CVE-2026-41982 IPC Race Condition Vulnerability: CVSS 6.4 Medium Risk
CVE-2026-41982 is a race condition vulnerability affecting the IPC (inter-process communication) module. An authenticated attacker can exploit this flaw to degrade system availability. The vulnerability requires specific conditions to trigger and is rated MEDIUM severity with a CVSS score of 6.4.
Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain
- CVSS
- 3.1 · 6.4 MEDIUM · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L
- Weaknesses (CWE)
- CWE-416
- Affected products
- 0 configuration(s)
- Published / Modified
- 2026-06-09 / 2026-06-17
NVD description (verbatim)
Race condition vulnerability in the IPC module. Impact: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may affect availability.
2 reference(s) · View on NVD →
SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source
Technical summary
This vulnerability stems from a race condition in the IPC module, classified under CWE-416 (use-after-free). The race condition occurs in a sequence of operations where timing-dependent state changes can lead to memory safety violations. Successful exploitation requires network access and valid credentials, but does not require user interaction. The attack surface is limited by the requirement for prior authentication and challenging exploitation conditions (AC:H), which collectively mitigate the overall risk despite the underlying memory corruption primitive.
Business impact
Availability impact is the primary concern. An authenticated user or lateral-moving threat actor could trigger this race condition to disrupt IPC-dependent services, potentially affecting dependent applications and workflows. Confidentiality and integrity impacts are lower severity. For organizations relying on high-availability IPC-heavy infrastructure, this represents a medium-priority availability risk rather than a critical data loss or system compromise threat.
Affected systems
The vulnerability exists in the IPC module; specific products and versions are not disclosed in current public documentation. Organizations should consult vendor advisories and product release notes to determine affected configurations. Systems allowing authenticated network access to IPC services are the primary exposure vector.
Exploitability
Exploitation requires network access, valid authentication credentials, and precise timing to trigger the race condition. The AC:H (high attack complexity) constraint indicates that successful exploitation is not trivial—the attacker must craft and execute specific sequences under narrow timing windows. Public exploit code is not yet widely available, and the authentication requirement limits opportunistic exploitation.
Remediation
Apply patches from your IPC module vendor as they become available. Until patching is possible, restrict network access to IPC services through firewall rules and authentication controls. Monitor for suspicious authenticated connections attempting multiple rapid IPC operations, which may indicate exploitation attempts. Consider segmenting systems with strict IPC access policies where feasible.
Patch guidance
Check your vendor's security advisory for updated IPC module versions. Vendors typically address race conditions through synchronization improvements, lock refinement, or state-management refactoring. Verify patch applicability against your deployment configuration before deployment, and test in a staging environment to confirm no operational regression. Prioritize patching in environments where IPC availability is mission-critical.
Detection guidance
Look for patterns of rapid successive IPC calls from authenticated users, particularly those followed by service instability or crashes. Monitor system logs and IPC-level diagnostics for unexpected state transitions or deadlock indicators. Track authentication anomalies that precede IPC-related failures. Performance degradation or intermittent availability of IPC-dependent services after specific user actions can signal exploitation attempts.
Why prioritize this
Although rated MEDIUM severity, this vulnerability merits prompt attention for organizations operating availability-critical IPC infrastructure. The authentication requirement and high attack complexity reduce the threat from mass exploitation, but race conditions are notoriously difficult to exploit reliably and can be triggered accidentally under load. Prioritization depends on your IPC service dependencies and baseline authentication hygiene.
Risk score, explained
The CVSS 6.4 MEDIUM rating reflects the combination of network accessibility, confidentiality impact, and integrity/availability degradation, offset by the authentication requirement and high attack complexity. The CWE-416 use-after-free primitive could theoretically enable code execution, but the vector suggests the primary impact is availability and limited information disclosure. Organizations with defense-in-depth controls on authenticated access can tolerate this risk longer than those with open network access to IPC services.
Frequently asked questions
Does this vulnerability require user interaction to exploit?
No. Exploitation does not require user interaction (UI:N in the CVSS vector). An authenticated attacker can trigger the race condition directly through network calls to the IPC module.
Is this vulnerability currently being exploited in the wild?
CVE-2026-41982 is not listed in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog, indicating no evidence of active exploitation in the wild at this time. However, race condition vulnerabilities can be discovered and exploited opportunistically, so timely patching remains important.
What is the difference between this race condition and other IPC vulnerabilities?
Race conditions are uniquely challenging because they depend on precise timing and system state. Unlike memory corruption flaws with deterministic triggers, race conditions may manifest inconsistently, making them harder to detect and reproduce. This is reflected in the AC:H (high attack complexity) rating.
Should we block all IPC access at the network level?
Not necessarily. If IPC is essential to your operations, blocking network access may break functionality. Instead, implement strict authentication controls, network segmentation, and access logging. Patch systems as updates become available and monitor IPC traffic for anomalies.
This analysis is based on publicly disclosed vulnerability information current as of June 2026. Specific affected products, vendors, and patch versions are not confirmed in the source data; consult official vendor security advisories for authoritative details. Race condition vulnerabilities can be difficult to reproduce and may have additional impacts beyond those documented in initial disclosures. This guidance should inform, not replace, your organization's risk assessment and incident response protocols. Always test patches in non-production environments before deployment. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-07-15. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).
Weaknesses (CWE)
Related vulnerabilities
- CVE-2025-60486MEDIUMHeap Use-After-Free in GPAC MP4Box MPEG-2 Dasher – DoS Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-10232MEDIUMAssimp Use-After-Free in ASE Parser (CVSS 5.3)
- CVE-2026-10703MEDIUMUse-After-Free in EIPStackGroup OpENer Remote Code Execution Risk
- CVE-2026-11073MEDIUMChrome WebGL Use-After-Free Information Disclosure
- CVE-2026-11208MEDIUMUse-After-Free in Chrome Codecs – Information Disclosure Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-11249MEDIUMChrome Use-After-Free Information Disclosure Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-11623MEDIUMUse-After-Free in tmux 3.6a Image Handling – MEDIUM Severity
- CVE-2026-11628MEDIUMChrome Use-After-Free in Ozone (Local Heap Corruption)