MEDIUM 6.5

CVE-2026-4096: IBM DevOps Plan HTTP Header Injection Vulnerability – CVSS 6.5

IBM DevOps Plan versions 3.0.0 through 3.0.6 contain a flaw in how they validate HTTP HOST headers, allowing attackers to inject malicious header content. This could lead to several attack vectors including stealing user session data, poisoning cached content, or executing code in users' browsers through cross-site scripting (XSS). The vulnerability requires network access but no authentication or user interaction to exploit.

Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain

CVSS
3.1 · 6.5 MEDIUM · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Weaknesses (CWE)
CWE-644
Affected products
1 configuration(s)
Published / Modified
2026-06-11 / 2026-06-17

NVD description (verbatim)

IBM DevOps Plan 3.0.0 through 3.0.6 is vulnerable to HTTP header injection, caused by improper validation of input by the HOST headers. This could allow an attacker to conduct various attacks against the vulnerable system, including cross-site scripting, cache poisoning or session hijacking

1 reference(s) · View on NVD →

SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source

Technical summary

CVE-2026-4096 is an HTTP header injection vulnerability (CWE-644) in IBM DevOps Plan that stems from insufficient input validation on HOST headers. The improper handling of user-supplied header data allows attackers to inject arbitrary content into HTTP responses or headers. This enables cache poisoning (where malicious content is stored by intermediary caches), session hijacking (by manipulating session-related headers), and reflected XSS attacks. The vulnerability affects all instances of the 3.0.x branch from version 3.0.0 to 3.0.6 inclusive.

Business impact

The primary business risk is reputational and operational. Cache poisoning could serve malicious content to many users before detection. Session hijacking threatens user account security and data confidentiality. XSS exploitation could redirect users to phishing sites or steal credentials. DevOps Plan often manages infrastructure automation and deployment workflows; compromise could cascade to downstream systems. Organizations relying on this platform for CI/CD pipelines face disrupted deployments and potential lateral movement into production environments.

Affected systems

IBM DevOps Plan 3.0.0, 3.0.1, 3.0.2, 3.0.3, 3.0.4, 3.0.5, and 3.0.6 are vulnerable. Organizations running DevOps Plan in this version range should assume exposure. Version 3.0.7 and later, as well as different major versions, require verification against IBM's advisory for confirmation of patching status.

Exploitability

The vulnerability is highly exploitable. It requires only network access and no authentication or user interaction. An attacker can craft malicious HTTP requests with injected headers targeting any instance of the vulnerable software. The barrier to exploitation is low; standard web attack tools and techniques suffice. However, the impact depends on how the injected headers are reflected or stored—internal deployments or those behind web application firewalls may face lower practical risk.

Remediation

Organizations should immediately upgrade to a patched version beyond 3.0.6. Consult IBM's official security advisory for the specific version addressing this issue. Pending patching, deploy web application firewalls (WAFs) configured to validate and sanitize HTTP HOST headers, restrict the HOST header values accepted by DevOps Plan, and implement strict input validation rules that reject malformed or suspicious header content.

Patch guidance

Contact IBM support or review the official security bulletin for CVE-2026-4096 to obtain the appropriate patch version for your DevOps Plan deployment. Patches are typically available as point releases; do not skip intermediate versions if prerequisites exist. Test patches in a non-production environment before deploying to live systems. Verify patch application by confirming the installed version and checking that header injection attacks are no longer possible.

Detection guidance

Monitor HTTP traffic to DevOps Plan instances for unusual HOST header values, such as those containing special characters, multiple hosts, or injection payloads (e.g., newlines, carriage returns, or XSS patterns). Log analysis should flag requests with mismatched HOST headers or anomalous values. Web application firewalls and intrusion detection systems can be tuned to detect header injection attempts. Check access logs for requests attempting to poison caches or establish unauthorized sessions.

Why prioritize this

Although rated MEDIUM severity (CVSS 6.5), this vulnerability merits prompt attention because HTTP header injection is easily exploitable, requires no special privileges, and can trigger multiple downstream attacks including cache poisoning and session theft. DevOps tools are high-value targets for attackers seeking supply-chain compromise or lateral movement. The wide version range (3.0.0–3.0.6) suggests many organizations may be affected. Rapid patching limits the attack window.

Risk score, explained

The CVSS 3.1 score of 6.5 (MEDIUM) reflects: network-accessible attack vector (AV:N), low attack complexity (AC:L), no authentication required (PR:N), no user interaction needed (UI:N), unchanged scope (S:U), and low impact on confidentiality and integrity but no availability impact (C:L/I:L/A:N). The score appropriately captures the ease of exploitation and the real but non-catastrophic impact. However, contextual risk is elevated for organizations where DevOps Plan is critical to CI/CD pipelines or sits in a trusted zone.

Frequently asked questions

What is HTTP header injection and why is it dangerous?

HTTP header injection occurs when an application fails to properly validate user input that becomes part of HTTP response headers. Attackers exploit this by injecting newlines or other delimiters to add malicious headers or content. This can lead to cache poisoning (tricking caches into serving malicious content), session hijacking (stealing or manipulating session cookies), and reflected XSS (executing scripts in the victim's browser). The danger is multiplied when the application sits between users and cached content or session management systems.

Do I need to upgrade immediately if I'm running DevOps Plan 3.0.x?

Yes. If your instance is between 3.0.0 and 3.0.6, plan an urgent upgrade. The low attack complexity and lack of authentication requirement mean attackers can probe and exploit without special access. While the CVSS is MEDIUM, the practical risk to DevOps infrastructure is substantial. Prioritize patching within your change management window, typically within 1–2 weeks for medium-severity flaws in critical tools.

Can a WAF fully protect me until I patch?

A web application firewall can significantly reduce risk by blocking malformed HOST headers and injection patterns, but it is not a complete replacement for patching. WAF rules may have false positives or gaps, and determined attackers may find bypasses. WAF protection is best viewed as a temporary mitigation while you plan and execute the upgrade. Always pursue the patch as the primary remediation.

Is this vulnerability being actively exploited in the wild?

This CVE is not currently listed on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog, which suggests no confirmed active exploitation at the time of publication. However, the ease of exploitation means threat actors may develop and use exploits opportunistically. Do not assume lack of KEV status means safety; treat it as a window to patch before widespread exploitation begins.

This analysis is for informational purposes and reflects publicly available data as of the publication date. Security vulnerabilities may be updated or corrected; always verify information against official vendor advisories and security bulletins from IBM. Patch versions, workarounds, and remediation timelines are subject to change. Organizations should conduct their own risk assessments and consult with IBM support for guidance specific to their deployment. No exploit code or weaponized attack details are provided; this analysis is intended to support defensive security decisions. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-07-20. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).