CVE-2026-42014: GnuTLS Use-After-Free in PKCS#11 PIN Management
GnuTLS, a widely-used cryptographic library, contains a use-after-free memory bug in its PIN management function. When an attacker attempts to change a Security Officer PIN on a hardware token that doesn't have protected authentication safeguards, the library incorrectly handles memory, potentially allowing local attackers to crash the service or manipulate sensitive cryptographic operations. This vulnerability requires local access and elevated privileges to exploit, making it primarily a risk in multi-tenant or shared-access environments.
Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain
- CVSS
- 3.1 · 6.6 MEDIUM · CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
- Weaknesses (CWE)
- CWE-825
- Affected products
- 0 configuration(s)
- Published / Modified
- 2026-06-16 / 2026-07-22
NVD description (verbatim)
A flaw was found in GnuTLS. The `gnutls_pkcs11_token_set_pin` function, used for changing the Security Officer PIN, can lead to a use-after-free vulnerability. This occurs when an attacker attempts to change the PIN with a NULL old PIN for a token that lacks a protected authentication path.
18 reference(s) · View on NVD →
SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source
Technical summary
CVE-2026-42014 is a use-after-free vulnerability (CWE-825) in GnuTLS's `gnutls_pkcs11_token_set_pin` function. The flaw manifests when an attacker provides a NULL old PIN value during PIN change operations on a PKCS#11 token lacking a protected authentication path. The memory management failure allows freed memory to be accessed, potentially leading to information disclosure, data corruption, or denial of service. The vulnerability requires local system access and user-level privileges to trigger.
Business impact
Organizations relying on GnuTLS for cryptographic operations—particularly those managing hardware security modules (HSMs) or smartcards—face potential service disruption and data integrity risks. While the attack surface is constrained to local, authenticated users, compromised PIN management could weaken the security posture of certificate authorities, key management systems, and other PKI-dependent infrastructure. The MEDIUM severity rating reflects this localized but meaningful threat to availability and confidentiality.
Affected systems
GnuTLS versions prior to the patch are affected. This impacts applications and services that use GnuTLS to manage PKCS#11 tokens, including OpenVPN deployments, mail servers with certificate-based authentication, VPN clients, and PKI tooling. Systems without hardware tokens or those using protected authentication paths are at lower immediate risk. Verify the specific affected version range against the GnuTLS security advisory.
Exploitability
Exploitation requires local access to the system and user-level privileges—a significant barrier for remote attackers. The attack is deterministic once access is gained: an attacker must invoke the PIN-change operation with a NULL old PIN on a non-protected token. No network interaction or user interaction is needed once local execution is possible. The CVSS vector (AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N) reflects this local-only, low-complexity attack surface.
Remediation
Apply the latest GnuTLS patch from the vendor immediately for systems managing cryptographic tokens or HSMs. For environments unable to patch promptly, restrict local system access through user privilege separation and process isolation, disable PKCS#11 token functionality if operationally feasible, and monitor for abnormal process crashes or HSM error logs. Verify patch compatibility with dependent applications (OpenVPN, mail servers, etc.) before production deployment.
Patch guidance
Check the official GnuTLS security advisory for the specific patched version addressing CVE-2026-42014. Test the patch in a staging environment with your PKCS#11 token hardware and applications before rolling out to production. Coordinate with teams managing VPN infrastructure, certificate services, or HSM-dependent systems to align deployment timing. Document the patch version applied for compliance and future reference.
Detection guidance
Monitor system logs for segmentation faults or memory access errors in processes linked to GnuTLS, particularly those handling PKCS#11 operations. Watch for repeated failed PIN-change attempts in HSM or smartcard logs. Use tools like AddressSanitizer or Valgrind in development environments to catch use-after-free errors. Check running process versions with tools like `ldd` to confirm GnuTLS library versions in use.
Why prioritize this
While rated MEDIUM severity, this vulnerability should be prioritized for patches in any environment managing HSMs, smartcards, or PKI infrastructure. The use-after-free nature carries inherent unpredictability; exploitation could lead to larger system compromise in rare cases. Organizations with multi-user access to cryptographic infrastructure should treat this as HIGH priority due to insider threat potential.
Risk score, explained
The CVSS 3.1 score of 6.6 reflects a vulnerability with localized attack surface (local access required, user privileges sufficient) but significant impact on availability and confidentiality. The score appropriately penalizes the use-after-free class of flaw, which can have cascading effects even with limited initial access. However, the score should be elevated contextually by organizations for which HSM availability is business-critical.
Frequently asked questions
Does this affect my system if I don't use PKCS#11 tokens or hardware security modules?
Likely not. If your GnuTLS deployment does not interact with PKCS#11 tokens (smartcards, HSMs, security keys), this vulnerability is not exploitable. However, verify your application's PKCS#11 usage. Some VPN clients and mail servers enable it by default.
Can this be exploited remotely?
No. CVE-2026-42014 requires local system access and user-level privileges to trigger. Remote attackers cannot exploit this directly, but compromised local accounts or insider threats can.
What is a 'protected authentication path' and does my token have one?
A protected authentication path provides cryptographic assurance that PIN entry happens securely (typically on the token hardware itself rather than through the host system). Most consumer smartcards and some HSMs implement this. Hardware lacking this protection is more vulnerable to this flaw. Consult your token vendor's documentation.
If I update GnuTLS, do I need to update other applications?
In most cases, no. GnuTLS is a shared library; updating the library alone typically fixes dependent applications (OpenVPN, mail servers, etc.). However, test in staging first, as edge cases involving library incompatibility are rare but possible.
This analysis is based on publicly available vulnerability data and vendor disclosures as of the publication date. The specific affected GnuTLS versions, patch versions, and remediation steps must be verified against the official GnuTLS security advisory and your organization's security scanning tools. Use-after-free vulnerabilities can behave unpredictably; defense-in-depth measures (least privilege, process isolation, monitoring) are essential. SEC.co makes no guarantee of completeness or accuracy and recommends independent validation by your security team. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-07-23. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).
Weaknesses (CWE)
Related vulnerabilities
- CVE-2026-46523MEDIUMImageMagick Heap-Use-After-Free in MSL Processing
- CVE-2026-12291HIGHFirefox & Thunderbird HTTP Use-After-Free RCE (CVSS 8.8)
- CVE-2026-12326HIGHCritical Memory Safety Flaws in Firefox & Thunderbird 151 – Patch Guide
- CVE-2026-12328HIGHCritical Firefox & Thunderbird Memory Safety Vulnerability (CVSS 8.1)
- CVE-2026-44422HIGHFreeRDP RDPEAR Double-Free Vulnerability (HIGH Severity)
- CVE-2026-45447HIGHOpenSSL PKCS#7 Use-After-Free Leading to RCE
- CVE-2026-46125HIGHLinux Kernel WiFi Driver Memory Safety Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-46166HIGHLinux Kernel mac80211 Use-After-Free in DFS Radar Detection