CVE-2026-39478: PHP Object Injection in Anti-Malware Security and Brute-Force Firewall Plugin
A PHP Object Injection vulnerability has been discovered in the Anti-Malware Security and Brute-Force Firewall plugin affecting versions up to and including 4.23.87. This flaw allows authenticated users with contributor-level permissions to inject malicious PHP objects, potentially leading to unauthorized code execution, data theft, or system compromise. The vulnerability requires login access but does not need user interaction once authenticated, making it a credible risk in multi-user or compromised-account scenarios.
Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain
- CVSS
- 3.1 · 8.8 HIGH · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
- Weaknesses (CWE)
- CWE-502
- Affected products
- 0 configuration(s)
- Published / Modified
- 2026-06-15 / 2026-06-17
NVD description (verbatim)
Contributor PHP Object Injection in Anti-Malware Security and Brute-Force Firewall <= 4.23.87 versions.
1 reference(s) · View on NVD →
SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source
Technical summary
CVE-2026-39478 is a PHP Object Injection vulnerability (CWE-502) in the Anti-Malware Security and Brute-Force Firewall plugin through version 4.23.87. The vulnerability stems from improper handling of unserialized PHP objects, allowing an authenticated contributor to craft and inject malicious serialized objects. When these objects are deserialized by the application, they can trigger arbitrary code execution through PHP's magic methods or existing gadget chains. The attack vector is network-based, requires low complexity to exploit, and demands only valid contributor credentials—a privilege level commonly assigned to authors or editors in WordPress environments.
Business impact
Organizations using this plugin face risk of complete application compromise via authenticated attackers, including employees or contractors with contributor access. Potential consequences include installation of persistent backdoors, exfiltration of sensitive data (customer records, configuration secrets, database credentials), modification of website content, and lateral movement into backend systems. In multi-tenant environments or when contributor accounts are shared, exposure expands significantly. The combination of high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact means this vulnerability can result in regulatory violations, reputational damage, and operational disruption.
Affected systems
The Anti-Malware Security and Brute-Force Firewall plugin in all versions up to and including 4.23.87 is affected. This plugin is commonly deployed on WordPress sites for security hardening. Organizations should inventory current plugin versions across all WordPress installations to determine exposure. The vulnerability does not affect versions released after 4.23.87, pending verification of the vendor's patching timeline.
Exploitability
Exploitation is straightforward for attackers with valid contributor credentials. No user interaction is required, and the attack surface is directly accessible via the plugin's unserialization code path. The low complexity combined with authenticated access means exploitation can be weaponized quickly once credentials are obtained or if a contributor account is compromised. Active exploitation is not currently tracked in public exploit databases, but the simplicity of PHP deserialization attacks suggests proof-of-concept development is trivial for competent attackers.
Remediation
Update the Anti-Malware Security and Brute-Force Firewall plugin to a version released after 4.23.87 that addresses the object injection flaw. Simultaneously, audit and restrict contributor role assignments to trusted users only; implement role-based access control to minimize the number of users with plugin-modification or content-publishing permissions. Monitor for suspicious serialized object patterns in logs and review recent changes made by contributor accounts. Consider applying Web Application Firewall (WAF) rules to detect or block serialized PHP object patterns in request payloads as a temporary compensating control.
Patch guidance
Verify the vendor's security advisory for the exact patched version number and release date. Once available, prioritize plugin updates within your change management process—test updates in a staging environment first to confirm compatibility with your WordPress configuration and other active plugins. For instances where immediate patching is not feasible, disable or remove the plugin if not mission-critical; if critical, implement IP-based access restrictions to the WordPress admin interface and monitor for exploitation indicators. Check your WordPress update notification system to ensure automatic updates are enabled or configure manual review schedules.
Detection guidance
Monitor web server and application logs for serialized PHP object patterns (strings beginning with 'O:', 'C:', or containing base64-encoded object notation) in HTTP requests to the plugin's endpoints. Enable logging of plugin activity and inspect for unexpected deserialization calls or object instantiation. Use file integrity monitoring on the plugin directory to detect unauthorized modifications. Implement endpoint detection and response (EDR) or SIEM rules alerting on suspicious process spawning or PHP execution from the web server process. Review access logs for unusual contributor-level API calls or administrative actions not typical of your user base.
Why prioritize this
This vulnerability warrants immediate remediation due to its high CVSS score (8.8), requiring only authenticated access and offering multiple paths to system compromise. Unlike vulnerabilities requiring specific conditions, object injection is a well-understood attack pattern with readily adaptable exploitation techniques. The presence of valid but untrusted contributor accounts in many WordPress environments increases real-world risk. Combined with the lack of complex prerequisites for exploitation, this should be prioritized alongside critical patches for your organization's patch cycle.
Risk score, explained
The CVSS 3.1 score of 8.8 (HIGH) reflects a network-accessible vulnerability with low attack complexity, requiring only user privileges (contributor role). The vector CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H indicates high impact across confidentiality, integrity, and availability—all systems within the plugin's scope can be fully compromised. The absence of user interaction and unscopedimpact (unchanged scope) further elevate the severity. This scoring appropriately reflects the practical risk: a single compromised or malicious contributor account can lead to total application takeover.
Frequently asked questions
Do we need to be running WordPress to be affected?
Yes, this vulnerability is specific to the Anti-Malware Security and Brute-Force Firewall plugin, which is designed for WordPress. If your organization does not use WordPress or does not have this plugin installed, you are not directly affected. However, verify your complete plugin inventory to confirm absence of this component.
What if we have contributor accounts but don't actively use them?
Unused contributor accounts still present a security risk if not removed. Abandoned or forgotten accounts can be compromised through credential reuse, phishing, or social engineering. Conduct an access review and remove or disable contributor accounts that are no longer required. If retention is necessary for audit purposes, document the reasons and implement stronger authentication controls such as multi-factor authentication.
Can this vulnerability be exploited without knowing a contributor's password?
The vulnerability itself requires valid contributor credentials to trigger. However, exploitation becomes possible if a contributor account is compromised through separate means (phishing, weak passwords, credential leaks, or lateral movement from another breach). This reinforces the importance of strong access controls, password policies, and monitoring for credential compromise indicators.
Is there a temporary workaround if we cannot patch immediately?
Yes. Restrict network access to your WordPress admin interface to trusted IP ranges or VPNs, reduce the number of active contributor accounts to only essential personnel, enforce multi-factor authentication for all privileged accounts, and disable the plugin entirely if it is not actively required. These are compensating controls only and should not be considered permanent solutions; patches must be applied as soon as practicable.
This analysis is provided for informational purposes to assist security professionals in risk assessment and remediation planning. SEC.co does not guarantee the accuracy of vendor patch timelines or version numbers; verify all remediation steps against official vendor security advisories before deployment. Organizations must conduct their own risk assessment, testing, and validation in staging environments prior to applying patches or significant configuration changes. This vulnerability analysis does not constitute legal or compliance advice; consult your legal and compliance teams regarding regulatory reporting obligations. All information is current as of the publication date; monitor vendor communications for updates or revisions to patch guidance. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-07-23. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).
Weaknesses (CWE)
Related vulnerabilities
- CVE-2025-11993HIGHWooCommerce Infinite Scroll Plugin PHP Object Injection – HIGH Severity
- CVE-2026-12191HIGHOpenpilot 0.11 Unsafe Pickle Deserialization – LOCAL RCE
- CVE-2026-20251HIGHSplunk Remote Code Execution via KV Store Deserialization
- CVE-2026-24221HIGHNVIDIA NVTabular Deserialization Vulnerability – Patch & Detection Guide
- CVE-2026-24228HIGHNVIDIA NeMo Deserialization Code Execution Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-24237HIGHNVIDIA NVTabular Deserialization Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-25551HIGHBarTender 2021–12.0.1 Insecure Deserialization Privilege Escalation
- CVE-2026-27333HIGHUnauthenticated RCE in Paid Videochat Turnkey Site