents a serious risk if an attacker gains initial user-level access through other means (e.g., phishing, software supply chain compromise, or legitimate user credentials).
Which Windows versions are most critical to patch first?
Windows Server 2022 and 2025 should be prioritized in most enterprises, as servers typically manage critical infrastructure and data. Windows 11 versions (especially 24H2 and later) in corporate environments should follow. Legacy versions like Windows 10 1607 and Windows Server 2012 must also be addressed, but may have extended timelines for end-of-support systems.
Are there workarounds if I cannot patch immediately?
Temporary mitigations include disabling WinSock features where operationally feasible, restricting local user logon rights, applying AppLocker policies to limit user process execution, and enforcing multi-factor authentication for administrative access. However, these are not substitutes for patching and should be viewed as interim measures only.
Is this vulnerability actively being exploited in the wild?
The vulnerability is not currently listed in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog as of the publication date. However, the technical characteristics and privilege escalation capability make it an attractive target for sophisticated threat actors, so vigilance and timely patching remain critical.
This analysis is provided for informational purposes and reflects publicly available vulnerability information as of June 2026. Patch versions and specific mitigation steps should be verified against official Microsoft security advisories and your vendor's guidance. SEC.co does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of vulnerability intelligence. Organizations should conduct independent risk assessments and testing before deploying patches in production environments. This explainer does not constitute security advice for any specific organization or system configuration. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-07-15. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).
Related vulnerabilities
- CVE-2026-10000HIGHChrome Sandbox Escape via Use-After-Free in Password Handling
- CVE-2026-10001HIGHChrome Sandbox Escape via PerformanceManager Use-After-Free
- CVE-2026-10002HIGHGoogle Chrome PDFium Use-After-Free Vulnerability (CVSS 8.8)
- CVE-2026-10003HIGHChrome Use-After-Free Code Execution Vulnerability Analysis
- CVE-2026-10007HIGHChrome Use-After-Free in SVG Arbitrary Code Execution (CVSS 8.8)
- CVE-2026-10012HIGHChrome Skia Use-After-Free Sandbox Escape (v148.0.7778.216)
- CVE-2026-10013HIGHUse-After-Free in Chrome WebCodecs – Patch Guide & Risk Assessment
- CVE-2026-10016HIGHUse-After-Free in Chrome DOM – Sandbox Code Execution Vulnerability