MEDIUM 4.8

CVE-2026-40210: SetMacAddrAction Out-of-Bounds Read

CVE-2026-40210 is a medium-severity vulnerability affecting the SetMacAddrAction function. When this action is invoked, a flaw in memory boundary checking can allow the software to read beyond allocated memory, potentially exposing uninitialized data that may be transmitted over the network or causing the application to crash. The vulnerability requires specific conditions to exploit but does not demand special privileges or user interaction.

Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain

CVSS
3.1 · 4.8 MEDIUM · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
Weaknesses (CWE)
CWE-126
Affected products
0 configuration(s)
Published / Modified
2026-06-25 / 2026-06-25

NVD description (verbatim)

An out-of-bounds read might happen when SetMacAddrAction is used, potentially resulting in uninitialized memory being sent over the network or a crash.

1 reference(s) · View on NVD →

SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source

Technical summary

This vulnerability is classified as an out-of-bounds read (CWE-126) in the SetMacAddrAction code path. The flaw stems from insufficient bounds validation when accessing memory regions, allowing an attacker to read data from memory locations outside the intended buffer. This can result in information disclosure of uninitialized or sensitive memory contents sent across the network, or in denial of service via application crash. The CVSS 3.1 score of 4.8 reflects low impact on confidentiality and availability, with network-based attack vector and high attack complexity.

Business impact

Depending on the affected product and deployment context, this vulnerability could lead to two primary business concerns: (1) Confidential information leakage if uninitialized memory containing session tokens, configuration data, or other sensitive details is exfiltrated; (2) Service disruption through application crashes affecting network-dependent operations. Since the attack vector is network-based and requires high complexity, the real-world impact is likely contained to specific use cases or misconfigured deployments rather than widespread exploitation.

Affected systems

The vendor and product information for this vulnerability has not yet been disclosed in the available source data. Organizations should monitor vendor security advisories and product documentation to determine whether systems in their environment are affected. Check with your equipment manufacturers and software vendors for affected version details and product applicability.

Exploitability

Exploitation requires network access and high attack complexity, meaning an attacker must craft specific conditions or sequences to trigger the out-of-bounds read. The vulnerability does not require authentication or user interaction, making it theoretically reachable from the network perimeter. However, the high complexity barrier significantly limits the practical exploitability window; widespread automated attacks are unlikely without a functional, reliable exploit. The vulnerability is not currently listed in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.

Remediation

Remediation depends on the affected vendor and product. Organizations should: (1) Identify which systems use the affected component; (2) Contact the vendor for available patches or workarounds; (3) Implement network segmentation to limit exposure of vulnerable services if patching is delayed; (4) Monitor for unexpected crashes or anomalous memory access patterns. Once patches are released, validate them in a non-production environment before deployment.

Patch guidance

Patch availability and version specifics must be obtained from the vendor advisory corresponding to your affected product. Do not assume patch versions from generic CVE data; verify directly with the vendor or through your organization's vulnerability management system. Apply patches promptly once validated, prioritizing systems that expose SetMacAddrAction to untrusted network input.

Detection guidance

Detection strategies should focus on behavioral indicators: (1) Monitor application logs for crashes or abnormal termination related to SetMacAddrAction; (2) Use network intrusion detection to identify suspicious patterns attempting to trigger memory errors; (3) Enable memory-protection features (ASLR, DEP/NX) on systems running the vulnerable code; (4) Review packet captures for unusual data in network transmissions that might indicate uninitialized memory leakage. Endpoint detection and response (EDR) tools can flag unexpected memory access violations.

Why prioritize this

With a CVSS score of 4.8 and medium severity, this vulnerability should be addressed in a measured, prioritized manner rather than treated as an emergency. It is not on the CISA KEV list and carries moderate exploit barriers. Prioritize patching for systems that: (1) expose SetMacAddrAction to untrusted networks; (2) handle sensitive data in the same process; (3) have limited restart tolerance. Organizations with robust segmentation and lower-risk deployments may safely defer remediation pending patch availability, while internet-facing or critical-path systems warrant faster response.

Risk score, explained

The CVSS 3.1 base score of 4.8 (MEDIUM) reflects: (1) Network attack vector—the flaw is reachable remotely; (2) High attack complexity—triggering the out-of-bounds read requires non-trivial conditions; (3) Low confidentiality impact—uninitialized memory disclosure is possible but often low-value; (4) Low availability impact—crashes are possible but not guaranteed or widespread. The score appropriately captures a vulnerability that is serious enough to patch but unlikely to drive immediate incident response for most organizations.

Frequently asked questions

Is my organization at risk if I don't know which products use SetMacAddrAction?

You should assume potential risk until you have confirmed that no affected components are deployed in your environment. Contact your vendors for product applicability. Check your asset inventory against the eventual vendor advisory, and segment any potentially vulnerable systems from untrusted network sources in the interim.

What is the difference between this vulnerability and a full-scale memory leak?

This is an out-of-bounds read rather than a controlled leak. The attacker cannot reliably select which memory is read or guarantee useful data will be exposed; instead, uninitialized or adjacent memory is accessed unpredictably. This increases the complexity of exploitation but does not eliminate risk, especially in multi-process or shared-memory environments.

Should I wait for CISA to add this to the KEV catalog before acting?

No. The KEV catalog tracks vulnerabilities with evidence of active exploitation, but absence from the list does not mean the vulnerability is safe. Patch according to your organization's risk-based remediation schedule and based on your exposure to vulnerable systems.

Can I detect exploitation attempts in real time with signature-based detection?

Signature-based detection is limited because the exploit conditions are complex and system-dependent. Behavioral detection (monitoring crashes, anomalous memory access, and unexpected network data) is more effective. EDR tools with memory-protection enforcement offer better visibility than network-only sensors.

This analysis is provided for informational purposes and reflects the state of disclosed vulnerability data as of the publication date. Vendor and product details are not yet publicly available; refer to official vendor security advisories for definitive affected version lists and patch information. CVSS scores and severity ratings are based on CVSS 3.1 base metrics and do not account for environmental factors specific to your organization. SEC.co does not provide exploit code or weaponized proof-of-concept details. Organizations should conduct their own risk assessments and consult with vendors for remediation timelines and support. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-08-03. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).