CVE-2026-38891: ROS gazebo_plugins Denial of Service via Malformed Twist Message
CVE-2026-38891 is a denial-of-service vulnerability in gazebo_plugins version 3.9.0, specifically in the differential drive controller component. An attacker can crash or hang a ROS-based robot system by sending a specially crafted motion command message. The vulnerability stems from insufficient validation of incoming command data, allowing malformed input to trigger a crash condition. No authentication is required; any network-accessible ROS system running the affected code is at risk.
Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain
- CVSS
- 3.1 · 7.5 HIGH · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
- Weaknesses (CWE)
- CWE-20
- Affected products
- 0 configuration(s)
- Published / Modified
- 2026-07-01 / 2026-07-02
NVD description (verbatim)
An improper input validation in the gazebo_ros_diff_drive.cpp component of gazebo_plugins v3.9.0 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via supplying a crafted geometry_msgs::Twist message.
2 reference(s) · View on NVD →
SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source
Technical summary
The gazebo_ros_diff_drive.cpp component fails to properly validate geometry_msgs::Twist messages before processing them. This CWE-20 (improper input validation) flaw allows an attacker to supply a crafted Twist message—which normally specifies linear and angular velocity commands for a differential-drive robot—that causes the component to enter an invalid state or consume excessive resources, resulting in a denial of service. The vulnerability is reachable over the network from any endpoint that can publish to ROS topics without authentication constraints.
Business impact
In production robotics deployments, this vulnerability can disrupt autonomous vehicle operations, manufacturing automation, or mobile robotic systems relying on gazebo_plugins for simulation or control. A successful attack causes the affected component to become unresponsive, potentially halting robot motion and downstream dependent processes. For organizations operating fleets of ROS-based robots or using this library in critical control loops, this represents availability risk that could impact operational continuity and safety-dependent workflows.
Affected systems
gazebo_plugins version 3.9.0 is confirmed affected. The vulnerability resides in the differential drive controller, meaning any ROS system using this specific library version with the gazebo_ros_diff_drive plugin enabled is at risk. This includes simulation environments and real robotic systems that leverage the Gazebo physics engine integration via ROS plugins.
Exploitability
The CVSS 3.1 score of 7.5 (HIGH) reflects the combination of network accessibility, low complexity, and no authentication or user interaction required. However, practical exploitation requires network access to the ROS middleware layer, which may be isolated in some deployments. If the ROS environment is exposed (intentionally or through misconfiguration) to an untrusted network, the attack is trivial to execute—a single crafted message can trigger the denial of service.
Remediation
Upgrade gazebo_plugins to a patched version released after 3.9.0. Verify the specific patch version against the vendor advisory to confirm the fix addresses input validation in gazebo_ros_diff_drive.cpp. Additionally, implement network segmentation to restrict ROS topic publishing to trusted hosts only, and consider deploying message validation middleware as a temporary compensating control.
Patch guidance
Check the official gazebo_plugins repository and release notes for versions newer than 3.9.0 that address this input validation issue. Apply the patch through your package manager (apt, pip, or source build) and rebuild any dependent ROS packages. Coordinate patching in development and simulation environments first, then production robotic systems, to minimize operational disruption. Verify the fix by confirming the gazebo_ros_diff_drive component remains responsive after receiving edge-case Twist messages.
Detection guidance
Monitor ROS topic logs for malformed or unexpected geometry_msgs::Twist messages. Set up alerts for crashes or restart events in the gazebo_ros_diff_drive component or the containing ROS node. In controlled environments, test with edge-case input values (extreme acceleration, NaN, infinity, null fields) to identify whether the component handles them gracefully. Network-level monitoring of ROS middleware traffic can reveal suspicious message patterns, though deep inspection requires ROS awareness.
Why prioritize this
This vulnerability earns HIGH priority due to its network-reachable attack surface, absence of authentication barriers, and potential to disrupt critical robotic systems. While the KEV catalog does not yet include this CVE, the combination of ease of exploitation and business impact on autonomous systems justifies immediate assessment and patching in affected environments. Organizations running ROS-based robots or simulations should treat this as a critical availability risk.
Risk score, explained
The CVSS 3.1 score of 7.5 (HIGH) reflects network vector (AV:N), low attack complexity (AC:L), no privileges required (PR:N), no user interaction (UI:N), and high availability impact (A:H). The score appropriately penalizes the lack of confidentiality and integrity impact but emphasizes the severity of service disruption in robotics contexts where availability is paramount. The score does not account for organizational risk factors (e.g., network isolation, criticality of affected systems), which should inform internal prioritization.
Frequently asked questions
Does this vulnerability affect ROS systems running older or newer versions of gazebo_plugins?
Only version 3.9.0 is confirmed affected based on current advisory data. Older versions may have different vulnerability profiles; newer versions may incorporate the fix. Consult vendor release notes to confirm patch status for your specific version.
Can this vulnerability lead to code execution or data exfiltration?
No. The vulnerability is limited to denial of service (availability impact). Attackers cannot execute arbitrary code or steal data through this flaw. However, service disruption in a robotic system could have cascading safety or operational consequences depending on deployment context.
What if our ROS deployment is air-gapped or behind a firewall?
If ROS topics are not exposed to untrusted networks, the attack surface is significantly reduced. However, insider threats or lateral movement from compromised hosts on the same network could still exploit the flaw. Patching remains the primary mitigation.
Are there temporary mitigations if we cannot patch immediately?
Implement strict access controls on ROS topic publishers, disable the differential drive controller if not in use, and monitor for unexpected node crashes. These are compensating controls, not substitutes for patching.
This analysis is based on published CVE data as of the document date. No exploit code or weaponized proof-of-concept is provided. Organizations should verify patch availability and compatibility with their specific ROS distribution and dependency stack before applying updates. This intelligence is provided for informational purposes; consult with your security and engineering teams to assess risk within your environment. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-08-10. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).
Weaknesses (CWE)
Related vulnerabilities
- CVE-2025-22424HIGHAndroid Local Privilege Escalation via Image Disclosure
- CVE-2025-48643HIGHAndroid Local Privilege Escalation via Provisioning Bypass
- CVE-2026-0078HIGHAndroid Privilege Escalation via DevicePolicyManagerService Desync
- CVE-2026-0419HIGHNETGEAR JR6150 Command Injection via Insufficient Input Validation
- CVE-2026-10020HIGHChrome Android Sandbox Escape via Skia Input Validation Flaw
- CVE-2026-10021HIGHGoogle Chrome USB Validation Flaw – RCE Vulnerability Patch
- CVE-2026-10037HIGHOpenJDK Sandbox Escape via MIME Handler Exploitation on Ubuntu
- CVE-2026-10651HIGHZephyr Bluetooth SDP Parser Buffer Over-Read Vulnerability