CVE-2026-38707: Critical Command Injection in InHand Networks IPSec VPN (IR302/305/315/615)
InHand Networks has a critical command injection flaw in the IPSec VPN component of multiple industrial router models (IR302, IR305, IR315, and IR615). An unauthenticated remote attacker can send specially crafted input to the VPN service to execute arbitrary system commands with root-level privileges, leading to complete device compromise. This affects firmware versions V3.5.108 (IR302) and V1.0.118 (IR305, IR315, IR615) and earlier releases.
Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain
- CVSS
- 3.1 · 9.8 CRITICAL · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
- Weaknesses (CWE)
- CWE-77
- Affected products
- 8 configuration(s)
- Published / Modified
- 2026-05-28 / 2026-06-17
NVD description (verbatim)
A command injection vulnerability exists in the IPSec VPN feature of InHand Networks IR302 firmware V3.5.108, IR305 firmware V1.0.118, IR315 firmware V1.0.118, IR615 firmware V1.0.118, and earlier versions. Attackers can exploit this vulnerability to obtain ROOT privileges on remote target devices.
1 reference(s) · View on NVD →
SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source
Technical summary
CVE-2026-38707 is a command injection vulnerability (CWE-77) residing in the IPSec VPN subsystem of InHand Networks industrial routers. The vulnerability allows unauthenticated, network-adjacent or remote exploitation without user interaction. The flaw stems from insufficient input validation on VPN configuration parameters, enabling an attacker to break out of the intended command context and inject arbitrary shell commands. Because the VPN service typically runs with elevated privileges in these appliances, successful exploitation grants immediate root access. The CVSS 3.1 vector (9.8 CRITICAL, AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H) reflects the worst-case scenario: network-reachable, low attack complexity, no authentication, and full confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact.
Business impact
Compromise of InHand routers carrying this flaw directly jeopardizes industrial and enterprise network perimeters. Attackers gaining root access can establish persistent backdoors, exfiltrate sensitive traffic passing through the device, modify routing and security policies, intercept or redirect VPN tunnels, or use the compromised router as a pivot point into protected networks. For organizations relying on these appliances for secure branch-office or OT network connectivity, exploitation translates to loss of network segmentation, potential operational downtime, and regulatory compliance violations (particularly in telecommunications, energy, and manufacturing sectors). Supply chain and managed service provider customers face cascading risk if multiple devices remain unpatched.
Affected systems
InHand Networks IR302, IR305, IR315, and IR615 industrial routers running firmware V3.5.108 (IR302) or V1.0.118 (IR305, IR315, IR615) and all earlier versions are vulnerable. Organizations should audit their infrastructure for any of these models and verify current firmware versions. The vulnerability affects the IPSec VPN feature specifically, though all instances of these firmware versions appear to be in scope regardless of whether VPN is actively deployed on a given unit.
Exploitability
This vulnerability presents an extremely high exploitation risk. No authentication is required—an attacker on the network (or with network routing to the device) can trigger the flaw with a single malformed VPN request. Attack complexity is minimal, requiring only knowledge of the vulnerable parameter format. Exploit development is straightforward given the nature of command injection; weaponization is likely already in progress or complete within the attacker community. The absence of CVE from the KEV catalog as of the published date does not reduce real-world threat. Industrial router management interfaces are frequently exposed to less trusted networks by design, increasing likelihood of attacker reconnaissance and access.
Remediation
Immediate patching is the primary remediation. InHand Networks should issue and document fixed firmware versions addressing CWE-77 input validation failures in the VPN subsystem. Organizations must apply patches to all affected IR302, IR305, IR315, and IR615 units as soon as vendor releases become available; verify patch availability and version numbers through official InHand Networks advisories. As an interim containment measure, restrict network access to the VPN management interface via firewall rules, network segmentation, and access control lists (ACLs), limiting connectivity to trusted administrative and branch-office IP ranges only. Disable IPSec VPN on affected devices if operationally feasible until patches are deployed.
Patch guidance
Wait for and obtain official firmware updates from InHand Networks addressing this vulnerability. Verify the fixed firmware version against the vendor's security advisory to confirm the CWE-77 input validation issue is resolved. Before applying patches to production systems, test the update in a controlled lab or staging environment to confirm compatibility and functionality with your VPN configurations. Document the patch application process and validate successful deployment on a sample of units before rolling out fleet-wide. Maintain backups of pre-patch configurations in case rollback is necessary. Schedule patching during maintenance windows to minimize impact on branch-office and OT network availability.
Detection guidance
Monitor VPN service logs and firewall/WAF rules for unusually formatted or escaped input to the IPSec VPN configuration endpoint. Look for payloads containing shell metacharacters (e.g., backticks, $(), |, &, ;, >) in VPN parameter fields where they should not appear. Implement network-based detection rules to flag suspicious VPN protocol exchanges to known-vulnerable firmware versions (if identifiable). Use endpoint detection and response (EDR) or SIEM to detect anomalous root-level process spawning from the VPN service daemon, particularly execution of unexpected binaries or shell interpreters. Query device logs for any evidence of successful command injection attempts, such as unexpected command output in audit trails or unusual file modifications post-compromise.
Why prioritize this
This vulnerability earns CRITICAL priority due to its network-reachable attack vector, zero authentication requirement, immediate root compromise outcome, and targeting of security-critical infrastructure (VPN appliances). Industrial router compromise directly threatens enterprise and OT network integrity. Even though KEV inclusion is not yet confirmed, the severity metrics and exploitability profile demand urgent action. Any organization operating affected InHand Networks models should treat this as a top-tier incident response priority, triggering immediate patch availability assessment and deployment planning.
Risk score, explained
The CVSS 3.1 score of 9.8 CRITICAL reflects the convergence of multiple aggravating factors: remote network attack surface (AV:N), minimal barriers to exploitation (AC:L), absence of authentication requirements (PR:N), no user interaction needed (UI:N), and unrestricted security impact spanning confidentiality, integrity, and availability (S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H). Command injection to root privilege escalation on a network-facing security appliance represents near worst-case vulnerability profile. The score appropriately captures the business and technical risk of widespread compromise affecting critical network infrastructure.
Frequently asked questions
We run these InHand models but don't actively use IPSec VPN. Are we still at risk?
Yes. While the vulnerability is specific to the IPSec VPN feature, all units running the vulnerable firmware versions are in scope. Even if VPN is not actively configured or in use, the vulnerable code path may remain present and exploitable. Until patching, treat all affected devices as vulnerable. Verify your firmware versions immediately.
Can we safely disable IPSec VPN as a temporary workaround?
Disabling IPSec VPN, if operationally feasible, can reduce immediate exposure while waiting for patches. However, this is a containment measure, not a permanent fix. Full remediation requires applying vendor patches. Consult your InHand router configuration documentation and network architecture to determine if VPN can be safely disabled in your environment.
How do we identify which InHand routers are running vulnerable firmware?
Access the device management interface (web UI or CLI) and check the system information or firmware version field. Cross-reference against the vulnerable versions listed: V3.5.108 or earlier for IR302; V1.0.118 or earlier for IR305, IR315, IR615. Document all matches and prioritize those units for patching. If bulk asset management tools are in use, query them for InHand device inventory.
What should we do if we suspect one of our routers has already been compromised?
Isolate the device from the network immediately to prevent lateral movement or exfiltration. Preserve logs and system state for forensic analysis. Assume any credentials, keys, or traffic passing through the device have been exposed. Contact InHand Networks support and your incident response team. Conduct thorough threat hunting across the network segment that device connected to, looking for signs of persistence, reconnaissance, or data exfiltration.
This analysis is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal, regulatory, or operational advice. Verify all patch versions, firmware availability, and technical details against official InHand Networks security advisories and vendor documentation before taking action. SEC.co makes no warranty regarding the completeness or accuracy of this analysis. Organizations are responsible for conducting their own risk assessments, testing patches in non-production environments, and determining appropriate remediation timelines based on their specific infrastructure, threat landscape, and business context. The absence of CVE from the KEV catalog does not diminish the severity or urgency of this vulnerability. Consult your security team, vendor support, and legal/compliance stakeholders before implementing containment or remediation measures. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-07-07. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).
Related vulnerabilities
- CVE-2024-52011HIGHCommand Injection in launch-editor via Malicious Filenames on Windows
- CVE-2026-10060MEDIUMTRENDnet TEW-432BRP Command Injection—End-of-Life Router Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-10061MEDIUMTRENDnet TEW-432BRP Command Injection Vulnerability – Remediation via Replacement
- CVE-2026-10127MEDIUMEdimax BR-6478AC Command Injection in Firmware 1.23
- CVE-2026-10166MEDIUMEdimax BR-6478AC Command Injection – Authentication Required
- CVE-2026-10180MEDIUMTRENDnet TEW-432BRP Command Injection Vulnerability – Hardware Retirement Required
- CVE-2026-10182MEDIUMTRENDnet TEW-432BRP Command Injection – Unpatched EOL Device
- CVE-2026-10214HIGHCommand Injection in chatgpt-on-wechat Bash Tool
Preview — this page is review (quality 0.975). high-value: hold for review.